Do we know the last name of Jesus and Mary?

  • Thread starter Thread starter WilT
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
It seems that all posters are correct. Lately, in the Scriptures I have read the first name along with who their parents were or the city they were from. In Catholicism we do the same I’ve noticed. St. Catherine of Sienna, St. Theresa of Avila, and then there is what they adored as in St. John of the Cross. It still seems to me a little odd on how they didn’t have a true last name as in Smith or as in Jones.
 
also too names were significant as when God changed Abram name to Abraham and Barabbas which means something like the Son of God.
Today names mean nothing. Parents are giving their children ungodly names as in Pepsi, Carrie Oakey (karaoke), Justin Case, Denim, Porche, Blanket, Alabama and so on…

How times have negatively changed.
 
also too names were significant as when God changed Abram name to Abraham and Barabbas which means something like the Son of God.
Barabbas means ‘son of Abba’. There’s a theological significance right there since Abba could also mean ‘father’ - plus points since in some manuscripts of Matthew’s gospel Barabbas’ name is given as Jesus. So what you have is, Pilate presenting the people two Jesuses. (There’s another line of interpretation which says that Barabbas is actually a nickname bar-Rabban ‘son of the teacher’.)
Today names mean nothing. Parents are giving their children ungodly names as in Pepsi, Carrie Oakey (karaoke), Justin Case, Denim, Porche, Blanket, Alabama and so on…
How times have negatively changed.
It’s not like it’s anything new - you had a guy named Dancell-Dallphebo-Mark-Anthony-Gallery-Cesar living in the 16th century. But on the other hand, you did have 16th-17th century Puritans naming their children things like Praise-God, If-Christ-had-not-died-for-thee-thou-hadst-been-damned, Jesus-Christ-came-into-the-world- to-save or even Humiliation or Forsaken or Sorry-for-sin or Die-Well. So it goes both ways I guess. 🤷
 
Actually I think it would be:

Jesus (Yeshua) ben (son of) Joseph

and

Mary (Miriam) ** bat **(daughter of) Joachim
In Hebrew the word for ‘son (of)’ is ben; the Aramaic equivalent is bar (yes, bar mitzvah is an Aramaic term). So Yeshua bar-Yosef and Yeshua ben-Yosef are both correct. (‘Daughter (of)’ is bat in both Aramaic and Hebrew.)
He could have been called “Jesus Nazarene” in the same way that one of the Mary’s in the Bible is called Mary Magdalene, based on her town of origin plus the suffix “-ene” to indicate “from” (I think).
You have one instance in all four gospels where Jesus gets identified by His (earthly) father and place of origin. “Philip found Nathanael and said to him, ‘We have found him of whom Moses in the Law and also the prophets wrote, Jesus of Nazareth, the son of Joseph.’” (John 1:45)
It seems that all posters are correct. Lately, in the Scriptures I have read the first name along with who their parents were or the city they were from. In Catholicism we do the same I’ve noticed. St. Catherine of Sienna, St. Theresa of Avila, and then there is what they adored as in St. John of the Cross. It still seems to me a little odd on how they didn’t have a true last name as in Smith or as in Jones.
The latter two saints had last names of some sort, BTW: Teresa Sánchez de Cepeda y Ahumada (Teresa of Avila); Juan de Yepes y Álvarez (John of the Cross). Both their parents’ surnames - the father’s first, followed by the mother’s maiden name - are indicated as per Spanish naming customs.
 
The latter two saints had last names of some sort, BTW: Teresa Sánchez de Cepeda y Ahumada (Teresa of Avila); Juan de Yepes y Álvarez (John of the Cross). Both their parents’ surnames - the father’s first, followed by the mother’s maiden name - are indicated as per Spanish naming customs.
👍
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top