M
Michael68
Guest
Yes, they doLike the title says do they reject her immaculate conception, her virginity, her assumption and our other Marian dogmas.
Yes, they doLike the title says do they reject her immaculate conception, her virginity, her assumption and our other Marian dogmas.
No thatâs not true, thatâs not true at all.I hope dronald will correct me if Iâm wrong, but I think there are even some Evangelicals who deny the Resurrection.
Usually Evangelicals will say the woman is the Church. What do Catholics believe that the crown of 12 stars represents?Do Evangelicals accept that the unnamed âwomanâ in Rev. 12:1 is Mary? Maybe some do, but I donât think they all do.
Iâm just considering how much emphasis and importance is put on her right now, and every Sunday for Catholics; and yet widely ignored by Paul.I think this is one of the problems of Sola Scriptura. The Acts of the Apostles is the acts of the Apostles. Mary is mentioned in this book but the book is about the early days of the Church. The Epistles are written to existing churches, church leaders or individual Christians. Each Epistle has a specific purpose. None of them is written to convey the entirety of the Christian Faith or all facts related in any way to the Faith. Joseph just disappears from Scripture. Most of the Apostles get very little said of them and yet they were Apostles. Scripture is missing a lot of information that would be at least interesting if not edifying to your faith.
I sincerely apologize, but Iâm misunderstanding where your conclusion logically follows.Have you considered this problem if Mary wasnât immaculately conceived?
- Did Jesus need saving? I would assume you would say ânoâ, since God doesnât need saving.
- If Jesus needed âprotectionâ or saving from Original Sin from Mary, then was He really God?
- Rejection of the IC undermines the claim of Jesusâ divinity, because salvation must be applied to Jesus to keep Him free from Original Sin.
The woman gave birth to Jesus. The Church didnât give birth to Jesus.Usually Evangelicals will say the woman is the Church. What do Catholics believe that the crown of 12 stars represents?
The point being is it allows for an attack on His divinity, since Jesus would need God to protect/sanctify Him from Original Sin. Non-Christians will point to this as evidence that He could not be divine (or at least not consubstantial with the Father) since He needed sanctification.I sincerely apologize, but Iâm misunderstanding where your conclusion logically follows.
If God can protect a woman born of two sinful parents from original sin, then surely Jesus was protected as He was born from the Holy Spirit.
Since we are discussing the mystery of the Incarnatiin, and the Infinite and Eternal God, âHe neededâ to follow none of your " the Holy Sirit (Himself God),needed" , the Holy God who became incarnate COULD enter our humanity as He decidedâŚyour propositions of what had to have taken place make no sense to me, no most Evangelicals, I would dare say.Thereâs the problem. The Holy Spirit has to apply some sanctification to Jesus to keep Him free of sin. So it undermines the claim that Jesus is divine, because He needed sanctification/preservation from the Holy Spirit.
That doesnât fly. The angel says she âwillâ become pregnant, not that she is pregnant. A married woman about to enter her husbandâs home wouldnât be confused about how she will get pregnant. There is nothing in Scripture that says Mary became pregnant right then. Only Catholic tradition holds that, do you ascribe to Catholic tradition?
Actually it does. Itâs just not blatantly evident, but it does. All Marian doctrines are actually about Jesus. They declare His divinity.
Jesus, as divine, preserves Mary from sin, so that He is born in a pure Ark and tabernacle. Mary, as ever-Virgin, declares the truth that Jesus is God because His conception was divine and that no one has entered the gate that God has entered. Jesus saves His mother from decay and raises her into Heaven, which shows He will do the same for us. Jesus, as divine God and Davidic King, makes His mother the Queen Mother of heaven as we see foreshadowed in the OT.
He needed sanctification applied to Him if He needed to be preserved from Original Sin from Mary.
I donât understand, which is it? You mentioned three different things the 12 could mean.The woman gave birth to Jesus. The Church didnât give birth to Jesus.
The 12 stars are usually understood as the 12 patriarchs, or the 12 apostles, or 12 being the number of completion.
I would say mostly yes. It isnât so much that they donât love her, especially on Christmas, but they dismiss her importance.Like the title says do they reject her immaculate conception, her virginity, her assumption and our other Marian dogmas.
I am also confused by this teaching. Which is it?The woman gave birth to Jesus. The Church didnât give birth to Jesus.
The 12 stars are usually understood as the 12 patriarchs, or the 12 apostles, or 12 being the number of completion.
Just curious? Why must it be narrowed to one, this is a vision/,its not actual events, it could get mean something more meaninful, our own limits perhaps blinds us to deeper insight.I am also confused by this teaching. Which is it?
Being an Evangelical myself, I wouldnât consider this an accurate picture of how most Evangelicals think of Mary.I would say mostly yes. It isnât so much that they donât love her, especially on Christmas, but they dismiss her importance.
I think that this is a mistake. To say of any woman, âOh, she is just the motherâ demeans motherhood.
The message given is, âShe was just a girl. She was just a mother. She was not all that important, She was just a vessel.â
All this is dismissive of the love, the pain, the suffering of every mother.
I hope you will elaborate on this, as to how Evangelicals do think of her. We know she is considered as a role model for faithfulness and trust in God. What other ways have Evangelicals been blessed?Being an Evangelical myself, I wouldnât consider this an accurate picture of how most Evangelicals think of Mary.
I can only write about my own thoughts of Mary.Just curious? Why must it be narrowed to one, this is a vision/,its not actual events, it could get mean something more meaninful, our own limits perhaps blinds us to deeper insight.
Iâm not sure one can ascribe one understanding to a book of visions, visions of deep symbolic meaning.
It could all three, it could be only one or none, how one gives meaning is where we should look, for you, the.Marian dogmas fit, for me/they do notâŚwhy must there be an ly one meaning?
I am not speaking for Abide With Me, just my thoughts.I hope you will elaborate on this, as to how Evangelicals do think of her. We know she is considered as a role model for faithfulness and trust in God. What other ways have Evangelicals been blessed?
I canât speak for abide , but I will try to elaborate ,I hope you will elaborate on this, as to how Evangelicals do think of her. We know she is considered as a role model for faithfulness and trust in God. What other ways have Evangelicals been blessed?