F
Flopfoot
Guest
These are listed in Exodus 20:1-17
Most of us agree on the middle seven -
Both of those combinations make sense and it seems like we could do with just nine commandments but then it wouldn’t be a nice round number.
The annoying thing about having different numberings is you can’t say to someone “it’s cause of the 5th commandment” and know whether they are thinking of the same commandment as you.
Is there any theological reason for divvying them up one way or the other? (Ignoring the Protestant conspiracy theory that Catholics are deliberately trying to hide the commandment against idols?)
Exodus 20:17 begins by saying not to covet your neighbour’s house - it doesn’t mention their wife until the middle of the verse. So that does seem like a point against the Catholic numbering.
The CCC does have a section on coveting your neighbour’s wife (paragraphs 2514 to 2533) but if we were to adopt the Protestant numbering then those verses could just be put into the section on adultery instead, since that section starts by quoting Matt 5:28 anyway.
Most of us agree on the middle seven -
- Don’t use God’s name in vain
- Keep holy the Sabbath
- Honor your father and mother
- Don’t kill
- Don’t commit adultery
- Don’t steal
- Don’t bear false witness
Both of those combinations make sense and it seems like we could do with just nine commandments but then it wouldn’t be a nice round number.
The annoying thing about having different numberings is you can’t say to someone “it’s cause of the 5th commandment” and know whether they are thinking of the same commandment as you.
Is there any theological reason for divvying them up one way or the other? (Ignoring the Protestant conspiracy theory that Catholics are deliberately trying to hide the commandment against idols?)
Exodus 20:17 begins by saying not to covet your neighbour’s house - it doesn’t mention their wife until the middle of the verse. So that does seem like a point against the Catholic numbering.
The CCC does have a section on coveting your neighbour’s wife (paragraphs 2514 to 2533) but if we were to adopt the Protestant numbering then those verses could just be put into the section on adultery instead, since that section starts by quoting Matt 5:28 anyway.