Do you believe in a hierarchy of sins?

[SSTeacher]

Are some sins more serious than others? If you believe that some sins are indeed more serious than others how do you personally assess which ones are more serious? Why are there only “Seven Deadly Sins”? If you were asked to compile an addendum to that list titled, 1001 Sins That Aren’t Quite So Serious what sins would you list and why would you include them?

Curiously,
Mick

 

[Jesus_123]

:coffeeread: From The Catechism of the Catholic Church . . . *hope this helps answer your question . . . a link to the full text on line is at the bottom of the thread . . . *

**ARTICLE 8 - SIN

III. The Different Kinds of Sins …**

**1853 **
Sins can be distinguished according to their objects, as can every human act; or according to the virtues they oppose, by excess or defect; or according to the commandments they violate. They can also be classed according to whether they concern God, neighbor, or oneself; they can be divided into spiritual and carnal sins, or again as sins in thought, word, deed, or omission. The root of sin is in the heart of man, in his free will, according to the teaching of the Lord: "For out of the heart come evil thoughts, murder, adultery, fornication, theft, false witness, slander. These are what defile a man."128 But in the heart also resides charity, the source of the good and pure works, which sin wounds.

IV. The Gravity of Sin: Mortal and Venial Sin

1854
Sins are rightly evaluated according to their gravity. The distinction between mortal and venial sin, already evident in Scripture,129 became part of the tradition of the Church. It is corroborated by human experience.

**1855 **
Mortal sin destroys charity in the heart of man by a grave violation of God’s law; it turns man away from God, who is his ultimate end and his beatitude, by preferring an inferior good to him.
Venial sin allows charity to subsist, even though it offends and wounds it.

**1856 **
Mortal sin, by attacking the vital principle within us—that is, charity—necessitates a new initiative of God’s mercy and a conversion of heart which is normally accomplished within the setting of the sacrament of reconciliation:

When the will sets itself upon something that is of its nature incompatible with the charity that orients man toward his ultimate end, then the sin is mortal by its very object . . . whether it contradicts the love of God, such as blasphemy or perjury, or the love of neighbor, such as homicide or adultery. . . . But when the sinner’s will is set upon something that of its nature involves a disorder, but is not opposed to the love of God and neighbor, such as thoughtless chatter or immoderate laughter and the like, such sins are venial.130

1857
For a sin to be mortal, three conditions must together be met: "Mortal sin is sin whose object is grave matter and which is also committed with full knowledge and deliberate consent."131

**1858 **
Grave matter is specified by the Ten Commandments, corresponding to the answer of Jesus to the rich young man: "Do not kill, Do not commit adultery, Do not steal, Do not bear false witness, Do not defraud, Honor your father and your mother."132 The gravity of sins is more or less great: murder is graver than theft. One must also take into account who is wronged: violence against parents is in itself graver than violence against a stranger.

**1859 **
Mortal sin requires full knowledge and complete consent. It presupposes knowledge of the sinful character of the act, of its opposition to God’s law. It also implies a consent sufficiently deliberate to be a personal choice. Feigned ignorance and hardness of heart133 do not diminish, but rather increase, the voluntary character of a sin.

1860
Unintentional ignorance can diminish or even remove the imputability of a grave offense. But no one is deemed to be ignorant of the principles of the moral law, which are written in the conscience of every man. The promptings of feelings and passions can also diminish the voluntary and free character of the offense, as can external pressures or pathological disorders. Sin committed through malice, by deliberate choice of evil, is the gravest.

**1861 **
Mortal sin is a radical possibility of human freedom, as is love itself. It results in the loss of charity and the privation of sanctifying grace, that is, of the state of grace. If it is not redeemed by repentance and God’s forgiveness, it causes exclusion from Christ’s kingdom and the eternal death of hell, for our freedom has the power to make choices for ever, with no turning back. However, although we can judge that an act is in itself a grave offense, we must entrust judgment of persons to the justice and mercy of God.

**1862 **
One commits venial sin when, in a less serious matter, he does not observe the standard prescribed by the moral law, or when he disobeys the moral law in a grave matter, but without full knowledge or without complete consent.

