A
anon64704623
Guest
I don’t understand what you mean.
You stated if the amount that the public donates is insufficent than the insitution should just eat the costs.I don’t understand what you mean.
I think you misunderstand. For example, in my country, there is no religious institute at all. My church will have to send me to another country to study for my priesthood. If my church does not have enough money to cover the costs, the foreign institute will be chasing after me and my church.You stated if the amount that the public donates is insufficent than the insitution should just eat the costs.
I have a strange feeling this will happen. Lol!but I’d be willing to bet they’re darn good fundraisers.
Chasing after you?Xanthippe_Voorhees:![]()
I think you misunderstand. For example, in my country, there is no religious institute at all. My church will have to send me to another country to study for my priesthood. If my church does not have enough money to cover the costs, the foreign institute will be chasing after me and my church.You stated if the amount that the public donates is insufficent than the insitution should just eat the costs.
No, why?Are you angry?
This I agree but it feels wrong. That’s all.i agree seminary education should be free
is that financially possible? … most likely not
Education has costs. They have to be paid somehow.Do you think it is morally wrong to charge money for seminary education?
Why would you think there would be a difference? Education costs, no matter what the field.Architecture, civil engineering, medical doctors, I could understand but a seminary education?
The way to heaven is found by grace, through faith. Jesus paid the price of our salvation on the cross. This has no relation to whatever vocation to which a person is called. Would you equally say that the expenses related to marriage and raising children are “buying our way to heaven”? I don’t understand.but a seminary education? It’s like we are trying to “buy” our way to heaven.
While this is true, living in this world has expenses.if the teacher is truly great he should feel the urge to spread the good news without expecting to be paid.
There is plenty of knowledge available “free” on the internet, and in books available to everyone. I have learned more about my faith since joining CAF than I have in decades of being a “baptized Catholic”. There are resources available to anyone who wants to study their faith.Seminarians should receive God’s knowledge freely otherwise it becomes a pay-or-thou-shall-not-be-holy scheme.
You still haven’t answered.I never said I wanted to become a priest. I am just asking should an institute that teach religion be charging money instead of charity. For example, a Buddhist monastery do no charge those who want to ordain as a monk.
I think you lost me here. What doe any of these expenses have to do with becoming holy? All of us are called to be holy, regardless of one’s state in life. A person who is desiring to become a priest and is at a public university studying philosophy still has expenses.Seminarians should receive God’s knowledge freely otherwise it becomes a pay-or-thou-shall-not-be-holy scheme.
It appears that you have a very primitive view of the educational system.Seminarians should not be forced to pay like some sort of business transaction, they should be urged to donate to the teacher.
And what are you, personally, doing about your beliefs?I think religious education should not be something for you to “buy”.
No, but what is meant by “pick up the cost”? Those of us in the diocese pay for the support of the seminarians. It is not “free”. Just because the student does not get stuck with the bill does not mean someone does not pay.I was under the impression that as long as you study at your diocese’s seminary they pick up the cost. Seminarians might have some small living expenses, but no tuition. Am I wrong?
How does this happen?I was under the impression that bishops similarly covered the costs for their seminarians.
No seminarian is “forced to pay” anything. If they are not personally able to shoulder the expense of their education, there are options. You seem to believe that education does not cost anything. I have yet to read a post of yours that suggests another alternative (rather than making the student responsible).I agree, but as an institute of RELIGIOUS learning they should not force seminarians to pay fixed amount of $$$. Instead they should ask for donations to support themselves. It feels wrong.
It is not the duty of the priest to “spread the word of God”. That duty belongs to the laity. The duty of the priest is to support the laity to do the work of the ministry.Get more people to spread the word of God.
It is not about “refusing” to teach. It is about having one’s bills to pay. How are educators to pay their own living expenses? Honestly, you seem to have your head somewhere that the sun does not shine!So, if they are not paid their salary, then they refused to teach?