Do all protestants interprete the Bible literally?

  • Thread starter Thread starter shondrea
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
S

shondrea

Guest
With as many branches of protestantism as there are, I was wondering. Every denomination translates it differently, I know, and emphasizes different things and whatnot, but is what I was taught true, that all denominations interprite it in a literal sense?

No debate here, just curious 🙂
 
No. Older branches of Protestantism tend towards a single, plain reading that tends towards literal reading, however, not everything in the Bible can be taken completely literally and most of the reformers were aware of this.
 
Fundamentalists and conservative Evangelicals tend to interpret the Bible as literally as possible (except that part that says “This is My Body” …)

Other Protestants, such as the Mainline denominations, are more likely to view Scripture as symbolic or allegorical.
 
No, no human being can interpret the Bible literally. To say that “everything in the Bible is literal” would mean that parables and other various devices are non existant. It would mean that Protestants literally think Jesus is a lamb with 7 eyes or whatever the things described in revelation is, and make no sense.

When people say they take a “literal” interpretation of the Bible its usually like kind of a way to make themselves better and more “bible based”.
 
I read the Bible 'literally". I seek to understand what the authors were seeking to convey through their words. I may not believe the conclusions they drew…nor do I necessarily believe the fantastic stories and myths they espoused…I seek to understand how they understood God through the passages they penned and then compare those beliefs to the revelation of God in Jesus of Nazareth…God spoke His final Word in the life of Jesus of Nazareth…if I wish to know what God is like…I look to Jesus and seek to understand what it was about him that caused men to “leave their nets” and follow him.

I seek to understand the cultural and historical settings in which those writings took place and weigh them against reason and experience…and if my reason is impaired…I rely on grace and mercy…I am loved with an everlasting love…I was sought by the Shepherd as He left the 99 and went into the wilderness to find the “lost one”…I trust in the Father who watched and waited every day for His son to BEGIN his Journey Home…and the Father RAN TO HIM AND EMBRACED him.

I read the Bible literallly…but I do not believe it is “literally 100% factual” in everything it says…but in it’s words are contained the word of God as experienced by it’s authors…it’s now my turn to “write my own chapter” of how God deals with me…and so far…it has BEEN A JOURNEY.
 
Well, I haven’t seen even the most fundamental bible literalist cutting off their hands or plucking out their eyes (the single exception being poor old Origen who in the 3rd century or so castrated himself) so obviously they don’t take it ALL completely literally.
 
I read the Bible 'literally". I seek to understand what the authors were seeking to convey through their words. I may not believe the conclusions they drew…nor do I necessarily believe the fantastic stories and myths they espoused…I seek to understand how they understood God through the passages they penned and then compare those beliefs to the revelation of God in Jesus of Nazareth…God spoke His final Word in the life of Jesus of Nazareth…if I wish to know what God is like…I look to Jesus and seek to understand what it was about him that caused men to “leave their nets” and follow him.

I seek to understand the cultural and historical settings in which those writings took place and weigh them against reason and experience…and if my reason is impaired…I rely on grace and mercy…I am loved with an everlasting love…I was sought by the Shepherd as He left the 99 and went into the wilderness to find the “lost one”…I trust in the Father who watched and waited every day for His son to BEGIN his Journey Home…and the Father RAN TO HIM AND EMBRACED him.

I read the Bible literallly…but I do not believe it is “literally 100% factual” in everything it says…but in it’s words are contained the word of God as experienced by it’s authors…it’s now my turn to “write my own chapter” of how God deals with me…and so far…it has BEEN A JOURNEY.
What standards (reason and experience??)do u use to determine the validity or lack thereof of their conclusions? The “fantastic myths and stories” you mention. How do u compare those beliefs to the revelation of God in Jesus written by those same authors?
 
No. Personally, I take it as literally as makes sense, given the linguistic, cultural and historical context – but I think if you don’t take those things into account, you’ll get it wrong, and get a message other than the one God intended.
 
No. Personally, I take it as literally as makes sense, given the linguistic, cultural and historical context – but I think if you don’t take those things into account, you’ll get it wrong, and get a message other than the one God intended.
What do you mean “other than God intended?” Can you give an example of something that matches that idea? Thanks.
 
With as many branches of protestantism as there are, I was wondering. Every denomination translates it differently, I know, and emphasizes different things and whatnot, but is what I was taught true, that all denominations interprite it in a literal sense?

No debate here, just curious 🙂
That depends on what you mean by “literal.” If you mean every single word is taken as it is literally said, even if in isolation, then I most certainly hope no one does that because, as said by others, there are parts such as the parables where it is obviously a metaphor for something else.

If by “literal” you mean the word of God is taken to mean what it means within its proper context, then yes - that is the goal of sola scriptura.
 
