Do Catholics HAVE to use a catholic version of the bible?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DeborahLK
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
D

DeborahLK

Guest
Apart from those 7 books, is there such a difference? Many of my catholic friends use the KJV which is supposed to be a protestant version… so do you HAVE to use a catholic version of the scriptures? And in the end, what difference does it make? :confused:
 
Apart from those 7 books, is there such a difference? Many of my catholic friends use the KJV which is supposed to be a protestant version… so do you HAVE to use a catholic version of the scriptures? And in the end, what difference does it make? :confused:
Yes, one must use an authorized version of the bible. No protestant translation is authorized.
 
Yes, one must use an authorized version of the bible. No protestant translation is authorized.
👍

OP…
There are a couple of concerns besides the “7 books”.
One is that in addition to the seven complete books missing, there are parts of two others missing…One is Daniel and I can’t recall the other.
Second - and more important would be the matter of notes and commentaries included in a particular version.

That said…If the only bible a person was able to get a hold of was a “protestant” version…well that would be better than none at all, but if one can acquire an authorized Catholic bible, they really need to do so.

Peace
James
 
As I understand it… there are vastly different translations with regards to tense, context, and especially footnotes. For example, I have read that there are Protestant Bibles that use the word “elders”; whereas in Catholic Bibles, the word “priests” is used. I’d say that’s a pretty huge difference in just that one example.

Do you go to Sunday worship service to hear an elder preach? Or do you go to Sunday Mass to celebrate the Liturgy of the Eucharist with a priest? In both cases you get up, and go to a special building to worship God and His Son; Jesus Christ. Kind of the same, but not really. Know what I mean?

A faithful Catholic will want all the materials needed for proper study and learning. I strenuously recommend a Catholic Bible if you want a FAITHFUL interpetation.
 
Tobit happens to be one of my favorite books!

I wonder why Catholics you know use a non-Catholic Bible. It isn’t as if they are not available!

Incidentally, I get my Bibles blessed by a priest since I use them for prayer. One authorized by the Church of England just doesn’t seem to go with that!
 
If I may, you can get the King James Version of the Bible with the D-Cs. Also, the NRSV has them as well. If you’re looking for a Catholic Bible with the poetic beauty of the KJV, might I humbly suggest the Douay-Rheims(Challoner)
 
Apart from those 7 books, is there such a difference? Many of my catholic friends use the KJV which is supposed to be a protestant version… so do you HAVE to use a catholic version of the scriptures? And in the end, what difference does it make? :confused:
For official church functions you should use a catholic bible, but for casual reading a protestant bible is fine. I use a NIV study bible which discusses the various scriptures and have drawings in it regarding architecture in the old testament. For prayer I use the St. Joseph Bible which is a very good reading bible. The only bible that I’m aware of that is a bad translation is the Jehovah’s Witnesses bible which changes some key words to fit their belief that the Trinity is false.

Here is a list of Official catholic Translations:
forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?t=110845

americancatholic.org/Newsletters/CU/ac0704.asp
 
Apart from those 7 books, is there such a difference? Many of my catholic friends use the KJV which is supposed to be a protestant version… so do you HAVE to use a catholic version of the scriptures? And in the end, what difference does it make? :confused:
We should always, read in a Catholic approved Bible. Single words can change, the meaning of the whole Scripture passage.We also need to look in the CCC to see the Churches teaching, of the Scriptures. Another good place, I have found is Haydock’s Catholic Bible Commentaries, to understand better the passage. The original King James had over 700 translation mistakes. Yes, many are fixed, but there still are some. Duewy Rhemes(don’t know if spelling is right) is one of the oldest, translations,one I recommend Catholics to be reading from.When Jesus, was arrested and the Temple guards, ask who was “Jesus of Nazareth”, the KJV says he said “I am he” in contrast to" I am" (Yawhew,God), and every one fell to their knees. Jesus, was proclaiming to be, God in the Flesh, that is why every one feel to their knees. Big difference, in translations of the Bible.Most people miss that.Why so important, to use a Catholic approved Translation. An do the research, of what the Church interpret, the Scripture to mean.It is not for individual interpretation.
God Bless
 
It is really the best to use a Catholic Bible. One may not think those 7 books are important but they are the inspired word of God and no man had authority to remove them. If you want to read the psalms or a passage from the Gospels for Bible study, a Protestant version could do, but in order to really get the whole of the Bible, you need a whole Bible. Moreso, the wording in some places has been changed.
 
Apart from those 7 books, is there such a difference? Many of my catholic friends use the KJV which is supposed to be a protestant version… so do you HAVE to use a catholic version of the scriptures? And in the end, what difference does it make? :confused:
It’s not the text, although the KJV isn’t a great translation, it’s the titles and notes. Yes, use a Bible approved by the Church or you will get heresy creeping into your Bible study.

BTW, the actual KJV had all the books and still does when printed in Great Britain, iirc. All Bibles had all the books pretty much until 1885.
 
We have about 20 different versions of the Bible in the house and a few are non-Catholic translations.

To the OP, read whatever tranlation or version you haveright now. But at your first opportunity, get a Catholic version. You are missing not just the 7 books, but sections of others, and the translators point of view which is woven throughout the Bible. If you are reading a version with notes and commentary, you will definately want a Catholic point of view.

I think you can order a new Bible right here on the CA site.
 
Tobit happens to be one of my favorite books!

I wonder why Catholics you know use a non-Catholic Bible. It isn’t as if they are not available!

