C
carmenp1
Guest
Well said.
Maybe you could go speak to your priest or religious ed director in your parish.I am so used to going to my bible for references, I have no idea what this means.
What is he saying? I can understand my bible but this is very confusing.
Carmen
You distort the Church’s teaching.May I respectfully suggest that readers who are interested in the current science of human evolution read post 133 and then google cladistics cladograms. There are some fascinating drawings. Some illustrations of the “beginning of life” may or may not be redrawn due to a recent challenge to the work of Dr. Carl Woese.
Note: This is a reputable site. evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/home.php
Some younger readers may not know the scientific reference to the Piltdown Man era. That was a great theory until the hoax was proven. This is my own opinion. To me, the work of dedicated scientists during that period emphasized the need for precise genetic descriptions for individual species. Still, scientists will point to the brow ridge as physical evidence of a species.
But I digress. My point is that there is a lot of *stuff *involved in the science of human evolution. As pointed out in post 133, there is a particular conclusion which intersects with the Catholic doctrine on human origin.
From post 133.
“In English, the above means that the science of human evolution concludes that two sole real true fully-complete human parents are not the originating founders of the human species. Instead, an originating humanizing population of random breeding individuals in hundreds to thousands is the only source of humankind. It should not surprise people that the Catholic Church would challenge this conclusion.”
Regarding the Address of Saint John Paul II to the Pontifical Academy of Sciences (October 22, 1996) newadvent.org/library/docs_jp02tc.htm
If this thread starts discussing human nature as taught by the Catholic Church, my suggestion is to study paragraph 5. Saint John Paul II directly opposes another science of human evolution theory. He uses the very strong words of “incompatible with the truth of man.”
No. I filter everything through the Word of God. There was no biblical reference noted to base whatever it was they were saying. If there is no scriptural base to give it validity, it should be treated as opinion or doctrine derived from non-scriptural sources.Maybe you could go speak to your priest or religious ed director in your parish.
In any event, it is important that we be able to separate opinions on the internet from what the Church says.
Shall we look at the complete concept of God’s will. ???Very good post. Since the Christian God supposedly created with infallible foreknowledge and pre-ordained all future events (see the Catholic Encyclopedia) , then he willed the version of creation that we see. If so, he willed the fall of man and everything else that has followed.
To the OP, of course their had to be two original human beings. These would be the simians who first attained true consciousness. Along with that consciousness cane the ability to think and act freely. No divine intervention needed.
Thank you for this wonderful insight on Genesis 2: 19.Genesis 2:19 “Out of the ground the Lord God formed every beast of the field and every bird of the air, and brought them to Adam to see what he would call them. And whatever Adam called each living creature, that was it’s name.” This passage describes again how God created all the beasts, birds etc. but the subject He leads us to is that God brought them to Adam to name them.
The fact that Adam was intelligent enough to be able to come up with all these names is pretty awesome. I don’t think I would be able to do that. What a huge undertaking! It’s better to take God at His word so you don’t get bogged down with “did God really literally start with Adam from scratch?” Where Adam and Eve real? If God started from scratch with the animals I think He could have done the same with Adam.
What we miss are the gems right in front of us that God is trying to show us. Is God not omnipresent, all powerful, is anything too hard for God. For us, definitely. We find it too hard sometimes to just believe God is telling it to us as He did it.
Carmen
Shall we look at the complete concept of God’s will. ???Very good post. Since the Christian God supposedly created with infallible foreknowledge and pre-ordained all future events (see the Catholic Encyclopedia) , then he willed the version of creation that we see. If so, he willed the fall of man and everything else that has followed.
To the OP, of course their had to be two original human beings. These would be the simians who first attained true consciousness. Along with that consciousness cane the ability to think and act freely. No divine intervention needed.
Good Morning (name removed by moderator): If you were all knowing and all powerful and not subject to the random outcomes of procreation like humans are, then I would say that you create 5.If you had 10 Children and 5 ended up evil hardened criminals even though they were raised right and the other 5 ended up as loving kind model citizens and you can know the out come before your children are all conceived do you not have children? Or do you take the good with bad and create all 10 for the sake of the 5 that will love you and do good?
I how many people wake up in the morning just craving a good dose of hell.Hell is just God giving people what they want.
Good post!Shall we look at the complete concept of God’s will. ???
First. It should be observable that humans are not merely foreknowledge of an event.
Please notice the dramatic shift from Genesis 1: 25 to Genesis 1:26. The observed sky, earth, water, night, day are creation events that are basically static, fixed, stationary in their material capabilities. The living creatures, while they are mobile and need nourishment, depend on their material environment while living and at death, their physical/material anatomy becomes another part of the material environment. Genesis 1: 26 obviously explains why the human creatures are different from all other species.
