Do Anglican bishops have Apostolic Succession?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Brendan_64
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Anglicans who cite Ott, Lutherans who insist that they’ve never believed in consubstantiation, what’s next; Baptists praying the rosary?

CAF has become quite the motley assortment of believers, eh? Good stuff!
 
Anglicans who cite Ott, Lutherans who insist that they’ve never believed in consubstantiation, what’s next; Baptists praying the rosary?

CAF has become quite the motley assortment of believers, eh? Good stuff!
I’m reasonably motley, yes. Can cite all sorts of stuff. I blame all the books.

GKC
 
Anglicans who cite Ott, Lutherans who insist that they’ve never believed in consubstantiation, what’s next; Baptists praying the rosary?

CAF has become quite the motley assortment of believers, eh? Good stuff!
Well… we do have Catholic singing Lutheran Hymns in church and their goodly priest wear Presbyterian clerical collars.

God save us…the ‘motley’ is catching 🙂
 
Well… we do have Catholic singing Lutheran Hymns in church and their goodly priest wear Presbyterian clerical collars.

God save us…the ‘motley’ is catching 🙂
(Heh-heh-heh). Today CAF. Tomorrow, the internet.

GKC
 
As posted before, Anglicans have Apostolic Succession by their full communion with Lutherans and association with other Catholic groups such as Old Catholics. The Vatican has never questioned the AP of Lutherans.
 
As posted before, Anglicans have Apostolic Succession by their full communion with Lutherans and association with other Catholic groups such as Old Catholics. The Vatican has never questioned the AP of Lutherans.
AP? You mean “AS” abbreviated for apostolic succession? Of course they have. Catholicism does not regard Lutheran ministers to be the recipients of the Sacrament of Holy Orders. That may be too blunt a way of putting it (my apologies if so), but clarity is called for here.

Maybe you meant “Old Catholics” in that last line. An interesting argument can be made in that direction and Rome has studiously ignored it for an embarrassingly long time now. But nobody ever argued that Jesus promised the church would teach infallibly and in a timely manner! 😉
 
As posted before, Anglicans have Apostolic Succession by their full communion with Lutherans and association with other Catholic groups such as Old Catholics. The Vatican has never questioned the AP of Lutherans.
And that’s assuming that Apostolicae Curae is good history and theology. There are those of us that think it is not, and who believe that the Church of England, for all its faults, has always preserved the historic succession of bishops right back to the Apostolic church via Archbishop Parker.
 
AP? You mean “AS” abbreviated for apostolic succession? Of course they have. Catholicism does not regard Lutheran ministers to be the recipients of the Sacrament of Holy Orders. That may be too blunt a way of putting it (my apologies if so), but clarity is called for here.

Maybe you meant “Old Catholics” in that last line. An interesting argument can be made in that direction and Rome has studiously ignored it for an embarrassingly long time now. But nobody ever argued that Jesus promised the church would teach infallibly and in a timely manner! 😉
Oops, I meant AS. I think AP is a news service. But can you cite where Roman Catholics deny the Apostolic Succession of Lutherans?
 
As posted before, Anglicans have Apostolic Succession by their full communion with Lutherans and association with other Catholic groups such as Old Catholics. The Vatican has never questioned the AP of Lutherans.
Okay. I am confused. Anglicans have Apostolic Succession by their full communion with Lutherans? This is something of which I was not aware. My understanding is that it is the Anglican Church that it in communion with the Old Catholics, not the Lutherans. Hey, you learn something everyday. 🤷
 
Okay. I am confused. Anglicans have Apostolic Succession by their full communion with Lutherans? This is something of which I was not aware. My understanding is that it is the Anglican Church that it in communion with the Old Catholics, not the Lutherans. Hey, you learn something everyday. 🤷
Not all Anglicans, but ECUSA is in communion with ELCA. Other Lutherans and Anglicans (whom I understand to be very conservative) are not.

The term Anglican confuses me honestly. It used to mean members of the CofE and the Anglican communion. Nowadays I’m not so sure.

I left TECUSA before all the splitting and confusion. Things got really odd when we got our first female rector and I was gone.
 
Oops, I meant AS. I think AP is a news service. But can you cite where Roman Catholics deny the Apostolic Succession of Lutherans?
I’m lousy with citations, so I’ll have to appeal to others for a specific classification where Lutheranism was determined to be an “ecclesial community” rather than a “church” (properly defined). But here’s a catechism quote that lays out the principles more charitably than I can:

819 “Furthermore, many elements of sanctification and of truth”273 are found outside the visible confines of the Catholic Church: “the written Word of God; the life of grace; faith, hope, and charity, with the other interior gifts of the Holy Spirit, as well as visible elements.”274 Christ’s Spirit uses these Churches and ecclesial communities as means of salvation, whose power derives from the fullness of grace and truth that Christ has entrusted to the Catholic Church. All these blessings come from Christ and lead to him,275 and are in themselves calls to “Catholic unity.”276

In this terminology, “churches” are referring to the Eastern Orthodox, Eastern Catholic Churches and recent schismatic groups like the ‘Old Catholics.’ These groups have both maintained a theology of the Sacrament of Holy Orders (and the other sacraments, actually) and actually continued the tradition of ordaining bishops in unbroken line from the apostles. As I mentioned above, I can’t give you a citation, but I’m morally certain that Lutheranism is considered an “ecclesial community” rather than a “church” due to theological issues over my head. It’s not meant to be an affront, but to differentiate. Anybody who can point to a tidier citation is appreciated!
 
