Do protestants get the stigmata?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Aaron409
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I thought the Jewish gospels were the primary source of Gibson’s movie. 🙂
There are no “Jewish gospels”, in Judaism we do not have anything called that.

But as Lily said, the opening credits to the movie even say it was based on the alleged visions of Anna Catherina Emmerich.
 
WELL SAID! 👍 Furthermore, my awakening to Christ was THROUGH Padre Pio. This man was even able to read minds. He was attacked every day by the devil. Read the book if you further want to comment on this man chosen by God for his miracle. Did you know he also endured an operation without anesthesia? All documented by doctors and the like.
Hi Cath, yes you are right, or even St.Pio asked God to take his stigmata because he didn’t want it to get people attention. But God’s will said different thing, it appeared until St.Pio passed away then it disappeared and it happened with St. Francis of Asisi too.
I’m still reading Padre Pio the wonder worker. it’s a good book about him I think.And for St. Francis of asisi I just finished reading “Francis of Asisi” by Adrian House.
 
I don’t see a Protestant or non-Catholic case of stigmata in that link. Am I missing it?

Also, the reason why a stigmata may not appear in the identical spot as actuality is because it is not a duplicate representation. It is a sign, that God enacts on our terms. For example, when Padre Pio would get pains on certain feast days, it did not mean the feast’s occasion had to have happened on that exact day. However, because the pain came on the day Padre Pio understood as a feast day, the event took on meaning related to that feast day. The same way, the Stigmata having come via the hands and feet, which is how the event had historically been presented, thus brought with it mankind’s understanding that this is a participation in the suffering in the cross. But, I wouldn’t be surprised, because of our more modern forensic studies, if a stigmata appeared in the wrists in the coming centuries. On the other hand (no pun intended), if historical stigmatas are duplicates of the Crucifixion, then it would lend to the supposition of ropes being used in the Crucifixion like in The Passion.
 
I don’t see a Protestant or non-Catholic case of stigmata in that link. Am I missing it?

Also, the reason why a stigmata may not appear in the identical spot as actuality is because it is not a duplicate representation. It is a sign, that God enacts on our terms. For example, when Padre Pio would get pains on certain feast days, it did not mean the feast’s occasion had to have happened on that exact day. However, because the pain came on the day Padre Pio understood as a feast day, the event took on meaning related to that feast day. The same way, the Stigmata having come via the hands and feet, which is how the event had historically been presented, thus brought with it mankind’s understanding that this is a participation in the suffering in the cross. But, I wouldn’t be surprised, because of our more modern forensic studies, if a stigmata appeared in the wrists in the coming centuries. On the other hand (no pun intended), if historical stigmatas are duplicates of the Crucifixion, then it would lend to the supposition of ropes being used in the Crucifixion like in The Passion.
That’s the point… (there may be if keep looking, but I doubt it)
 
evolution of blood types, ah the blood type is wrong
lisashea.com/lisabase/biology/art14442.html
The twentieth-century record of stigmata, however, “shows a change in pattern.” Italy dominated somewhat less, and cases were reported from Great Britain, Australia, and the United States (Harrison 1994, 9). The latter included (in 1972) a ten-year-old African-American girl named Cloretta Robinson, a Baptist and thus one of a very few non-Catholic Christians to have exhibited the stigmata (including at least three Anglicans; Harrison 1994, 9, 87).
findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2843/is_4_24/ai_63693003/print

Also, the Shape of the wounds are all wrong too. Roman Nails were Square, not round. Big Smile
 
I hear that there were Muslims who have had stigmata of the wounds of Muhammad in battle. Does anyone know whom those Muslims were by name and date?
 
The wounds of Muhammad were on his back.

