Dinosaurs and the Flood

  • Thread starter Thread starter DanielJosephBoucher
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
could you now move to explaining the historical facts and simple logic that have escaped the professionals in these fields?
Here’s another fact that makes a mockery of Darwinist folklore - the first known water craft date to about 10,000 years ago.
So according to the Darwinist myth, it took 290,000 years for Homo sapiens to invent something as basic as dugout canoes and simple rafts!
 
Last edited:
Boats have actually existed for an extremely long time, for about 600k years. Homo Erectus remains have been discovered in locations that could not have been reached without them, so they must have had boats.
 
Last edited:
I changed my answer to meet new information. Can you respond to the new answer?
 
Okay, what’s your explanation for the presence of remains at those sites? How did people get and live there without water transport?
 
I don’t believe in God. The question makes no sense to me.
In that case, you have no choice but to believe Darwinist folklore and the fairy tale that H. sapiens have existed for 300,000 years.
 
40.png
Freddy:
I don’t believe in God. The question makes no sense to me.
In that case, you have no choice but to believe Darwinist folklore and the fairy tale that H. sapiens have existed for 300,000 years.
Whether I believe in God or not has no bearing on me following the science wherever it leads. Evolution doesn’t deny God. You seem to have a problem accepting that. I really don’t know why.
 
I just want you to explain this: How did they cross from Bali to Flores, a crossing impossible by swimming, without boats?
 
Whether I believe in God or not has no bearing on me following the science wherever it leads.
Atheism has no bearing on your acceptance of Darwinist folklore … I just love your sense of humour!
 
Disregarding your extremely dismissive remarks about evolution, his acceptance of it obviously doesn’t as I, a Catholic, also accept evolution.
 
I just want you to explain this: How did they cross from Bali to Flores, a crossing impossible by swimming, without boats
Pie in the sky. Prove to me that a boat was needed to go from Bali and Flores 600,000 years ago. For all you know, it could have all been one land mass, or separated by a mere hundred metres of water.
 
Pie in the sky. Prove to me that a boat was needed to go from Bali and Flores 600,000 years ago. For all you know, it could have all been one land mass, or separated by a mere hundred metres of water.
We know it wasn’t. Sea levels were much higher 600k years ago, as the planet itself was warmer (a conclusion derived from various sources, like crystal growth patterns, stalagmites, and tree rings). Sea levels reached their present position 35k years ago after falling continously for a large period of time, and continued that fall until 15k years ago, when it finally began to increase. Based on these pieces of evidence, archeologists have concluded that the islands were too separated for travel without boats.
I reject Darwinist folklore coz it fails as science.
Once again, dismissal of science without providing an alternative means you’ve done nothing to advance human knowledge.
 
Last edited:
40.png
Freddy:
Whether I believe in God or not has no bearing on me following the science wherever it leads.
Atheism has no bearing on your acceptance of Darwinist folklore … I just love your sense of humour!
I’ve really tried to have a sensible conversation. But there comes a time when one realises it’s not going to be possible. Life’s too short…

…way too short to spend time discussing dinosaurs and arks and the flood.
 
Last edited:
But humans have souls, which have to be made directly by God, because souls don’t evolve and don’t arise from evolution.
40,000 years ago, the Australian aborigines (human beings) roamed around Australia. Did they have or did they not have souls until 5-10000 years ago as another poster says the Bible requires?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top