J
jerry74383
Guest
Moral sins? Isn’t that an oxymoron?Sackcloth and ashes? For moral sins?
Moral sins? Isn’t that an oxymoron?Sackcloth and ashes? For moral sins?
Oops I meant mortal sinsBack on altar girls, I remember at my parish when they were first introduced, the boys went out the door (of their own will) almost immediately. To this day there are more altar girls than boys, but even with both, that particular church struggles to have enough servers for all the Masses. This is a problem that never happened before serving became a girl’s thing.
If suspect that if we made more use of sackcloth and ashes there’d be fewer mortal sins…Oops I meant mortal sins.
Darndid autocorrect .
There are plenty of ways to sacrifice and do penance in this world without sackcloth and ashes… In fact, seeing as sackcloth and ashes would stick out like a sore thumb and others could be done more privately it seems better to stick with the other penances. After all, we are not meant to show off our sacrifices to the world, but rather ‘fast in secret’ so that our reward will come in heaven rather than on earth.If suspect that if we made more use of sackcloth and ashes there’d be fewer mortal sins…
Generally, I agree but recently I’ve learned more about Lent and how its a time of public penance, so the traditional Lenten fasts were done openly and in Catholic societies were shared by all. Only penances we do outside the normal or at the advice of our spiritual director are private. In the same way, the use of sackcloth and ashes in ancient times was a public penance sometimes done by a whole city (Ninevah, etc).There are plenty of ways to sacrifice and do penance in this world without sackcloth and ashes… In fact, seeing as sackcloth and ashes would stick out like a sore thumb and others could be done more privately it seems better to stick with the other penances. After all, we are not meant to show off our sacrifices to the world, but rather ‘fast in secret’ so that our reward will come in heaven rather than on earth.
For the sake of continuity if nothing else.To OP:
Yes we need those traditions.
Haven't we been trying to do this for the last 50 years?To OP:
Yes we need those traditions. Anything else is a safe road to disaster.
I pray daily for the souls in purgatory and defend the churchHaven't we been trying to do this for the last 50 years?
I’ve noticed that by reading books like 1962 Roman Missal, Blessed Be God and a copy of Lauds, Vespers and Compline in English that if we haven’t thrown out older traditions they’ve been obfuscated enough to cause confusion.
One example, there are many, how many folks pray the daily prayers for the souls in purgatory? Why has this devotion/tradition/prayer been tossed into the dust bin of history? I know that if I’m fortunate enough to make it to purgatory I certainly hope those in the church militant will be praying for me.
I think tossing out our older traditions is a huge mistake.
</opinion alert>
s old traditions on a daily basis in super-secular Norway when people look at you as completely insane if you are not doing things outside of Gods holy marriage, being “hot”, trendy-cool and “in time”.I cant agree more! I wear nice dresses and skirts to mass but I always feel like I am too dressed up.EXACTLY! I couldn’t agree more.
What happens when the mass (the most perfect form of prayer) looks, sounds, smells, and just all around feels quite ordinary?? Basically, our Catholicism becomes the “thing” we do for one hour on Sunday. Or, perhaps, we can “get it in” on SATURDAY and “get it over with” so we can “sleep in” on Sunday. UGGH!
There is nothing different in our NO parish happening at mass. Because everything is so “ordinary” they come to the altar in jeans and house slippers, shorts and sandals and t-shirts, mini skirts and tank tops…you know…ORDINARY. NO DIFFERENT than the other 167 hours of the week.
When this is how we present ourselves to the King of Kings, any wonder why only 30% of Catholics believe in the true presence? Because there is nothing SPECIAL happening at the NO masses.
Imagine yourself meeting Jesus somewhere face-to-face. Do you “high-5” him? Shake his hand? or drop to your knees and wash His feet with your tears and dry them with your hair? I can’t be thankful enough for all He has done for me. I opt for the feet.
Ecumenism is against Revelation !!!That depends on what you mean by ecumenism.2 Thessalonians 2:15 So then, brothers, stand firm and hold to the teachings we passed on to you, whether by word of mouth or by letter. enough said about Tradition !
