W
WCH
Guest
A pickle doesn’t have a spirit either. So what’s your point?A pickle does not have free will - the change is chemical, not spiritual.
A pickle doesn’t have a spirit either. So what’s your point?A pickle does not have free will - the change is chemical, not spiritual.
I would submit that by definition, different terms mean different things. That doesn’t mean the words have changed.Open letter to WCH: You claim that the rebellion did not change the lexicon, yet we each use different terms that may or may not describe the same thing - all from the same scripture.
Those verses are why Protestants believe in the need for the church, and for those men God sends to teach the church.Please look at Nehemiah 8:5-8 and Acts 8:26-35. Ezra and the priests had to give the sense of the law so that the people could understand. The angel of the Lord sent Philip to explain scripture to the Ethiopian eunuch - who had what you claim is “self-interpreting” scripture. The bible teaches that scripture must have authoritative interpretation.
Wanna bet?If you are truly searching for the truth, remain here and dialog. Your faith in SS will be shaken since, without authoritative interpretation, it is a foundation of sand. Word.
The very identical way everyone ACTUALLY IS as taught by Christ and the Apostles in the Bible.=lampalm;7921909]How is a Catholic declared righteous before God?
Will you cite any scripture which states that Christians are not clean?A soul has to be clean .
Will you cite any scripture which states that at death, Christians have an attachment to sin?We can’t have any attachment to sin at death and bring that into heaven.
See Rom 7:21-23. What principles does Paul say are present in him.I will just say to you WCH, if righteousnes is only external as you ,and the Calvinist believes( which is that sin and sinfullness is still present with-in the soul)
By the will, mercy, and grace of God.I would like to know how you will ever enter heaven…
Rev 21:27 says that the only people who will enter heaven are those people named in the Lamb’s book of life, and no one else.…for nothing unclean can enter in, Scripture says so (Rev 21-27).
You know very well that I said it is your assertions that are straw men, and that you can’t prove them. And obviously you can’t, or you would have by now. You’ve had ample time.Calvin’s theology is not a strawman.
Ro 7:21-23 is speaking here of our propensity toward sin which still remains with us even after our justification and sanctification has removed all sin from the soul through Baptism and has made us righteous (holy) as Christ is holy(righteous) The Trinity removes sin from the soul through the infusion of grace at Baptism.See Rom 7:21-23. What principles does Paul say are present in him.
By the will, mercy, and grace of God.
Rev 21:27 says that the only people who will enter heaven are those people named in the Lamb’s book of life, and no one else.
Exactly, and you said this about Calvinism earlier:Ro 7:21-23 is speaking here of our propensity toward sin which still remains with us even after our justification and sanctification has removed all sin from the soul…
Putting your two statements together, one sees that what you’re saying about Calvinism, is also true of Roman Catholicism.I will just say to you WCH, if righteousnes is only external as you ,and the Calvinist believes( which is that sin and sinfullness is still present with-in the soul)
Rev 21:27 also says that the only people who will enter heaven are those people named in the Lamb’s book of life, and no one else.Rev21:27 says 'Nothing profane shall enter into it , nor anyone who is a liar or has done a detestable act…"
Peace, Carlan
No it isn’t! How can you enter into heaven if your sin is only covered over by a beautiful cloak.Exactly, and you said this about Calvinism earlier:
Putting your two statements together, one sees that what you’re saying about Calvinism, is also true of Roman Catholicism.
Yes it is.No it isn’t!
C’mon Carlan, my sin is forgiven. Listen to Scripture: “when you were dead in your transgressions and the uncircumcision of your flesh, He made you alive together with Him, having forgiven us all our transgressions, having canceled out the certificate of debt consisting of decrees against us, which was hostile to us; and He has taken it out of the way, having nailed it to the cross” (Col 2:13-14). That’s what Calvin believed. That our sins are forgiven by God.How can you enter into heaven if your sin is only covered over by a beautiful cloak. Isn’t that what "imputed righteousness does? You still have the ugly sin under your cloak of righeousness.
Carlan, what part of Col 2:13, and the statement, "He…has forgiven us all out transgressions" are you in doubt over.WCH, God wants you to get rid of those dirty hidden rags. So much has been said here to the truth of it ,and yet your mind seems so jammed shut.
I’m sorry, I pray, Peace, Carlan
A Christian will still be sanctified.How can you enter into heaven if your sin is only covered over by a beautiful cloak.
Isn’t that what "imputed righteousness does?
Proof?Salvation is a process; NOT single act by God or by man.
We do seem to just go back and forth on this one , it seems almost impossible to have discussion that makes sense to each other.Yes it is.
C’mon Carlan, my sin is forgiven. Listen to Scripture: “when you were dead in your transgressions and the uncircumcision of your flesh, He made you alive together with Him, having forgiven us all our transgressions, having canceled out the certificate of debt consisting of decrees against us, which was hostile to us; and He has taken it out of the way, having nailed it to the cross” (Col 2:13-14). That’s what Calvin believed. That our sins are forgiven by God.
Carlan, what part of Col 2:13, and the statement, "He…has forgiven us all out transgressions" are you in doubt over.
That’s what Calvinists believe: God’s forgiveness of sins.
What’s the difficulty, Carlan?We do seem to just go back and forth on this one , it seems almost impossible to have discussion that makes sense to each other.
Such can be very frustrating when trying to reason the imputed justification belief. Goodnight and Peace to all. Carlan
Actually, I was talking about the meaning of the word “baptize”. It is used to describe a submersion that fundamentally changes the subject of the immersion.I’m talking about pickles guanophore, and not the soul; therefore, it’s impossible for me to be denying anything about the soul.
You were talking about pickles, and how pickles aren’t cucumbers, but I straightened that out for you, and now you understand that pickles are cucumbers.Actually, I was talking about the meaning of the word “baptize”. It is used to describe a submersion that fundamentally changes the subject of the immersion.
“Infusion” is a Latin term that refers to the placing of the grace of the HS within a person when they are justified in baptism.Where do those passage say you are “infused with righteousness?”
WCH has affirmed that he does, indeed, embrace sanctification. He probably also believes in final theosis, but would not call it “purgatory”.I will just say to you WCH, if righteousnes is only external as you ,and the Calvinist believes( which is that sin and sinfullness is still present with-in the soul) I would like to know how you will ever enter heaven, for nothing unclean can enter in, Scripture says so (Rev 21-27) Don’t know if you, as a Calvinist, believe in the purification process, but I would say if you don’t change your thinking on the whole subject that would be your hope…In that state, the mind would be changed for sure! We pray, Peace, Carlan
It can be confusing. Yes, sanctification does require the continual “pouring” of the HS into our lives. We are to be vessels fit for the Master’s use, and be able to contain that “poured” grace, and live it out.I think I am a little confused…
Infused righteousness sounds like sanctification?
Edit: Do Catholics believe that they are not righteous until final sanctification?