Do Calvinists believe that God loves everyone? Or does he love only the elect?

  • Thread starter Thread starter WesleyF
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
What do Calvinists believe about God’s love? Does he love everyone or only the elect?
God loves all that He has created, because it is His nature; but His redemptive love is given only to His people. God’s love is not a flat, general love that applies to everyone. If He loved all men equally, there could be no Hell, for if His love applied to the entirety of humanity as it does to His Church, then you would be forced to be a universalist.
 
Yes, He loves everyone but predestines some to eternal torment anyway.
That would be an inadequate understanding of the Reformed doctrine of predestination. God does not need to predestine anyone to eternal torment. All of mankind is born dead n sin, hostile to God, and on the path to the second death. God saves from that condition. That is predestination.
 
God loves all that He has created, because it is His nature; but His redemptive love is given only to His people. God’s love is not a flat, general love that applies to everyone. If He loved all men equally, there could be no Hell, for if His love applied to the entirety of humanity as it does to His Church, then you would be forced to be a universalist.
He loves all humanity, but gives us the freedom to accept or reject that love, and therefore the choice of our eternal destination. Believing God loves everyone does not require one to be a universalist.
 
He loves all humanity, but gives us the freedom to accept or reject that love, and therefore the choice of our eternal destination. Believing God loves everyone does not require one to be a universalist.
If God loves believers the same way He loves unbelievers, then there is no distinction between the two. How does that not result in universalism?
 
If God loves believers the same way He loves unbelievers, then there is no distinction between the two. How does that not result in universalism?
I thought I explained that above. We have freedom to accept or reject His love, to choose to spend eternity with him or not. It is not His live that differs, but our response to it.
 
That would be an inadequate understanding of the Reformed doctrine of predestination. God does not need to predestine anyone to eternal torment. All of mankind is born dead n sin, hostile to God, and on the path to the second death. God saves from that condition. That is predestination.
A distinction without a difference IMO. If He saves some without regard to their own will or cooperation in the matter but rather by divine fiat, then the rest are condemned to hell by His will in the same manner.
 
Let me ask this, where in the Bible is the term free will ever used? I’ll help you out it’s not. the term election and predestined is used a lot. Also if Adam the perfect man could not choose God what hope do we have to choose God. it says in Romans 3:10-11 that no one is righteous no seeks for God. So our free will will always choose not God Jonathan Edwards calls it a divine and supernatural light shines into the heart of the man and they have no choice but to accept God. God is love but at the same time God is holy and just and is angry about the unholiness and injustice of this world. So he has created vessels of wrath in order to show his glory and power to the whole world. if you look throughout the history of the Bible election is ever prevalant “Jacob i loved Esau i hated” “God hardened Pharohs heart” Pauls conversion. time and time again you see people that have no choice.
As it is written, There is none righteous, no, not one:
11There is none that understandeth, there is none that seeketh after God.
Paul is quoting Psalm 14…read it as it is written…you interpret this incorrectly…
<< Psalm 14 >>
King James Version
1> The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
2The LORD looked down from heaven upon the children of men, to see if there were any that did understand, and seek God.

3They are all gone aside, they are all together become filthy: there is none that doeth good, no, not one.
**4Have all the workers of iniquity no knowledge? who eat up my people as they eat bread, and call not upon the LORD. **
5There were they in great fear: for God is in the generation of the righteous.
6Ye have shamed the counsel of the poor, because the LORD is his refuge.
7Oh that the salvation of Israel were come out of Zion! when the LORD bringeth back the captivity of his people, Jacob shall rejoice, and Israel shall be glad.
There are God’s people that are the generation of the righteous…you should study Romans more carefully…
 
In this sense, would it be okay for someone to want to learn to “hate as God hates”?
I know what you are saying, and I agree. But the person who said that said it for ‘effect’, to shock the people who heard it.
Take my word for it.
 
