J
Joel_Tunnah
Guest
I’m wondering if any congregationalists/denominations currently use the Geneva Bible in their worship services. Or has this translation completely dropped out of liturgical use?
As far as I know it has. And I think it had by the 18th century at the latest. It would be interesting to know when the Puritans switched over to the KJV, but I don’t think it took more than a century at most.I’m wondering if any congregationalists/denominations currently use the Geneva Bible in their worship services. Or has this translation completely dropped out of liturgical use?
The 1560 Geneva bible contained the “apocrypha”. So, what are you referring to?You see this is why I don’t get sola scriptura. They take out a significant amount out of the Bible, and then say that it is the only guidelines needed…
Does anyone know if a reprint is available? I have a reprint of the original 1611 KJV.I think it was last printed in 1644
1560 FacsimileDoes anyone know if a reprint is available? I have a reprint of the original 1611 KJV.
Thanks for the link. I’m not going to purchase it, though. The customer reviews were not very good. The person who bought the leather Bible said that the binding came apart, and the person who bought the hardcover Bible said that the ink was too light. It does not appear to be worth the cost that they are charging.
Do you have any idea of the quality of the binding and the print?the link I gave above is a reprint of it.
If I were getting one, I would go with the one these people offer, simply because I have dealt with them, and they are very customer-friendly.
The Geneva Bible was a popular English translation of the Bible, in the days when the Americas were first being colonized by Europeans. It was one of the sources usedfor the language of the KJV.Hi
What is Geneva Bible? Is it different from the KJV?
Thanks
Is the language more archaic than that of the original KJV? For instance, this is from the original KJV.It has not, to my knowledge, been used in corporate worship for centuries, because the language is much less acessible to the reader.
Gen 1:1 In the beginning God created the Heauen, and the Earth.
Gen 1:2 And the earth was without forme, and voyd, and darkenesse was vpon the face of the deepe: and the Spirit of God mooued vpon the face of the waters.
Gen 1:3 And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.
Gen 1:4 And God saw the light, that it was good: and God diuided the light from the darkenesse.
Gen 1:5 And God called the light, Day, and the darknesse he called Night: and the euening and the morning were the first day.
HiIf I were getting one, I would go with the one these people offer, simply because I have dealt with them, and they are very customer-friendly.
It is not a reproduction of the original, however.
The Geneva Bible was a popular English translation of the Bible, in the days when the Americas were first being colonized by Europeans. It was one of the sources usedfor the language of the KJV.
It has not, to my knowledge, been used in corporate worship for centuries, because the language is much less acessible to the reader.
I just received the Hendrickson 1560 facsimile. I think this is a nice bible. It’s printed on heavy cream colored paper, with good opacity. The print is readable, even the small stuff, since the page size is 7" x 9 1/4". The problems with the some of the type were in the original, according to one reviewer.Thanks for the link. I’m not going to purchase it, though. The customer reviews were not very good…
I’m not aware of a denomination, per se that advocates using it. There are a few individual congregations that do advocate its usage. You do have to wander very far off of the beaten path to find them, though. (It is much easier to find a congregation that advocates KJV-only, than Geneva-only.)Or has this translation completely dropped out of liturgical use?