2 Thes. 3:6 “We charge you, brethren, in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that you withdraw yourselves from every brother walking disorderly, and not according to the tradition which they have received from us.”
Second Epistle of St. John : ‘If any man come to you and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into the house nor say to him: God speed you. For he that saith unto him: God speed you, communicateth with his wicked works’ (1:10-11).
Code:Ecumenism is against Revelation !!!
If you mean something in the documents themselves you should provide a quote so that everyone who reads this can evaluate whether or not it is actually a false ecumenism. If you are talking about certain things that people did ‘in the spirit of vatican II’ it would probably be helpful to make that distinction clearThe ecumenism I was referring to is the false ecumenism of Vatican II that teaches that non-Catholics don’t need to return to the Catholic Church for unity and salvation.
Pope Pius XI, Mortalium Animos (#10), Jan. 6, 1928:
“… the union of Christians can only be promoted by promoting the return to the one true Church of Christ of those who are separated from it…”
There’s plenty that’s inconsistent but that’s good, because in many ways we Catholics have gotten too lazy and spoiled. Everything’s a little tougher and a little stricter at the Latin Mass. The old rules on fasting, the longer liturgy and the homilies are tougher, too. The priests don’t avoid or gloss over the unpopular aspects of Catholicism. You’re expected to dress a little nicer and more modestly. The children have to learn their catechism.A curious question. For those of you who have adopted the traditional church (i.e. EO format, etc.), are there any traditions that you see as inconsistent with our society today?
I say that partly out of another thread that I am involved with about alter girls…there has been a long time tradition of boys only and I think that is one tradition we can scrap…anyways, what part of the church in 1948 can we scrap in the interests of the church making sense in 2012?
Bruce
There is more than one way to take that quote…I’m rather of the opinion that we ought to interpret it in light of the church’s past teachings. What exactly does this quote mean by ‘significance and importance’? These words could be taken to mean that people can be saved through other religions … Or they could be talking about, say the role of Judaism in the coming of Christ, the fact that becoming a Christian can often be the first step to becoming Catholic. The same kind of reasoning applies with the idea that they can be a ‘means’. There are different sorts of means, again, if a Protestants belief in Christ and the Bible leads him to stuy the early fathers and become Catholic, then yes, a Protestant religion was a means to becoming Catholic. I don’t know, it just seems like since it can be understood as not being heretical, it makes more sense for me to assume that it’s not.Vatican II document, Unitatis redintegratio (# 3):
“It follows that these separated churches and communities as such, though we believe them to be deficient in some respects, have by no means been deprived of significance and importance in the mystery of salvation. For the Spirit of Christ has not refrained from using them as means of salvation whose efficacy comes from that fullness of grace and truth which has been entrusted to the Catholic Church.”
This is one of Vatican II’s worst heresies. It constitutes a rejection of the dogma Outside the Catholic Church There is No Salvation.
It seems to me that all religions are esteemed by todays Church except those Traditional Catholics who had been excommunicated for standing fast in Catholic Tradition
I am not really sure if there is more to this than what is here. Like what context it is taken in, I have studied too much of VII, but I do feel, IMHO, that we have come to the place where we accept the “I’m okay, you’re okay” theology and no longer work to bring protestants home to the true faith and it makes me wonder how many souls will be lost with that thinking.Vatican II document, Unitatis redintegratio (# 3):
“It follows that these separated churches and communities as such, though we believe them to be deficient in some respects, have by no means been deprived of significance and importance in the mystery of salvation. For the Spirit of Christ has not refrained from using them as means of salvation whose efficacy comes from that fullness of grace and truth which has been entrusted to the Catholic Church.”
This is one of Vatican II’s worst heresies. It constitutes a rejection of the dogma Outside the Catholic Church There is No Salvation.
It seems to me that all religions are esteemed by todays Church except those Traditional Catholics who had been excommunicated for standing fast in Catholic Tradition