U
UnityofTrinity
Guest
Since the sermon often comes with the passages, what freedom do Catholic priests have to preach?
A good homilist can work those into many of the readings if he tried.then how do priests preach on things like sins, hell, rosary, abortion, gay marriages… because most often the passages don’t fit with these messages
Isn’t this one of the reasons why priests study so much theology? So that they understand the Bible and its passages, and are able to make them reflect modern day issues?then how do priests preach on things like sins, hell, rosary, abortion, gay marriages… because most often the passages don’t fit with these messages
Funny how we have this rich, three-year cycle of Sunday readings, and two-year cycle of weekday readings, but all the “hard” passages missed the cut. But it’s easy enough to make a link.then how do priests preach on things like sins, hell, rosary, abortion, gay marriages… because most often the passages don’t fit with these messages
Given some of the sermon’s I’ve heard, they probably have total freedom to say anything they want.
Very well put.Funny how we have this rich, three-year cycle of Sunday readings, and two-year cycle of weekday readings, but all the “hard” passages missed the cut. But it’s easy enough to make a link.
For example, Sunday 22 January 2012 will be the 39th anniversary of the US Supreme Court decision Roe v. Wade that legalized abortion.
The readings will be for the Third Sunday in Ordinary Time Year B: Jonah 3:1-5, 10; Psalm 25:4-5, 6-7, 8-9; 1 Corinthians 7:29-31; Mark 1:14-20.
- The first reading is about Jonah’s mission to confront Nineveh about its sins. Making a link to abortion in the USA is pretty easy.
- The Psalm is about God’s guidance of sinners to the right path. Again, easy.
- The second reading is about how we should act now that we are living in the end times. Again, easy.
- The gospel is about Jesus announcing that the time of repentance and the arrival of the Kingdom of God is near, and about the calls of Simon (Peter) and his brother Andrew, and James and his brother John, who all up and left their jobs immediately. Again, easy.
I don’t understand this comment. Not trying to challeng, just understand what you mean.Funny how we have this rich, three-year cycle of Sunday readings, and two-year cycle of weekday readings, but all the “hard” passages missed the cut.
You know, a few years ago my priest did his Christmas Eve homily about cooking his turkey, after he asked the congregation who was “at Mass only because someone made them come” and who “couldn’t wait to go home and dip into the sauce afterwards”.Given some of the sermon’s I’ve heard, they probably have total freedom to say anything they want.
Yes, and that is hinted at in the introductory material in the lectionary itself (cf. GIL 76-77). Some notable “hard” passages omitted are the whole of 1 Corinthians 14, the whole of Revelation 13, the story of Onan, and the Circumcision of the Philistines. Of course different passages are left out for different reasons including redundancy and overall “boringness” like much of 1-2 Chronicles and Leviticus.I don’t understand this comment. Not trying to challeng, just understand what you mean. Are you saying that certain passages are intentionally not placed in the lectionary cycle for some reason? What “Hard” passages missed the cut? Perhaps I am taking your comment the wrong way and I don’t mean to be uncharitable.-Tim-
Imagine the first reading being from 1 Samuel 15:Are you saying that certain passages are intentionally not placed in the lectionary cycle for some reason? What “Hard” passages missed the cut?
This is what the LORD of hosts has to say: ‘I will punish what Amalek did to Israel when he barred his way as he was coming up from Egypt.
Go, now, attack Amalek, and deal with him and all that he has under the ban. Do not spare him, but kill men and women, children and infants, oxen and sheep, camels and asses.’"
The Word of the Lord
Thanks be to God
Imagine the first reading being from 1 Samuel 15:
This is what the LORD of hosts has to say: ‘I will punish what Amalek did to Israel when he barred his way as he was coming up from Egypt.
Go, now, attack Amalek, and deal with him and all that he has under the ban. Do not spare him, but kill men and women, children and infants, oxen and sheep, camels and asses.’"
What’s wrong with that? I think it would have nice ring to it in Latin, no?The Word of the Lord
Thanks be to God
It would offend Amalekites.What’s wrong with that? I think it would have nice ring to it in Latin, no?
As a deacon I preached on serveral of these topics this past Sunday. They fit very well into the Gospel of the sower and the seed.then how do priests preach on things like sins, hell, rosary, abortion, gay marriages… because most often the passages don’t fit with these messages