Okay. I am confused. Anglicans have Apostolic Succession by their full communion with Lutherans? This is something of which I was not aware. My understanding is that it is the Anglican Church that it in communion with the Old Catholics, not the Lutherans. Hey, you learn something everyday. 🤷
It is complicated. For example, Lutherans in north America did not have episcopacy until bishops from the Episcopal Church [Anglican Church in Canada] and Lutheran bishops from Europe re-established the episcopal ministries of bishop/ priest/ deacon. Anglicans in Europe joined the Provoo Communion with Lutheran Sees from Scandinavian countries. For example, the line of Apostolic Succession is uninterrupted in Sweden/ Finland, etc. and now that line extends to the Church of England.

I am not as acquainted with Old Catholics.
 
Not all Anglicans, but ECUSA is in communion with ELCA. Other Lutherans and Anglicans (whom I understand to be very conservative) are not.

The term Anglican confuses me honestly. It used to mean members of the CofE and the Anglican communion. Nowadays I’m not so sure.

I left TECUSA before all the splitting and confusion. Things got really odd when we got our first female rector and I was gone.
Thanks. I have a better picture of what is going on now. So the liberal branches of both the Lutherans and the Anglicans have joined forces and then claim succession through the Old Catholic Church. Do I have that right? My question is whether or not the Lutherans are in full communion with the Old Catholics?
 
Thanks. I have a better picture of what is going on now. So the liberal branches of both the Lutherans and the Anglicans have joined forces and then claim succession through the Old Catholic Church. Do I have that right? My question is whether or not the Lutherans are in full communion with the Old Catholics?
Anglicans have been, since the Agreement of Bonn, in 1932. Old Catholics of Utrecht, that is. And with the PNCC from 1946, to a point in time, I forget, late 70s.

I do not assert any particular conclusions from this, those some possibilities come to mind.

GKC
 
Anglicans have been, since the Agreement of Bonn, in 1932. Old Catholics of Utrecht, that is. And with the PNCC from 1946, to a point in time, I forget, late 70s.

I do not assert any particular conclusions from this, those some possibilities come to mind.

GKC
But is this where Anglicans claim succession? From the Old Catholics? Did they not claim it prior to 1932? I’m trying to piece together the relationship between Lutherans, Anglicans and Old Catholics as far as the claim to apostolic succession and my knowledge of these events is abysmal.
 
Thanks. I have a better picture of what is going on now. So the liberal branches of both the Lutherans and the Anglicans have joined forces and then claim succession through the Old Catholic Church. Do I have that right? My question is whether or not the Lutherans are in full communion with the Old Catholics?
It is not a matter of “liberal branches” unless one is only referring to the ELCA and Episcopalians in the U.S and perhaps the Lutheran Church of Canada and the Anglican Church of Canada where they even held joint assemblies this summer. These full communions were necessary because of the Anglican insistence that episcopacy be the standard in north America. But neither Lutherans nor Episcopalians had Apostolic Succession until the ‘mother churches’ in Europe participated in the laying on of hands at ordinations/ consecrations.

In Europe, on the other hand, Lutherans, specifically Scandinavian and Baltic national churches, have always had apostolic succession. The formation of this Lutheran Communion in Provoo Finland eventually included the various Anglican national churches [Church of England, Church of Ireland, etc.] Provoo was the start of these efforts to unite all catholic churches [Lutheran and Anglican] under episcopacy and apostolic succession toward the greater goal of reunification with the Church of Rome.
 
My understanding is that whatever apostolic succession the Anglicans may have gained from their alliance with the Old Catholics they promptly forfeited when they began “ordaining” women, because such an act represents so stark a departure from the legitimately Catholic understanding of the sacrament of Holy Orders that they can no longer be regarded as having the intention to do what the Church does when ordaining.
 
But is this where Anglicans claim succession? From the Old Catholics? Did they not claim it prior to 1932? I’m trying to piece together the relationship between Lutherans, Anglicans and Old Catholics as far as the claim to apostolic succession and my knowledge of these events is abysmal.
Some Anglicans (you remember motley), point to the logic in the joint episcopal consecrations since 1932, as an end run around Apostolicae Curae, per the logic in Ott, p. 458. Others discount Apostolicae Curae, ab initio. AC means that all RCs should affirm that Anglican orders are null and void. Anglicans may have a different opinion of the matter (and the intent, and the form).

The addition to the mix of Lutherans is outside my sphere of competence, though I can affirm that there are Continuing Anglican prelates who are in contact with functionally similar Lutheran bishops in Sweden. I’ve received from such a bishop.

GKC
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top