Incidentally, I get my Bibles blessed by a priest since I use them for prayer. One authorized by the Church of England just doesn’t seem to go with that!
Many Catholics may not understand there is a difference. My mother-in-law is non-denominational now, but even when she was still Catholic I don’t think she had a Catholic Bible in her home. My husband had one that he received as a Confirmation gift from someone else, but all of the Bibles his mom bought for him were Protestant ones. I think she went into “Christian bookstores” and figured that everything in there was OK for Catholics too (when actually a lot of it is blatantly anti-Catholic!)

If she had known better, she might not be Protestant today. She has spoken quite often about how “unbiblical” so many Catholic things are…well, of course, if the translations she’s using are so, um, selective. 🤷
 
If she had known better, she might not be Protestant today. She has spoken quite often about how “unbiblical” so many Catholic things are…well, of course, if the translations she’s using are so, um, selective. 🤷
Excellent point! This is also why it is important to have a Bible with accurate commentary and notes.
 
Yes, one must use an authorized version of the bible. No protestant translation is authorized.
Can you cite a source for this? Certainly an authorized version must be used liturgically, but I was not aware of such a restriction officially for personal reading. I understand that a Catholic version is preferred for many reasons, but to say that a Catholic must use an authorized version of the Bible just doesn’t seem right to me. There are many reasons why a Catholic might prefer to use, for example, a NIV Bible when having an apologetics discussion with an Evangelical. If we insist upon using our own Bible, we will lose credibility because Protestants will get the idea that their Bible says something different that ours, thus leading them to believe that we have a “different” Bible.
 
I know this is directed to 1ke, but I hope you don’t mind my commenting…
Can you cite a source for this? Certainly an authorized version must be used liturgically, but I was not aware of such a restriction officially for personal reading. I understand that a Catholic version is preferred for many reasons, but to say that a Catholic must use an authorized version of the Bible just doesn’t seem right to me.
I believe that the council of Trent forbade Catholics from possessing any bible not authorized by the Church. Protestant versions of the Bible would fall under that category.
Of course today the Church does not enforce the same level of “anathema” on this matter, but I don’t think that the general injunction has been lifted.
I’m sure 1ke will be able to clarify this further.
There are many reasons why a Catholic might prefer to use, for example, a NIV Bible when having an apologetics discussion with an Evangelical. If we insist upon using our own Bible, we will lose credibility because Protestants will get the idea that their Bible says something different that ours, thus leading them to believe that we have a “different” Bible.
You make a good point here, but I would also suggest that in such a conversation it is not always a bad thing to demonstrate that their bible “says something different than ours.” Far from “losing credibility”, such exposure should prompt a desire to dig deeper into scripture, possibly looking at the original languages etc and can be quite profitable from an apologetic standpoint.

Peace
James
 
Can you cite a source for this? Certainly an authorized version must be used liturgically, but I was not aware of such a restriction officially for personal reading. I understand that a Catholic version is preferred for many reasons, but to say that a Catholic must use an authorized version of the Bible just doesn’t seem right to me. There are many reasons why a Catholic might prefer to use, for example, a NIV Bible when having an apologetics discussion with an Evangelical. If we insist upon using our own Bible, we will lose credibility because Protestants will get the idea that their Bible says something different that ours, thus leading them to believe that we have a “different” Bible.
The people with the lack of credibility are the Protestants and it is they who have a “different” Bible. The reason to use an authorized edition is to be able to give correct translations and interpretations.

It’s our Scripture. The Church precedes Scripture. The Church selected the writings that went into Scripture. The Church is the only one who knows what it means, because only the Church has been consistently interpreting Scripture, Her Own Scripture, for 2000 years.

That’s credibility.
 
The people with the lack of credibility are the Protestants and it is they who have a “different” Bible. The reason to use an authorized edition is to be able to give correct translations and interpretations.

It’s our Scripture. The Church precedes Scripture. The Church selected the writings that went into Scripture. The Church is the only one who knows what it means, because only the Church has been consistently interpreting Scripture, Her Own Scripture, for 2000 years.

That’s credibility.
I don’t disagree, but you have to meet them where they are or you will get nowhere with them. If you come into the discussion with a attitude that “your Bible isn’t good enough”, you lack credibility (not your Bible). Generally speaking, in dealing with Protestants, you’ll be discussing the New Testament. Aside from a very few problematic translations, the Protestant New Testament is exactly the same as any Catholic New Testament and is perfectly adequate for general reading. For me, after we’re talking on the same page, it is helpful to show how the same passage is translated in a Catholic Bible and to offer another way of looking at things.

I’m not talking about in depth Bible study here, for which I think good notes are critical. I am just referring to reading and discussing the Bible. No Bible is going to be perfectly translated, and even if it is perfectly translated, it is not complete. That’s why we have the magesterium. Even the Catholic approved New American Bible gives us “Rejoice, oh highly favored woman”.

I’m pretty sure I’m doing nothing wrong if I read some passages out of an NIV, or if I prefer the psalms from the King James Bible. I even own books, which contain an imprimatur, that quote both the NIV and King James Bibles.
 
I’m pretty sure I’m doing nothing wrong if I read some passages out of an NIV, or if I prefer the psalms from the King James Bible. I even own books, which contain an imprimatur, that quote both the NIV and King James Bibles.
Then you have authorized versions, so what’s the argument?
 
Apart from those 7 books, is there such a difference? Many of my catholic friends use the KJV which is supposed to be a protestant version… so do you HAVE to use a catholic version of the scriptures? And in the end, what difference does it make? :confused:
Yes, I would highly encourage using a Catholic Bible. Some of the wording in the protestant Bibles were translated in a way that teaches against Catholic truth. Many also have study notes that do not teach Biblical truths. A lot of these notes are different with each study Bible and are confusing to protestants let alone teach Catholic truths.

I would encourage your Catholic friends to get a Catholic Bible also.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top