J
jack_hawkins
Guest
this figure of 30,000 has been debunked and shouldn’t be cited as if it were true
1.The Teaching Magisterium [to varying degrees],
2.The centrality of the Eucharist and Real Presence
3.he Sacraments of the Church.
Thank you. I wonder what book of statistics that would be - everyone seems to have a copy except me.It comes from a book of statistics that also claims that the Catholic Church has over 300 denominations.
My grammar was incorrect: those Christians who are not Catholic Christians do have choices, just as Catholic Christians do. These choices are made on the basis of an informed conscience. I think you know what that means.Could you say that again in a simpler way? I’m afraid I don’t know what it means.(The choice of an informed conscience is to do the right thing. I’m not sure what that has to do with Protestantism, or how Protestantism could ever be a right choice.)
I think the only question that needs asking here is ‘How do you define denomination’? If by that you mean churches like the small apostolic sects that abound in a number of countries (we have about 6000 here in our country of 50m people), then there may be about 6+million similar churches. However, as there are only about 70 million reformed church Christians associated with the World Council of Churches, the number seems too high by far.At the last official count, Protestants have 6,743,982 denominations
Now common sense says they cannot all be right
- Protestants believe in ‘Sola Scriptura’
- Therefore ‘Sola Scriptura’ is the cause of 6,743,982 denominations.
Catholicism has Left and Right, Liberal and Conservative, Charasmatic and Traditional, Progressive and Traditional, but they ALL agree about three things:
1.The Teaching Magisterium [to varying degrees],
2.The centrality of the Eucharist and Real Presence
3.he Sacraments of the Church.
That by my books makes them ‘one’!![]()
jmcrae is explaining what is set out in the Catechism. I don’t call it nothing! Just because people have different beliefs than you does not mean they don’t have their “act together”. However, I can see how post to which you are responding seems to point the “guilty” finger at all protestants. In truth, most protestants have no clue about the obligations jmcrae spells out here, and are therefore invincibly ignorant. They only know what they are taught, and most protestants are non-sacramental. I disagree on one point with jmcrae, that is the application of the term “heretic”. While such persons are not practicing within the fullness of the truth as revealed by Jesus through His apostles, they cannot be rightly called heretics. In order to qualify for that title, one must first know the truth, then willfully turn from it. Since most protesants have been taught errors about Catholicism from the beginning, they may be misguided, but don’t qualify as heretics. Now, if they listen to John Corapi and THEN turn away, that is another story…Oh goodness me: where did this come from!? I thought you were getting your act together, but this is simply the kind of biased opinion that you were setting out a few weeks ago, on the basis of nothing.
I have trouble understanding your point of view on how different doctrines keep interpretation clean. It is true that diversity helps build each other up using our different God given gifts. Although when different doctrines contradict each other it is more of a cloudiness than clean interpretation. When we proclaim the holiness of our Lord to each other we shed light upon one another of the Truth, which happens to be absolute. When we differ and say its alright to have our own truths, then we preach relativism which is harmful to each others faith and make it harder for us to see the fullness of Truth.Each denomination has a different take on important aspects of belief, of faith, and I think it is this diversity that keeps interpretation clean, that allows those who have strong practical social consciences to join certain churches, and those who prefer to be led by strongly applied doctrine to join others.
I don’t have a copy of it, either, which is why I don’t attempt to count the number of Protestant denominations.Thank you. I wonder what book of statistics that would be - everyone seems to have a copy except me.
Not all choices are informed choices. Sometimes the information we have (and upon which we base our decisions) is inaccurate.My grammar was incorrect: those Christians who are not Catholic Christians do have choices, just as Catholic Christians do. These choices are made on the basis of an informed conscience. I think you know what that means.
In the case of that particular person, there were still some pieces of information missing. When the missing pieces of information were provided to her, she did not delay in converting.Someone once wrote that it took her 17 years to decide to join the Catholic Church, although she was already an actively practising Christian. She wrote that in the end (and I quote)
I could not help thinking of a Catholic friend of mine who had died amid the chanting of Rosaries and the Prayers for the Sick, and felt a little jealous. The words of Oscar Wilde came to me at that moment - “It is better to die a Catholic.” Looking back later, I also realized in a very profound way that what one’s relatives think of one at the end of one’s life is so completely unimportant, compared to what God thinks of one, and also, I suddenly realized that the reason I had been avoiding converting to the Catholic Church was because of what my parents and brother and husband would think of me.
Two things strike me here. First, that it is difficult to make an informed choice, even if it is searching us out, and even if we are actively searching it out. Ultimately however, the correct choice will be revealed if we allow ourselves to be accessible to it. This is not an easy thing to do for anyone.
I think my brother may have let the cat out of the bag when he jokingly said to me one time, “I hate your Church because it’s not up to me what the rules are for you any more - and I don’t even know the people who do make your rules for you, so I can’t even bribe them!”Secondly, her choice was made in the face of familial disapproval. (I think that is what was implied in the quote). Why did her family disapprove? I feel very much the same: my friends and my family are not happy at all about my quest to join the Catholic Church.