**1863 **
Venial sin weakens charity; it manifests a disordered affection for created goods; it impedes the soul’s progress in the exercise of the virtues and the practice of the moral good; it merits temporal punishment. Deliberate and unrepented venial sin disposes us little by little to commit mortal sin. However venial sin does not break the covenant with God. With God’s grace it is humanly reparable. "Venial sin does not deprive the sinner of sanctifying grace, friendship with God, charity, and consequently eternal happiness."134

While he is in the flesh, man cannot help but have at least some light sins. But do not despise these sins which we call “light”: if you take them for light when you weigh them, tremble when you count them. A number of light objects makes a great mass; a number of drops fills a river; a number of grains makes a heap. What then is our hope? Above all, confession. . . .135

Link: forums.catholic-questions.org/newreply.php?do=postreply&t=359007

. . . all for Jesus+
. . . thank you Blessed Holy Mother Church+​

 

[SSTeacher]

:coffeeread: From The Catechism of the Catholic Church . . . *hope this helps answer your question . . . a link to the full text on line is at the bottom of the thread . . . *Link: forums.catholic-questions.org/newreply.php?do=postreply&t=359007

. . . all for Jesus+
. . . thank you Blessed Holy Mother Church+​

Thanks for your contribution. So if you were asked to compile a list of sins titled, 1001 Sins That Aren’t Quite So Serious what sins would you list and why would you include them?

Ecumenically,
Mick

 

[Jesus_123]

:coffeeread: **Oops! . . . **wrong link for the Catechism . . . here’s the right one . . . below is more from The Catechism of the Catholic Church . . . a *“list” ? . . . too morbid . . . not my “cup of tea” . . . *

Link: htttp://www.usccb.org/catechism/text/pt3sect1chpt1art8.shtml

I. Mercy and Sin

1846
The Gospel is the revelation in Jesus Christ of God’s mercy to sinners. The angel announced to Joseph: "You shall call his name Jesus, for he will save his people from their sins."The same is true of the Eucharist, the sacrament of redemption: “This is my blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins.”

**1848 **
As St. Paul affirms, “Where sin increased, grace abounded all the more.” But to do its work grace must uncover sin so as to convert our hearts and bestow on us “righteousness to eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.” Like a physician who probes the wound before treating it, God, by his Word and by his Spirit, casts a living light on sin:

Conversion requires convincing of sin; it includes the interior judgment of conscience, and this, being a proof of the action of the Spirit of truth in man’s inmost being, becomes at the same time the start of a new grant of grace and love: “Receive the Holy Spirit.” Thus in this “convincing concerning sin” we discover a double gift: the gift of the truth of conscience and the gift of the certainty of redemption. The Spirit of truth is the Consoler.

II. The Definition of Sin

**1849 **
Sin is an offense against reason, truth, and right conscience; it is failure in genuine love for God and neighbor caused by a perverse attachment to certain goods. It wounds the nature of man and injures human solidarity. It has been defined as “an utterance, a deed, or a desire contrary to the eternal law.”

1850
Sin is an offense against God: “Against you, you alone, have I sinned, and done that which is evil in your sight.” Sin sets itself against God’s love for us and turns our hearts away from it. Like the first sin, it is disobedience, a revolt against God through the will to become “like gods,” knowing and determining good and evil. Sin is thus “love of oneself even to contempt of God.” In this proud self-exaltation, sin is diametrically opposed to the obedience of Jesus, which achieves our salvation.

**1851 **
It is precisely in the Passion, when the mercy of Christ is about to vanquish it, that sin most clearly manifests its violence and its many forms: unbelief, murderous hatred, shunning and mockery by the leaders and the people, Pilate’s cowardice and the cruelty of the soldiers, Judas’ betrayal—so bitter to Jesus, Peter’s denial and the disciples’ flight. However, at the very hour of darkness, the hour of the prince of this world, the sacrifice of Christ secretly becomes the source from which the forgiveness of our sins will pour forth inexhaustibly.

