I would say it is *an attempt *to approach St Jerome’s text, rather than asserting that it is done so. But we stray from topic.
I agree, you are correct that it is an attempt to approach St. Jerome’s translation. But again, the source of its attempt can hardly be ignored, i.e. the Codex Amiatinus. Unless of course you assert a different opinion, other than that this is the best medieval witness to St. Jerome’s original text. In any event, an attempt to approach the Original of St. Jerome is better than no attempt at all.
Okay…well, it was a bit of hyperbole.
Most of the time, I don’t know who the websites are run by…not everyone makes it obvious. I would be less bothered by a sedevacantist-run site than an athiest, pro-choice-run site. I would be more bothered by a “Catholic” run site by those pushing for female priests than one by sedevacantists.Good logic…
How so?rlg94086;2108755:
Good logic…Okay…well, it was a bit of hyperbole.
I’ll see your :twocents: , and raise you a nickel.How so?
It seems to me that either one – A “Catholic” site run by sedevacantists or one run by woman-ordainers – should be held in the same esteem as a “Catholic” site run by any other protestants.
:twocents:
tee
Come to think of it, I am more bothered by the woman-ordainers than by Protestants…I’ll see your :twocents: , and raise you a nickel.
IMHO, I don’t consider the sedevacantists the same as woman-ordainers. I believe that the former are wrong about the pope and will hopefully be reconciled as the TLM is made more available. I believe the latter do more damage to the Church.
Pax,
Robert
Can someone please tell me what it means? I can’t figure it from reading here.
I have to plead complete ignorance here. I have seen the following word in a number of the posts for this topic:
Sedevacantists believe that the past few popes ( well all of the ones since the 1950s) are not real popes. They consider the office to be vacant.
It would be,
This is considered schismatic [by some; others just think sedevacantists wrong, but wouldn’t go that far, as to declare them in schism] because they are no longer following Rome.
What can I tell you??I’m
Methodist!!
Sedevacantism is Latin for the seat is vacant. This refers to the Chair of Peter. Sedevacantists don’t recognize Pope Benedict XVI as the legitimate pope. Most sedevacantists don’t recognize Bl. John XXIII, Paul VI, John Paul I, John Paul II, and Benedict XVI as legitimate popes. These are the popes since the Second Vatican Council was convened.I have to plead complete ignorance here. I have seen the following word in a number of the posts for this topic:
sedevacantists
Can someone please tell me what it means? I can’t figure it from reading here.
[post=2103936]See above[/post] for two.
I don’t know what other languages’ benchmarks might be, but the Unbound Bible, linked above, allows up to 4 parallel views. The site is part of Biola University, which though not Catholic, likewise seems not antithetical to Catholicism.
I think they are scared that when the SSPX is regularized into full communion, the people will wake up and realize what a line of stuff they have been fed over the years. It will not take much, only time, to bring the Bishops from the SSPX along with the rest of them back. It’s really ashamed it has gone this long. Like the proverbial 40 years in the desert.(I mean about the crisis we are seeing the fruits of today)