One of the major differences is that humans have a goal beyond the physical. This is demonstrated in Genesis 2: 15-17. As stated in Genesis 1: 26-27, humans have a spiritual principle. Our nature unites both the material world and the spiritual world. We are called to share, by knowledge and love, in the life of the Divine Creator. (*CCC *355-356) Our spiritual principle (intellective rational soul) includes the freedom of actions. (CCC 295; CCC 1730-1732)
Being all powerful, the transcendent, super-natural, Pure Spirit without material restrictions, the Divine Creator, has complete freedom of His actions. In creating the unique human nature, God gave us the dignity of a person who can initiate and control our actions. (CCC 357; CCC 1730) I can see eyes light up. What about severely handicapped humans?
Quote from *CCC *1260
**1260 **“Since Christ died for all, and since all men are in fact called to one and the same destiny, which is divine, we must hold that the Holy Spirit offers to all the possibility of being made partakers, in a way known to God, of the Paschal mystery.”
We humans are smart, but God is smarter.
It should be plain common sense, that if all humans, regardless of human impediments, have the opportunity to share in the spiritual life of our Creator, then God must insure that all humans have that spiritual ability.
:doh2:
God made sure that every human absolutely is in the image of God. He made sure that all humans could reach the eternal joy in heaven by having all humans descend from the first two humans who appeared on planet earth.
That’s not how I interpret this passage…God, knowing the future, said, “I will make him a helper.” First, God brings all the animals He already made to have Adam name them & see if maybe Adam would settle for a puppy.But Genesis 2:18 says, “Then the Lord God said, ‘It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him a helper as his partner.’” This indicates that God specifically made the animals after he had made man because He did not want man to be alone. It doesn’t say, “It is not good that the man should be alone; I have already made him a helper as his partner.” It says, “I will make him a helper as his partner.”
Right. That’s a case of the translator helping out believers who might otherwise have a difficultyMy Bible says in Genesis 2:19 “Now the Lord God had formed out of the ground all the beasts of the field…” etc.
“Had formed” means to me …previously formed them in Genesis 1!
No problem here.![]()
If God knew the out come of the human race, he already knew that it would take two fully complete humans, male and female to procreate the rest of mankind. Why would he bring the animals to Adam, then decide to create a mate from Adam. That doesn’t make sense.That’s not how I interpret this passage…God, knowing the future, said, “I will make him a helper.” First, God brings all the animals He already made to have Adam name them & see if maybe Adam would settle for a puppy.
Then when none were acceptable God made the woman out of Adam’s rib. Simple.![]()
Why not? These stories are for our benefit, not God’s. Can you see beyond the mere words to the understanding that the author is trying to convey? I believe the most fundamental meaning of this section is the show that among God’s creatures, humans are peerless.If God knew the out come of the human race, he already knew that it would take two fully complete humans, male and female to procreate the rest of mankind. Why would he bring the animals to Adam, then decide to create a mate from Adam. That doesn’t make sense.
You existence is proof that they did.In Gen 1 God’s first command to his Two Humans is to be fruitful and multiply, did they not listen to this first command?![]()
In Genesis 1, God gives an overview of man’s creation. He gives a detailed account in Genesis 2 .If God knew the out come of the human race, he already knew that it would take two fully complete humans, male and female to procreate the rest of mankind. Why would he bring the animals to Adam, then decide to create a mate from Adam. That doesn’t make sense.
In Gen 1 God’s first command to his Two Humans is to be fruitful and multiply, did they not listen to this first command?![]()
A puppy?? Have I missed the humour in your comment? Or are you serious?That’s not how I interpret this passage…God, knowing the future, said, “I will make him a helper.” First, God brings all the animals He already made to have Adam name them & see if maybe Adam would settle for a puppy.
Then when none were acceptable God made the woman out of Adam’s rib. Simple.![]()
Genesis 1:29 "And God said, “See, I have given you every herb that yields seed which is on the face of all the earth, and every tree whose fruit yields seed; to you it shall be for food. Also, to every beast of the earth, to every bird of the air, and to everything that creeps on the earth, in which there is life, I have given every green herb for food, and it was so”My question is as simple as that. I’m curious.
Genesis 1:29 "And God said, “See, I have given you every herb that yields seed which is on the face of all the earth, and every tree whose fruit yields seed; to you it shall be for food. Also, to every beast of the earth, to every bird of the air, and to everything that creeps on the earth, in which there is life, I have given every green herb for food, and it was so”My question is as simple as that. I’m curious.
No I can’t really, I always try to look at the text as a spiritual lesson, but don’t always see it.Why not? These stories are for our benefit, not God’s. Can you see beyond the mere words to the understanding that the author is trying to convey? I believe the most fundamental meaning of this section is the show that among God’s creatures, humans are peerless.
You existence is proof that they did.
To me, Gen 1 gives an account that is very much in line with how science explains the world evolving, (the water, plants, animals came first etc and then the humans). God creates humans in his image, male and female and commands they be fruitful and multiply, no need to seek any other form of being for his peerless humans.In Genesis 1, God gives an overview of man’s creation. He gives a detailed account in Genesis 2 .
Yes that was my little joke.A puppy?? Have I missed the humour in your comment? Or are you serious?
Carmen