That depends on what you mean by “literal.” If you mean every single word is taken as it is literally said, even if in isolation, then I most certainly hope no one does that because, as said by others, there are parts such as the parables where it is obviously a metaphor for something else.

If by “literal” you mean the word of God is taken to mean what it means within its proper context, then yes - that is the goal of sola scriptura.
When I hear “interprete the Bible literally” I usually think the person means in regard to things like 7-Day creation, the Flood, Joshua’s long day, Jonah and the ‘big fish’ (we say its a whale;)) right up to Jesus’ healing miracles and the Resurrection.
If that is the standard they are using then I stand with those who take the Bible ‘literally’.
 
I have used this for the teen Bible study i lead:

backtothebible.org/images/pdf/understanding.pdf

from lesson 2: on page 6

PRINCIPLE 1: Accept the Bible as Literal

Generally the Bible should be interpreted exactly as it is written (literally).

But Scripture, like any other piece of good literature, also uses figures of speech such as:

*Hyperbole: a deliberate exaggeration

Simile: a comparison between two unlike things usually introduced
by “like” or “as”

Metaphor: the use of one kind of word or phrase to describe an
entirely different object or idea (i.e.: “drowning in money” or “the
bloom of life”)*
 
When I hear “interprete the Bible literally” I usually think the person means in regard to things like 7-Day creation, the Flood, Joshua’s long day, Jonah and the ‘big fish’ (we say its a whale;)) right up to Jesus’ healing miracles and the Resurrection.
If that is the standard they are using then I stand with those who take the Bible ‘literally’.
As for stuff in the Old Testament, I take them literally because Christ does. 😛 He talks about the creation, the flood, the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah, and Jonah in the belly of the fish as all literal historical events. Who am I, o man, to argue with Him? 😃

As for stuff in the New Testament, of course I take that literally (with the exception of some prophetic parts in Matthew and the last two-thirds of John’s Revelation).
 
What standards (reason and experience??)do u use to determine the validity or lack thereof of their conclusions? The “fantastic myths and stories” you mention. How do u compare those beliefs to the revelation of God in Jesus written by those same authors?
While I do not take an “all or nothing” approach to scripture…as you seem to indicate I should by the way your question was asked…I find great spiritual truth in scripture.

To illustrate my point concerning “reason”…I once watched “Jason and the Argonauts” and the “Ten Commandments”, one right after the other on a Saturday afternoon and I was struck by the amazing similarities of the “mystical/magical” events each portrayed. Jason spoke directly with Hera…Moses spoke directly with YHVH. Jason’s crew was saved from being smashed by clolliding mountains as he sailed through a narrow channel by Posiden…The Israelites were saved by the parting of the Red Sea. The sowing of the Hydra’s teeth produced ‘death’ personified by long dead soldiers bones rising to kill all in their path…the “angel of death” killed each first born…whether innocent or not…if one did not have the “magic” blood on the door posts and lintels…the first born died…even the children.

I mark this as the beginning point of my “liberalness”. From that point on, I read every book on biblical criticism I could find…I found that much of things I was taught as to when and who wrote the Pentatuch to be false…Moses did not write the “Five Books of Moses”…they didn’t take their present form until after the Return from Exile in the 6th century BCE.

Much of Israel’s history is “pious myth” with a lot of verifiable history thrown in. I then read about “2nd and 3rd Isaiah” and the “prophetic” passages being written concerning Cyrus years after the fact…there was no “soothsaying” going on…no “events foretold” long before they occured to “proove” the divinity of scripture. I read the so called “messianic” prophesies in a whole new light…“prophesies” which the fledgling Christian movement appropriated for themselves to “proove” that Jesus of Nazareth was the long expected “messiah”. As I got into the New Testament I found that some of the writers that claimed to quote from the prophets…‘misquoted’ and were in error as to who’s writings they were quoting…it would seem that…in my mind anyway…if the NT scritpures were divinely inspiried by the Holy Spirit…He didn’t know His own bood too well…he gave the wrong author to the “prophesy” quoted by the gospel writer.

Only when I began to understand how the scriptues were written was I able to finally see the value and worth of them. They are not history books…they are religious writings, put down to seek to convey how God was experienced by these people.

In the NT the life of Jesus as portrayed in the gospels were not “biographies”…but “gospels”…Good News that God has removed all ritual impediment in Jesus of Nazareth and “true religion” was not based on rituals and rites…but in serving one another.

Friends approach God “experimentally”…God is not a character long silent and confined to only ancient times…but a Living Present Reality in our lives NOW. Each of us could put to pen a new ‘scripture’ of how God deals with us in the present…and write concerning how He has manifested in our lives…and the “miracles” we have experienced…and some decades or centuries after we are long dead…some one may pick up our “book” and say…"This is the word of God inspired by the Holy Spirit.’…as some of us could relay what we perceived was God’s “voice”…how many times have we heard someone say "God said to me…“Go and begin” a particualar ministry. Or “Go and take so and so some food and clothing”…did God really…factually…audibly say…“XYZ”? Did He vibrate the air around us to sound was piced up through our auditory system? Or was is a ‘sense’ of what we shoud do?