And the phenomenon is not exclusively a Christian one. Cases are also known of Muslim stigmatics who bear wounds that correspond to those known to have been suffered by Muhammed (c. 570 C.E.–632 C.E.) while doing battle.

unexplainedstuff.com/Religious-Phenomena/Stigmata.html

google.com/search?hl=en&q=wounds+Muhammad+Muslim+stigmata

google.com/search?hl=en&q=+Muslim+stigmata+Muhammad+wounds+back±Jesus

see number 9 near botom
oopi.us/musikfestpix.html

But, in looking into the Muslim one’s I can’t find any names or dates which makes me wounder if those are simply rummor.
 
The stigmata are of hysterical origin. They tend to occur in individuals, usually women, who are intensely religious, often in isolated, old world situations.
Ahh I get it, a highly intelligent man and mystic is suffering from hysteria? 😛
The stigmata appear on the hands, though recent historical scholarship has shown that victims were usually crucified through the wrists as the hands would tear through the nails. I don’t know if there have been any stigmatics with wrist wound identified yet. Aside from those of Padre Pio, stigmata occur much less frequently now than in the past .
Please cite your evidence?

Infact there is a lot of evidence that the nail was driven through the hand using the big muscle below the thumb which is capable of supporting the weight of a man.
There is a very interesting documentary by Arthur C. Clarke from the 1970’s
Whose work was arguably largely speculative rather than analytical
. She was a member of a Black Protestant evangelical congregation. The young lady did not feel that she needed stigmata to show her Christian faith, and sought psychiatric treatment with hypnosis to rid herself of them. She succeeded in doing so.
Padre Peo did not need stigmata to show his authentic Christian faith.

Good for her. So she managed to ‘get cured’ of a Chrism. :rolleyes:
The Italian Capuchins in Padre Pio’s order, however, got rich through the notoriety of his stigmata, and built a big basilica off the donations. Quite a different attitude
Again please show your evidence that individual Capuchins ‘got rich’?

The fact the Capuchin Order showed respect and reverence for a former member is not so unusual. Why should they not do so, particularly when that former member was a mystic?

I have a picture of Pardre Pio in my hall. It shows his great love, awe and devotion to the Blessed Sacrament. 👍
Padre Pio pray for us.

Blessings and peace.
 
WAS PADRE PIO LEGITIMATE?
Not recently, but awhile ago, I read up on Padre Pio. I have to say, in all honesty, that what I read left me with the impression that he was a mental case. I hesitate to say this because he may well have been sincere, a man truly devoted to Christ. But he said and heard such wierd things that I had to dismiss him as a serious person to either emulate or venerate.
 
WAS PADRE PIO LEGITIMATE?
Code:
 Not recently, but awhile ago, I read up on Padre Pio. I have to say, in all honesty, that what I read left me with the impression that he was a mental case. I hesitate to say this because he may well have been sincere, a man truly devoted to Christ. But he said and heard such wierd things that I had to dismiss him as a serious person to either emulate or venerate.
Such as? Please inform us of these weird things.

He is a canonized Saint. But I’m not sure that means much to you as one who does not recognize the authority of the Catholic Church.

Most of the Saints throughout the ages were eccentric. I think that’s fair to say.

Yes, Padre Pio was legitimate. Yes, he is good to emulate, because he was a man truly after the heart of Christ, our Lord.
 
CHRISTCNECTION1 - RE PADRE PIO
Code:
Sorry, but I don't have all the evidence at hand. I do recall checking into Padre Pio at some length and becoming convinced that he had a major mental aberration. I can't go back and regurgitate the evidence I researched back then - and I've since forgotten much of it.  It was more than the stigmata matter. Quotations of his, for example, convinced me that he was either a mental case or a fraud. And I prefer to think the former.

  As I recall, the Church regarded him very suspiciously before John Paul II, but JPII was much into saints - canonized hundreds -and was especially vulnerable to medieval-like miracles. 