A distinction without a difference IMO. If He saves some without regard to their own will or cooperation in the matter but rather by divine fiat, then the rest are condemned to hell by His will in the same manner.
This is the point of TULIP basically. If you came to the congregation of Calvinist thinking, you are indoctrinated into “their” theory thus “saved” by predestination. If you leave, it then becomes “we’ll he/her were not really one of the predestined to begin with” 🤷

Its complete folly. And all the good talk comes right down to this point! Another marketing scheme in the realm of Christian religion, for monetary gain. Makes for a long boring converstation on the internet, in truth, in person their arguements fall apart like sand through your hands.

But hey its Christian, so if it leads Souls to Christ, and deeper into the Faith? So be it!👍😃
 
I know what you are saying, and I agree. But the person who said that said it for ‘effect’, to shock the people who heard it.
Take my word for it.
I wasn’t doubting you. I’m sorry if it came across that way! :o
 
Also if Adam the perfect man could not choose God what hope do we have to choose God. .
JL: Adam the perfect man did have a choice to chose God. We all have a choice to chose God or reject him any day. God gave Adam and Eve, both in a state of PERFECT GRACE, a choice to eat or not to eat. They were told by God to eat is death. They rejected God by eating.
 
it says in Romans 3:10-11 that no one is righteous no seeks for God.
kra130;8803780:
So our free will will always choose not God
JL: I would say we can chose God by our free will. Yet we can’t please or live for God by our own free will. It is thru God’s grace by which we can FREELY chose, please, remain and serve God.
Jonathan Edwards calls it a divine and supernatural light shines into the heart of the man and they have no choice but to accept God.
JL: Well I will ask you were in scripture does it say we have no choice but to accept? What kind of love FORCES itself on someone? Especially when they would reject that love if they could chose FREELY? If God forces against one’s will. Then would it be just and loving to create billions of souls He has no intention of saving from eternal torment. Souls who may have never known anything but oppression, hunger and slavery.
God is love but at the same time God is holy and just and is angry about the unholiness and injustice of this world.
JL: Well you say man’s fee will will always not chose God. So God would be angry and condemn to hell those unholy men. When He knows they can’t be anything else without His grace. Grace God has no intention of giving them. Is that just and loving?
So he has created vessels of wrath in order to show his glory and power to the whole world.
JL: Do you really believe God created billions of human beings for no purpose than to throw them into eternal torment? Just to show his glory and power. That doesn’t show anything to me but His power. Where is His glory in creating souls for eternal torment? Where is His love for His creation in that theory?
if you look throughout the history of the Bible election is ever prevalant “Jacob i loved Esau i hated” “God hardened Pharohs heart” Pauls conversion. time and time again you see people that have no choice.
JL: Where does it say Paul had not choice.
 
I thought I explained that above. We have freedom to accept or reject His love, to choose to spend eternity with him or not. It is not His live that differs, but our response to it.
Does God save man, or does man save himself? If man saves himself, that is, makes the choice to save himself, then yes, your position would make sense. However, Scripture does not present such a scenario, but rather, presents a God who saves a people unto Himself. If it is God who saves, then His love for His people must differ, or His love would save everyone.
 
A distinction without a difference IMO. If He saves some without regard to their own will or cooperation in the matter but rather by divine fiat, then the rest are condemned to hell by His will in the same manner.
Not at all, fhansen. The distinction is quite clear. The view of Reformed thought on salvation, as evidenced in this thread, is that God randomly chooses whether each individual is predestined to Hell or to Heaven. This is just a strawman. The fact that they are condemned to Hell is based on their own rebellion and sin, not on God’s arbitrary choice to make them rebellious. All of humanity is by nature in such a state (original sin). God makes the choice (as is His right, not as if God owed it to anyone) to call a people out of that darkness into His marvelous light. The only situation in which God has to actively make a decision, is to decide to save. His choice to not save some, is by no means the causation of their damnation. Their own sin and wickedness is.

Free will is not about free choices…mankind makes his or her own choice about everything, everyday. But man chooses according to his nature…which is either unregenerate in Adam, or freed from the bondage of original sin, by the Holy Spirit.
 