Oh, I know there are those who claim that God told them to join a certain religious group…or start a new one…but FOR ME…unless that “voice” they heard inspired them to minister to very human needs…it is of no consequence.

How each of us experiences God is a diverse as we are as individuals.

The writers of the NT “experienced” “Something” deep and profound in the life and teachings of Jesus of Nazareth. He spoke words that had never been spoken in the way they were spoken…he loved as no one had ever loved…he gave everything…he poured out his life…he “loved extravegantly” and completely…and in this “Solitary Life” those who met him and heard his words experienced God in their midst…and they wrote about that experience…they didnt’ write a “biography”…but “good news” that God had moved among us in a unique and profound way…

Those called “heretics” by those that eventually formed the religious institution which became the “Orthodox/Catholic” church also sought to express what they had experience and came to believe about this man…and the leaders of the “proto-orthodox/catholic” group gained prominence and insisted that their view was the “correct” view of how this man was to be understood…

I have given a very “simplistic” synopsis of the many books and classes I have read and taken over the decades…but essentially that is the conclusion they…and I…have drawn concerning the matter.

(cont"
 
cont…

Bottom line…any religious belief that does not serve our collective and individual humanity by addressing its needs of love, justice, mercy, compassion and take into account and seek to answer the basic needs of food and clothing is of no use…the author of James" asks what good is it to tell someone that you’ll “pray for them” yet leave them cold and hungry?

I am a Friend first and foremost because in the Society of Friends we don’t “forget” who we are and what our “concerns” shoud truly be…to make this a better world for everyone…to seek to answer the basic needs of love, clothes, food, shelter to “the least of these”…and only by seeking “that of God” in the individual can God be truly met…for most of us who call ourselves “Quaker”…God is not found in rituals and rites and creeds and books…but in the person sitting next to us on the bus…or the meeting house…or at the instersection holding a sign…“I’m hungry, please help.”
 
While I do not take an “all or nothing” approach to scripture…as you seem to indicate I should by the way your question was asked…I find great spiritual truth in scripture.

To illustrate my point concerning “reason”…I once watched “Jason and the Argonauts” and the “Ten Commandments”, one right after the other on a Saturday afternoon and I was struck by the amazing similarities of the “mystical/magical” events each portrayed. Jason spoke directly with Hera…Moses spoke directly with YHVH. Jason’s crew was saved from being smashed by clolliding mountains as he sailed through a narrow channel by Posiden…The Israelites were saved by the parting of the Red Sea. The sowing of the Hydra’s teeth produced ‘death’ personified by long dead soldiers bones rising to kill all in their path…the “angel of death” killed each first born…whether innocent or not…if one did not have the “magic” blood on the door posts and lintels…the first born died…even the children.

I mark this as the beginning point of my “liberalness”. From that point on, I read every book on biblical criticism I could find…I found that much of things I was taught as to when and who wrote the Pentatuch to be false…Moses did not write the “Five Books of Moses”…they didn’t take their present form until after the Return from Exile in the 6th century BCE.

Much of Israel’s history is “pious myth” with a lot of verifiable history thrown in. I then read about “2nd and 3rd Isaiah” and the “prophetic” passages being written concerning Cyrus years after the fact…there was no “soothsaying” going on…no “events foretold” long before they occured to “proove” the divinity of scripture. I read the so called “messianic” prophesies in a whole new light…“prophesies” which the fledgling Christian movement appropriated for themselves to “proove” that Jesus of Nazareth was the long expected “messiah”. As I got into the New Testament I found that some of the writers that claimed to quote from the prophets…‘misquoted’ and were in error as to who’s writings they were quoting…it would seem that…in my mind anyway…if the NT scritpures were divinely inspiried by the Holy Spirit…He didn’t know His own bood too well…he gave the wrong author to the “prophesy” quoted by the gospel writer.

Only when I began to understand how the scriptues were written was I able to finally see the value and worth of them. They are not history books…they are religious writings, put down to seek to convey how God was experienced by these people.

In the NT the life of Jesus as portrayed in the gospels were not “biographies”…but “gospels”…Good News that God has removed all ritual impediment in Jesus of Nazareth and “true religion” was not based on rituals and rites…but in serving one another.