   I realize that you probably believe that 'good Catholics' are supposed to accept anything the Church officially says or does, but God gave me a brain and I'm not going insult my Creator by turning it over to any other person or organization, including the Church. I believe in the 'big tent' where the faithful can remain devoted to Christ and his message without swallowing everything some Pope or Council proclaims. This attempt to force blind conformity within the Church helps explain why 30,000,000 Americans are ex-Catholics. If it hadn't been for the massive Latino immigration, much of it illegal, we'd have lost half of our US flock.
 
CHRISTCNECTION1 - RE PADRE PIO
Code:
Sorry, but I don't have all the evidence at hand. I do recall checking into Padre Pio at some length and becoming convinced that he had a major mental aberration. I can't go back and regurgitate the evidence I researched back then - and I've since forgotten much of it.  It was more than the stigmata matter. Quotations of his, for example, convinced me that he was either a mental case or a fraud. And I prefer to think the former.

  As I recall, the Church regarded him very suspiciously before John Paul II, but JPII was much into saints - canonized hundreds -and was especially vulnerable to medieval-like miracles. 

   I realize that you probably believe that 'good Catholics' are supposed to accept anything the Church officially says or does, but God gave me a brain and I'm not going insult my Creator by turning it over to any other person or organization, including the Church. I believe in the 'big tent' where the faithful can remain devoted to Christ and his message without swallowing everything some Pope or Council proclaims. This attempt to force blind conformity within the Church helps explain why 30,000,000 Americans are ex-Catholics. If it hadn't been for the massive Latino immigration, much of it illegal, we'd have lost half of our US flock.
God bless you too Roy.

Perhaps opening a thread that pertains to your viewpoint would be appropriate. My sense in that it doesn’t belong in this topic, particularly your last paragraph.

Please inform us if you do come across the relevant information on Padre Pio.

All the best in your walk with the Lord…
 
** I realize that you probably believe that ‘good Catholics’ are supposed to accept anything the Church officially says or does, but God gave me a brain and I’m not going insult my Creator by turning it over to any other person or organization, including the Church. I believe in the ‘big tent’ where the faithful can remain devoted to Christ and his message without swallowing everything some Pope or Council proclaims. This attempt to force blind conformity within the Church helps explain why 30,000,000 Americans are ex-Catholics. If it hadn’t been for the massive Latino immigration, much of it illegal, we’d have lost half of our US flock.**

I think you are already off the topic.
And have you read the miracle happened through Padre Pio??
 
CHRISTCNECTION1 - RE PADRE PIO
Code:
Sorry, but I don't have all the evidence at hand. I do recall checking into Padre Pio at some length and becoming convinced that he had a major mental aberration. I can't go back and regurgitate the evidence I researched back then - and I've since forgotten much of it.  It was more than the stigmata matter. Quotations of his, for example, convinced me that he was either a mental case or a fraud. And I prefer to think the former.

  As I recall, the Church regarded him very suspiciously before John Paul II, but JPII was much into saints - canonized hundreds -and was especially vulnerable to medieval-like miracles. 

   I realize that you probably believe that 'good Catholics' are supposed to accept anything the Church officially says or does, but God gave me a brain and I'm not going insult my Creator by turning it over to any other person or organization, including the Church. I believe in the 'big tent' where the faithful can remain devoted to Christ and his message without swallowing everything some Pope or Council proclaims. This attempt to force blind conformity within the Church helps explain why 30,000,000 Americans are ex-Catholics. If it hadn't been for the massive Latino immigration, much of it illegal, we'd have lost half of our US flock.
Firstly - this evidence was so convincing and so disturbing that you don’t remember what it actually was? Seems to me that someone who expects to be taken seriously doesn’t speak without having to hand the facts/quotes/evidence to back up what they’re saying.

As for JP2’s canonisations - you DO realise that the ‘large numbers’ are solely due to his canonising huge groups of people who were martyrs for the Catholic faith. And even with his allegedly huge number of canonisations there’s still about 10,000 saints - which is an average of a whopping FIVE people canonised every year. Shows how eager the Church is to proclaim new saints - not.

