R
Robert_in_SD
Guest
Yes, you are.Robert I’m not imposing 21st century thought into this.
You’re falsely ascribing a theological meaning to an ancient token of respect. Your position is absurd.I’m speaking strictly from a theological perspective. I understand fully what the practices and customs may have been at that time. But the fact remains these types of practices didn’t creep into the church until the Pope was officially given the same title the emperor of Rome used. In that regard it makes sense that folks may have done it.
What about greeting with a chaste kiss?.. Kissing the knuckle is pretty darn chaste.What I’m saying is if we read scripture we never find anyone who was a leader in the church accept any type of salutation that involved bowing or kissing because that person was submitting to the others authority.
That was not true in ancient times. People kissed rings and bowed to authority of all kinds, even pious jews. The theological confusion you seem to have is in your assumption that any token of respect or acknowledgement of authority - temporal or otherwise - equates with adoration. It simply does not.This would include the Angels. They simply did not stand for it as the only person who deserves that type of greeting is Christ and GOD.
People touched the hem of Peter’s cloak for healing, etc. There were pious signs of respect even in the earliest Church. The fact that ring kissing evolved in Western culture as a token of respect for one’s office has nothing to do with Catholic theological notions regarding the divinity of the pope. The pope is a man who holds a great and responsible office in the Church. That position commands our respect. It is not adoration to kiss a ring out of respect.We see Jesus HIMSELF accepting these gestures but not his disciples. I don’t have a problem with saying that accepted standards of greetings would be used in the church. We read of the Christian kiss all the time. We offer one another a sign of peace which mostly today is a handshake unless it’s family in which case I kiss my wife and daughter.
The ring is a fisherman’s ring. To Catholics, it represents the authority that Christ gave to the Church about 2,000 years ago. But, if I saw it your way, I suppose I would have the same reservations.But I personally have a problem with kissing a man’s hand because it has a ring that represents some authority he was given by the Roman Emperor 1500 years ago.
So, can I assume that if you ever came to see the Catholic Church as the Church founded by Jesus Christ you would have no problem kissing the pope’s ring? Or is it just the whole concept of ring-kissing that gives you the heebie jeebies?I don’t kiss the popes ring because I don’t submit to his personal authority. I submit to the authority of the church in which Christ alone is our leader.
Peace,
-Robert