Dispensations for canon 1012

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tannhauser_1509
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
T

Tannhauser_1509

Guest
Canon 1012 of the Church’s canon law states: “The minister of sacred ordination is a consecrated bishop.” Is it possible for this canon to be dispensed with in any circumstance whatsoever? I ask this because our episcopal see is currently vacant since the middle of last year. In this case, are there ever any legitimate pastoral reasons, therefore, for someone other than a bishop from another diocese to ordain someone a priest?
 
No.

Only a bishop has the fullest of orders and, therefore, only someone with episcopal character can invest someone else into another order of the Church. A priest or deacon would not have competent authority to do so because they are not in the fullness of this sacramental “apostolic succession.” This is why the priest receives his faculties from a bishop - he subordinately shares in and is dependent upon his bishop’s office.

Answer in CCC 1576 (Who Can Confer This Sacrament?)
Relevant are CCC 1536-89
 
Dispensation is granted by the local ordinary, for further knowledge, the Bishop’s local office is the Holy See, per se. Dispensations in this office, are approved indirectly truthfully according to Holy See.
 
our episcopal see is currently vacant since the middle of last year. In this case, are there ever any legitimate pastoral reasons, therefore, for someone other than a bishop from another diocese to ordain someone a priest?
So… you’re coming up on your first ordination season that will have to be postponed, or will this be the second?

I’ve seen situations in which seminarians’ ordinations have been postponed until the ordination/installation of their diocesan bishop was complete. I can’t imagine a “pastoral reason” that they might do otherwise. “Pastoral for whom?” would be my first question – for the ordinand?

In any case, it would seem odd for anyone in formation for diocesan priesthood to expect to receive a Call to Holy Orders from anyone else but his diocesan bishop. 🤷
 
Dispensation is granted by the local ordinary, for further knowledge, the Bishop’s local office is the Holy See, per se. Dispensations in this office, are approved indirectly truthfully according to Holy See.
Hello,

Until now, I’ve never heard anyone say or even suggest that a “local ordinary” would be able to grant a dispensation from the requirement of a bishop carrying out a presbyteral ordination. I wholeheartedly disagree with the idea.

Dan
 
Canon 1012 of the Church’s canon law states: “The minister of sacred ordination is a consecrated bishop.” Is it possible for this canon to be dispensed with in any circumstance whatsoever? I ask this because our episcopal see is currently vacant since the middle of last year. In this case, are there ever any legitimate pastoral reasons, therefore, for someone other than a bishop from another diocese to ordain someone a priest?
No. The way to resolve the issue is: If there is a vacant see, the dimissorial letter would be issued by the administrator of the diocese. If the administrator of the diocese is, in fact, not a bishop, then a bishop would be invited to come to do the ordination – just as needs to happen if the diocese is vacant at the time of the Chrism Mass. It could be a retired bishop, an auxiliary bishop, a nuncio or member of the Roman curia, as well as the diocesan bishop of another diocese.

The alternative is that the one to be ordained himself goes, with the dimissorial letter, to where the bishop is who has accepted to confer the ordination.
*Can. 1018 §1. The following can give dimissorial letters for secular clergy:

1/ the proper bishop mentioned in ⇒ can. 1016;

2/ an apostolic administrator and, with the consent of the college of consultors, a diocesan administrator; with the consent of the council mentioned in ⇒ can. 495, §2, an apostolic pro-vicar and an apostolic pro-prefect.

§2. A diocesan administrator, apostolic pro-vicar, and apostolic pro-prefect are not to grant dimissorial letters to those who have been denied admission to orders by the diocesan bishop, the apostolic vicar, or the apostolic prefect.*
This is the habitual experience of religious clergy, by the way. The major superior of the entity where the cleric-to-be will be incardinated is normally never a bishop – be he an abbot or a prior provincial, etc. That person would himself grant the dimissorial and then arrange for a prelate with the episcopal character to confer the ordination.

There is no dispensation from Canon 1012. There are canons for which there is no dispensation. One cannot, for example, grant or obtain a dispensation regarding Canon 1024 either.
 
So what is your worry, exactly?
No worry at all. It’s just, in June two men will be ordained to the priesthood and transitional diaconate, and so I’m curious how the dynamic would play out. Don Ruggero’s response has explained to me how that may work, given our see is currently vacant.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top