And what’s wrong with JP2 recognising those who went to China, Africa, Korea, and other places and gave their lives for the Catholic faith? Do you doubt for an instant that these people who died for their faith in Christ have been received into heaven?

Secondly - medieval like miracles? Which ones would they be? What is it about them that makes them ‘medieval’ as opposed to modern-day miracles?

You do know that it’s not even the Pope who is the one who examines the miracles that are put forward in regard to candidates for canonisation or reaches conclusions about whether they actually happened or not? And that EVERY candidate for sainthood has an official called a ‘Promoter of the Faith’ appointed to their case - whose sole task is to poke holes in every single alleged miracle and every bit of information put forward about single alleged candidate for Sainthood. Their job is to try to prove that the person should NOT be a Saint or that the miracle was NOT really a miracle.

All alleged miracles are in fact thoroughly scientifically examined - usually by non-Catholics and even non-Christians who have the SCIENTIFIC expertise necessary to do so, since of course the Pope and clergy don’t - and of course these scientists aren’t Church officials with a vested interest in the matter.

Thirdly - God did indeed give us brains. I’ve used mine very well - I certainly don’t switch it off when I walk through the Church door. And so have all of the former non-Catholics on this board. On their behalf I’m utterly offended by any implication that they haven’t.

We, after thorougly examining scriptures, the writings of early Christians and the history of the Catholic and other Christian Churches, have logically determined that Christ speaks today with ONE authentic, truthful and consistent voice, as He did while on earth in the flesh. Since His Ascension that voice has been that of the Catholic Church.

And that He cannot possibly be speaking through the multiple, confused voices of your ‘big tent’, who cannot even agree on the basics such as whether Christ really existed, was both really human and really God, or really rose from the dead, let alone hold unified or consistent positions on any other topic. Our Creator is not the author of this sort of confusion. That much is logically deducible, surely.
 
WAS PADRE PIO LEGITIMATE?
Code:
 Not recently, but awhile ago, I read up on Padre Pio. I have to say, in all honesty, that what I read left me with the impression that he was a mental case. I hesitate to say this because he may well have been sincere, a man truly devoted to Christ. But he said and heard such wierd things that I had to dismiss him as a serious person to either emulate or venerate.
On October 22, 1918, Padre Pio wrote to his spiritual advisor, Padre Benedetto, describing how he received the stigmata. "On the morning of the 20th of last month, in the choir, after I had celebrated Mass, I yielded to a drowsiness similar to a sweet sleep. All the internal and external senses and even the very faculties of my soul were immersed in indescribable stillness. Absolute silence surrounded and invaded me. I was suddenly filled with great peace and abandonment which effaced everything else and caused a lull in the turmoil.
" (Padre Pio, Letters 1, No. 511).

My emphasis

Hardly sounds like hysteria. In fact it sounds more to me like the very opposite.

His experience was clearly cool, calm collect and still.

So how does this match your definition of hysteria ? 😛

Blessings and peace
 
On October 22, 1918, Padre Pio wrote to his spiritual advisor, Padre Benedetto, describing how he received the stigmata. "On the morning of the 20th of last month, in the choir, after I had celebrated Mass, I yielded to a drowsiness similar to a sweet sleep. All the internal and external senses and even the very faculties of my soul were immersed in indescribable stillness. Absolute silence surrounded and invaded me. I was suddenly filled with great peace and abandonment which effaced everything else and caused a lull in the turmoil.
" (Letters 1, No. 511).

My emphasis

Hardly sounds like hysteria. In fact it sounds more to me like the very opposite.

His experience was clearly cool, calm collect and still.

So how does this match your definition of hysteria ? 😛

Blessings and peace
Not to mention that immediately after his death the stigmata were observed to have disappeared. How to explain that?
 
Not to mention that immediately after his death the stigmata were observed to have disappeared. How to explain that?
I don’t know LilyM; it sounds a little too medieval to me. 🙂
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top