Not at all, fhansen. The distinction is quite clear. The view of Reformed thought on salvation, as evidenced in this thread, is that God randomly chooses whether each individual is predestined to Hell or to Heaven. This is just a strawman. The fact that they are condemned to Hell is based on their own rebellion and sin, not on God’s arbitrary choice to make them rebellious. All of humanity is by nature in such a state (original sin). God makes the choice (as is His right, not as if God owed it to anyone) to call a people out of that darkness into His marvelous light. The only situation in which God has to actively make a decision, is to decide to save. His choice to not save some, is by no means the causation of their damnation. Their own sin and wickedness is.

Free will is not about free choices…mankind makes his or her own choice about everything, everyday. But man chooses according to his nature…which is either unregenerate in Adam, or freed from the bondage of original sin, by the Holy Spirit.
Sure, but he has no choice but to be unregenerate-and even Adam had no choice but to fall, from my understanding of Calvinist theology. So the unregenerate was created for eternal torment from the beginning!
 
Questions to pose to Calvinist regarding the topic in order to illuminate Calvinist doctrine!

Before Satan fell, he was an angel.

Did Satan have free will?

If God for-knew Satan would fall, could Satan have done anything but fall?

Did God cause Satan to fall?

I think this would get to the heart of the matter in showing how a Calvinist would explain these questions!

Also a discussion of what is meant by free will, would be helpful!

No Catholic would say that man can choose God apart from His grace already working in him/her!

God saves sinners out of Grace, Love and Mercy. We cannot earn salvation. Apart from grace there is no salvation. In terms of conditions, as a Catholic I could say that it is by Divine Mercy alone. By grace God touches the sinners heart, and calls him towards repentance. This grace cannot be merited: it proceeds solely from the Love and mercy of God. Man may receive or reject this invitation of God, he may turn towards God or remain in sin. Grace does not constrain mans free will.
Thus assisted the sinner is disposed for salvation from sin; he believes in the revelation and promises of God, he fears God’s justice hopes in his mercy, trusts that God will be merciful to him for Christ’s sake, begins to love God as the source of all justice hates and detests his sins.

This disposition is followed by justification itself, which consists not in the mere remission of sins, but in the sanctification and renewal of the inner man by the voluntary reception of God’s grace and gifts where as a** man becomes just** instead of unjust.

First of all, a quick overview of what free will is.
We are not free to will what we want freely. For example no matter how much I will myself to breathe underwater, I will never be able to breathe underwater! Free will has its limitations, in which I can only freely choose things according to my capacity as a created being!

I am free to do what I was set apart for as a human being to do, Love and Worship our Creator! How? By the mercy and grace of our Creator!

Before the fall, Adam freely chose to do what he was Created to do, Love and Worship God!

After the fall, sin entered man, because of sin we were in bondage to sin, it turned us ever inward towards ourselves and away from our Creator! We freely chose to turn ourselves over to that bondage! Through Christ, we are now freed from bondage and no longer turned inward, now we have been given the grace needed to freely choose what we were made for again, love and worship God! If not for the grace merited by Jesus Christ, we would still be in bondage to sin.

I think another thread may be helpful to understanding the Development of the Doctrine of Substitutionary Atonement. Moral Influence, Ransom View, Christus Victor, and Satisfaction, Penal Substitution, Governmental, and Scapegoating views.

The prevailing view of Eastern Orthodox and to a degree Eastern Catholics is the Christus Victor view of Atonement. “Eastern Catholics correct me if I’m wrong please!”

The Latin Rite (Roman) Catholic view is the Satisfaction view of Atonement!

Penal Substitution is the one Developed by John Calvin

Governmental View is one developed by Jonathan Edwards.

Scapegoating was the view of William Tyndale

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atonement_in_Christianity
 
Not at all, fhansen. The distinction is quite clear. The view of Reformed thought on salvation, as evidenced in this thread, is that God randomly chooses whether each individual is predestined to Hell or to Heaven. This is just a strawman. The fact that they are condemned to Hell is based on their own rebellion and sin, not on God’s arbitrary choice to make them rebellious. All of humanity is by nature in such a state (original sin). God makes the choice (as is His right, not as if God owed it to anyone) to call a people out of that darkness into His marvelous light. The only situation in which God has to actively make a decision, is to decide to save. His choice to not save some, is by no means the causation of their damnation. Their own sin and wickedness is.