III. The Different Kinds of Sins (continued)

**1852 **
There are a great many kinds of sins. Scripture provides several lists of them. The Letter to the Galatians contrasts the works of the flesh with the fruit of the Spirit: “Now the works of the flesh are plain: fornication, impurity, licentiousness, idolatry, sorcery, enmity, strife, jealousy, anger, selfishness, dissension, factions, envy, drunkenness, carousing, and the like. I warn you, as I warned you before, that those who do such things shall not inherit the Kingdom of God.”

---

“Therefore I tell you, every sin and blasphemy will be forgiven men, but the blasphemy against the Spirit will not be forgiven.” There are no limits to the mercy of God, but anyone who deliberately refuses to accept his mercy by repenting, rejects the forgiveness of his sins and the salvation offered by the Holy Spirit. Such hardness of heart can lead to final impenitence and eternal loss.

…

V. The Proliferation of Sin

**1865 **
Sin creates a proclivity to sin; it engenders vice by repetition of the same acts. This results in perverse inclinations which cloud conscience and corrupt the concrete judgment of good and evil. Thus sin tends to reproduce itself and reinforce itself, but it cannot destroy the moral sense at its root.

1866
Vices can be classified according to the virtues they oppose, or also be linked to the capital sins which Christian experience has distinguished, following St. John Cassian and St. Gregory the Great. They are called “capital” because they engender other sins, other vices. They are pride, avarice, envy, wrath, lust, gluttony, and sloth or acedia.

**1867 **
The catechetical tradition also recalls that there are “sins that cry to heaven”: the blood of Abel, the sin of the Sodomites, the cry of the people oppressed in Egypt, the cry of the foreigner, the widow, and the orphan, injustice to the wage earner.

1868
Sin is a personal act. Moreover, we have a responsibility for the sins committed by others

• when we cooperate in them:
• by participating directly and voluntarily in them;
• by ordering, advising, praising, or approving them;
• by not disclosing or not hindering them when we have an obligation to do so;
• by protecting evil-doers.

**1869 **
Thus sin makes men accomplices of one another and causes concupiscence, violence, and injustice to reign among them. Sins give rise to social situations and institutions that are contrary to the divine goodness. “Structures of sin” are the expression and effect of personal sins. They lead their victims to do evil in their turn. In an analogous sense, they constitute a “social sin.”

. . . thank You Jesus+
​

 

[bpbasilphx]

Don’t you get it?

It’s only OTHER PEOPLE’S sins (real or perceived) that are so serious.

One’s own sins aren’t that significant.

That’s a wide-spread attitude.

 

[Shoshana]

Don’t you get it?

It’s only OTHER PEOPLE’S sins (real or perceived) that are so serious.

One’s own sins aren’t that significant.

That’s a wide-spread attitude.

 

[Hesychios]

Are some sins more serious than others? If you believe that some sins are indeed more serious than others how do you personally assess which ones are more serious? Why are there only “Seven Deadly Sins”? If you were asked to compile an addendum to that list titled, 1001 Sins That Aren’t Quite So Serious what sins would you list and why would you include them?

Curiously,
Mick

I don’t know that there is a hard and fast delineation between most sins into one category or another. I do, however believe that there are sins that are very great and sins that are minor and a whole range of sins from the least to the greatest.

The law of God is written on our hearts.

 

[Zooey]

Well, I believe that stealing a quarter from Donald Trump is a less serious sin than stealing a quarter from a starving man who only has a quarter. (Although, I guess that cancels my invitation to DT’s next birthday party:bighanky::sad_bye.
Other than that, I don’t think that list-making is really very productive.:twocents:

 

[Zooey]

Don’t you get it?

It’s only OTHER PEOPLE’S sins (real or perceived) that are so serious.

One’s own sins aren’t that significant.

That’s a wide-spread attitude.

[SIGN]
:tiphat:Message for Mr bpbasilphx; :tiphat:message for Mr bpbasilphx:
[SIGN]:aok::yyeess:[/SIGN]
[/SIGN]