Friends approach God “experimentally”…God is not a character long silent and confined to only ancient times…but a Living Present Reality in our lives NOW. Each of us could put to pen a new ‘scripture’ of how God deals with us in the present…and write concerning how He has manifested in our lives…and the “miracles” we have experienced…and some decades or centuries after we are long dead…some one may pick up our “book” and say…"This is the word of God inspired by the Holy Spirit.’…as some of us could relay what we perceived was God’s “voice”…how many times have we heard someone say "God said to me…“Go and begin” a particualar ministry. Or “Go and take so and so some food and clothing”…did God really…factually…audibly say…“XYZ”? Did He vibrate the air around us to sound was piced up through our auditory system? Or was is a ‘sense’ of what we shoud do?

Oh, I know there are those who claim that God told them to join a certain religious group…or start a new one…but FOR ME…unless that “voice” they heard inspired them to minister to very human needs…it is of no consequence.

How each of us experiences God is a diverse as we are as individuals.

The writers of the NT “experienced” “Something” deep and profound in the life and teachings of Jesus of Nazareth. He spoke words that had never been spoken in the way they were spoken…he loved as no one had ever loved…he gave everything…he poured out his life…he “loved extravegantly” and completely…and in this “Solitary Life” those who met him and heard his words experienced God in their midst…and they wrote about that experience…they didnt’ write a “biography”…but “good news” that God had moved among us in a unique and profound way…

Those called “heretics” by those that eventually formed the religious institution which became the “Orthodox/Catholic” church also sought to express what they had experience and came to believe about this man…and the leaders of the “proto-orthodox/catholic” group gained prominence and insisted that their view was the “correct” view of how this man was to be understood…

I have given a very “simplistic” synopsis of the many books and classes I have read and taken over the decades…but essentially that is the conclusion they…and I…have drawn concerning the matter.

(cont"
I was not implying intentionally an “all or none” approach. Being labeled “liberal” is relative to how far someone is on the right.🙂
 
Fundamentalists and conservative Evangelicals tend to interpret the Bible as literally as possible (except that part that says “This is My Body” …)

Other Protestants, such as the Mainline denominations, are more likely to view Scripture as symbolic or allegorical.
I thought it was “this is my body…do this in remembrance of me.” For the bread of God is he which cometh down from heaven, and giveth life unto the world. Then said they unto him, Lord, evermore give us this bread. And Jesus said unto them, I am the bread of life: he that cometh to me shall never hunger; and he that believeth on me shall never thirst." John 6:33-35.

“And this is the will of him that sent me, that every one which seeth the Son, and believeth on him, may have everlasting life…” John 6:40

“It is the spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life.” John 6:63
Jesus was talking spiritually, not physically. He was explaining that spiritually, all life comes through faith in Him, not eating His body.

“For I have received of the Lord that which also I delivered unto you, That the Lord Jesus the same night in which he was betrayed took bread: And when he had given thanks, he brake it, and said, Take, eat: this is my body, which is broken for you: this do in remembrance of me.” 1 Corinthians 11:23-24
 
With as many branches of protestantism as there are, I was wondering. Every denomination translates it differently, I know, and emphasizes different things and whatnot, but is what I was taught true, that all denominations interprite it in a literal sense?

No debate here, just curious 🙂
Some do, which is why you have to be careful when they bring out the fish hooks. 😃
 
With as many branches of protestantism as there are, I was wondering. Every denomination translates it differently, I know, and emphasizes different things and whatnot, but is what I was taught true, that all denominations interprite it in a literal sense?

No debate here, just curious 🙂
Dispensational premillenialists are extremely literal in their interpretation of scripture:

"So what is the key to Dispensationalism?
The literal method of interpretation is the key. Using the literal method of interpreting the biblical covenants and prophecy leads to a specific set of core beliefs about God’s kingdom program, and what the future will hold for ethnic Israel and for the Church. We therefore recognize a distinction between Israel and the Church, and a promised future earthly reign of Christ on the throne of David. (The Davidic Kingdom.) This leads a person to some very specific conclusions about the Endtimes:

-Israel must be re-gathered to their land as promised by God.
-Daniel’s seventieth week prophecy specifically refers to the purging of the nation Israel, and not the Church. These were the clear words spoken to Daniel. The church doesn’t need purging from sin. It is already clean.
-Some of the warnings in Matthew 24 are directed at the Jews, and not the Church (since God will be finishing His plan with national Israel)
-A Pretribulation rapture - Israel is seen in Daniel as the key player during the tribulation, not the Church. God removes the elect when he brings judgment on the world. i.e. Noah, John 14, 1 Thess 4:16.
-Premillennialism - A literal 1000 year Millennial Kingdom, where Christ returns before the Millennium starts. Revelation 20 doesn’t give us a reason to interpret the 1000 years as symbolic. Also, Dispensationalists see the promised literal reign of Christ in the OT. Note the chronological order of events between Revelation 19-21."
endtimes.org/dispens.html

the ‘Dispys’ only started around the 1850’s with Darby and Scofield. Tim Lahaye (‘Left Behind’ series) and John Hagee are examples of people who buy into this errant theology.

see also
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dispensationalism
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top