Obedience in little things leads to obedience in big things.
I think I would assert that there is a greater “cogent point” in play: the GIRM is the current expression of the Church with respect to the Mass. If you feel that a Catholic is above this expression, by virtue of their personal point of view, then that presents a particular hermeneutic that is rather interesting…
this assumes a right reading of the GIRM.
Interesting. There’s a ‘better’ “right reading” that you have in mind?
But the GIRM may be changed.
Perhaps. However, by this logic, Friday abstinence should be eschewed – after all, as a discipline, it “may be changed”…
If it is read correctly in this thread, it should be changed.
Wow. Just… wow. We judge the validity of Church statements by their reception among the faithful? Really?
It should also be noted that the GIRM on at least three occasions mentions that the choir alone should sing
OK… so there are places in the liturgy at which the choir alone should sing. What does this have to do with the general notion that the faithful should sing? Umm… nothing! After all, there are more than “three occasions” where the GIRM mentions that the priest celebrant should pray – does this imply that the faithful shouldn’t pray? Of course not!
the cited prooftext in favor of the requirement to sing
OK … I have to admit; this statement is really what prompted me to reply. I’m assuming that you’re referencing the quote I provided from the GIRM, way back at the beginning of this thread. “Prooftext”? Really? I haven’t been following all the twists and turns of this thread as they developed, but… “prooftext”? C’mon … if you want to assert prooftext, you’re going to have to explain why the quotation isn’t applicable, especially since it appears in the chapter entitled “Duties And Ministries In The Mass” and the section within it entitled “The Functions of the People of God”. Prooftext? Hardly…