Free will is not about free choices…mankind makes his or her own choice about everything, everyday. But man chooses according to his nature…which is either unregenerate in Adam, or freed from the bondage of original sin, by the Holy Spirit.
Many Protestants now a days say you must BELIEVE in order to RECEIVE, but If you look at the Calvinist camp it is RECEIVE in order to BELIEVE!

Catholic’s can say this "Sure man chooses according to his nature, that is why** grace works in the heart of the sinner to move him towards repentance and that grace cant be earned, it proceeds solely from the Love and Mercy of God!**

Don’t Confuse us with the Arminians or Charles Finney please!

I think what calls into question God’s justice, (in calvinist theology) is not that He only chooses to save SOME, but in fact that He chooses to save ANY. If all men are unjust, wouldn’t it cast a shadow on God’s justice to save ANY?

“There is no one righteous, not even one;
there is no one who understands; there is no one who seeks God.
All have turned away, they have together become worthless;
there is no one who does good, not even one.”

The fact that God saves ANY calls into question God’s Justice apart from free will, does it not?

Let me guess. Calvinist are conditioned to say this “Justice is reserved for God alone” Ok, then why are calvinist always screaming about “God is Just so He must punish sin.” It seems contradictory to me 🤷
 
From my perspective, it is a free will to** reject** salvation, not receive it. But that said, I’m just curious why you think that to believe one is imputed righteousness necessarily means that one gives up free will, and cannot reject grace.

Jon
I didn’t say that exactly but, I do think along the lines of what you wrote. Wow, you read my mind.

If the Imputation is truly a real imputation, you would not have the ability to sin, being that Christ would never choose sin. So I think that there is no room to choose sin if one truly received Christ righteousness in full by imputation. Obviously I don’t believe that one is Imputed Christ Righteousness, I’m Catholic!

I don’t believe one gives up free will. What I was getting at was, faith is a gift!
If faith is a gift in the first place, then it is something the Spirit gives prior to the act of mans will by grace! If that is by imputation, is there any room for a free will decision? I would say NO! Many Protestants I talk to say otherwise.

This is outside of my DEPOSIT of faith being, that I believe in a Grace that moves the sinner towards repentance, but does not constrain mans free will!

So what type of Calvinism fits your theology? Just Curious!
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lapsarianism
 
Does God save man, or does man save himself? If man saves himself, that is, makes the choice to save himself, then yes, your position would make sense. However, Scripture does not present such a scenario, but rather, presents a God who saves a people unto Himself. If it is God who saves, then His love for His people must differ, or His love would save everyone.
Wow, I had not thought of it this way…so…as a Protestant of some sort…tell me how is it you see that salvation coming…one paradigm I know is this…

You must hear Scripture, Faith comes from hearing…Romans 10
You must respond…confess, also Romans 10

you are regenerated…

Now rather than believing I understand your position…outline for me how you got saved…use some Scripture for me to understand so I can see what you are saying and weigh your position…👍
 
Wow, I had not thought of it this way…so…as a Protestant of some sort…tell me how is it you see that salvation coming…one paradigm I know is this…

You must hear Scripture, Faith comes from hearing…Romans 10
You must respond…confess, also Romans 10

you are regenerated…

Now rather than believing I understand your position…outline for me how you got saved…use some Scripture for me to understand so I can see what you are saying and weigh your position…👍
Sure, Coptic. You must hear Scripture, per your Romans 10 reference. Scripture is preached and carries with it the power of the Holy Spirit, who calls His people through that word and changes their hearts through it. That is to say, the word is the means by which the Spirit works in the heart and grants the new birth to whomsoever He will. Once the heart is regenerated, it then becomes the response of the individual to confess and believe. So it would be (1) Preach the word (2) Regeneration (3) Confession of Christ.

I’m not saved yet, though, cause Jesus hasn’t returned!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top