Seriously, where did you get this information?
Anyway, who really knows what Hell is like. The version of people burning in fire seems more like an old-fashioned version of Hell. I would actually think Hell is the absence of God and that people go there voluntarily if they actually reject God.
Old fashioned or not, this is the hell that was taught for 2000 years.
Where do I get my information ? From the Bible. Isn’t that what
Jesus said ? “The lake of fire” ? “Wailing and gnashing of theeth” ?!
From the
Church aproved Fatima revelations:
Our Lady showed us
a great sea of fire which seemed to be under the earth. Plunged in this fire were demons and souls in human form, like transparent burning embers, all blackened or burnished bronze, floating about in the conflagration, now raised into the air by the flames that issued from within themselves together with great clouds of smoke, now falling back on every side like sparks in a huge fire, without weight or equilibrium, and
amid shrieks and groans of pain and despair, which horrified us and made us tremble with fear. The demons could be distinguished by their terrifying and repulsive likeness to frightful and unknown animals, all black and transparent. This vision lasted but an instant. How can we ever be grateful enough to our kind heavenly Mother, who had already prepared us by promising, in the first Apparition, to take us to heaven. Otherwise, I think we would have died of fear and terror.
I have pondered the “God doesn’t send people to hell, they go there willingly because they reject God” argument long and hard and I came to the conclusion that it simply doesn’t hold water.
Nobody who is at least partially sane would ever “willingly” choose eternal torment and torture over eternal bliss.
This argument makes it sound as if the ones in hell are some kind of monsters, with nothing good in them, with no humanity, no soul, no nothing.
Regarding your (and my) father, the priests who told you he could go to Heaven were obviously good and decent people.
However, the official doctrine of the Church is that:
“Those who,
through no fault of their own, do not know the Gospel of Christ or his Church, but who nevertheless seek God with a sincere heart, and, moved by grace, try in their actions to do his will as they know it through the dictates of their conscience—those too may achieve eternal salvation.”
What does “no fault of their own” mean ? When there is a Catholic church at every corner, and you hear the word Jesus in every sentence, and you have internet and libraries and a Bible in every other bookshelf, can you still claim
invincible ignorance ?
Of course not.
Let’s take my father for example. He is not an atheist, he was
raised Catholic, even served as an altar boy when he was a child. He is an educated man. However, he simply does not believe everything the Church teaches, and is one of those “I can pray at home, God is not in a building” type of person. He does go to Mass on occasion, but not because he feels compeled.
Can he claim invincible ignorance regarding the teaching that missing Mass is a mortal sin that will send you to hell ? Of course not. He simply does not believe it. And, the official teaching of the Church is that he, among many others, is headed right for hell.
Despite the fact that he is a good man who tried to do good all his life and he believes in God and prays and sometimes goes to church, the official teaching is that
he rejects God and shall wilingly go to hell and eternal torment because he cannot bring himself to believe that going to Mass
every Sunday is necesary. Now how does that make sense ?