That seems wildly inflated. Are there even that many Protestants in the whole world?At the last official count, Protestants have 6,743,982 denominations
- Protestants believe in ‘Sola Scriptura’
- Therefore ‘Sola Scriptura’ is the cause of 6,743,982 denominations.
Even if there were only two or three, this would still be so.Now common sense says they cannot all be right![]()
Catholicism has Left and Right, Liberal and Conservative, Charasmatic and Traditional, Progressive and Traditional, but they ALL agree about three things:
Code:1.The Teaching Magisterium [to varying degrees], 2.The centrality of the Eucharist and Real Presence 3.he Sacraments of the Church.
Actually it’s the fact that we are all joined in full communion with Peter’s Successor that makes us One.That by my books makes them ‘one’!![]()
Free will.Because Christ is omniscient, knows the future, he must have known there would be a fragmentation of His universal church on earth. He did not try to stop it by intervening to prevent schism. So why is it fragmented still.?
There is a lot of Catholic bashing here. I just read two very rude comments on another thread.? I feel very much the same: my friends and my family are not happy at all about my quest to join the Catholic Church.
Why do many people who are not Catholic congregants have a bias towards this particular Church? Why do Catholics on this Forum feel they are being attacked?
I think this is a little strong. Defensiveness, maybe. Not paranoia. Paranoia suggests that attacks are not happening, when in fact, they are.There is inevitably an element of paranoia here - because defence of the faith is a paramount consideration.
Other reasons for what? The defensiveness you find here?There are other reasons however, and they perhaps have to do with the perception outsiders have of Catholicism as a whole, and the fear it perpetuates among those who do not know it. This is parallel perhaps to the disdain Catholics have for those who are not the same as they are.
The servant is not greater than the Master!Ultimately, what I am trying to think about is why the Catholic Church is rabidly attacked by some, and disliked and even feared by others. What emanates from its essence that leads others to fear and, often unjustly, chastise it?
Evidently you did not hesitate long enough.I hesitate to ask, but I would be interested in knowing where your obsession with Luther comes from?
You have no way of knowing that. Please do not attempt to mindread. :hypno: Thank you.He seems to symbolise the entire period of the Reformation and the Counter-Reformation for you.
I posted what I thought was necessary for this thread. Unlike you I am loathe to take up two pages to post what I have to contribute.There is a much broader and far more complex picture to be painted here
‘Central’ importance? How many figures do you consider to be of ‘central’ importance? Moreover, since you are interested in those ‘many more figures’ whom I have left out, please feel free to champion their causes at length.and many more figures of central importance to the schism within the Roman Church. Perhaps it would help us all if you could elaborate slightly beyond this one figure.
You have not demonstrated that it is biassed opinion. I note that you often do not respond to content by contributing reasoned and referenced points of your own but instead rely heavily on rhetorical judgments of other people’s points.Oh goodness me: where did this come from!? I thought you were getting your act together, but this is simply the kind of biased opinion that you were setting out a few weeks ago, on the basis of nothing.
From my experience it is due to ignorance and false teachings of those on the outside looking in. Complancency of those who read the bible and think they have full revelation of the Word of God and can therefore judge others by their own interpretation of the Truth. Their are false presumptions and prejudice in abundance about the actual teachings and doctries of the Church.Why do many people who are not Catholic congregants have a bias towards this particular Church? Why do Catholics on this Forum feel they are being attacked? There is inevitably an element of paranoia here - because defence of the faith is a paramount consideration.
Another unsupported and unwarranted putdown.Sophistry?
Indeed it was. Hence the political chaos which ensued and which the reformers took full advantage of.And one of the concerns of the reformers was the intervention of civil authorities in the affairs of the Church.
And another unsupported and unwarranted putdown.Maybe no time for thinking either?
Non sequitur (sadly).Because Christ is omniscient, knows the future, he must have known there would be a fragmentation of His universal church on earth. He did not try to stop it by intervening to prevent schism. So why is it fragmented still.? Perhaps because the defiance and mocking is not all on one side, sadly.
Wow, another unsupported and unwarranted putdown.I would not put myself or my spirit in the hands of many people on this thread, protestant or Catholic.
I am not sure if that is a sentence. If it is, then it is definitely a run-on. In any case it is a strawman. Church members may be in error. The Magisterium may not be.But it is particularly the certainty of members of CC that they are in every case, circumstance, interpretation, rite, doctrine, dogma, dictat (etc etc you get the idea) absolutely correct and servants and purveyors of the Absolute Truth (absolutely unproveable), and the way in which that certainty is presented to us all, that is difficult to engage with.
Wiser to speak for yourself. ‘All’ is a lot of people.And we are all aware of that.
Probably for the same reason that He let the unbelieving disciples go their way, in John 6:67, without saying, “Hey, wait! If that’s too hard for you, I can make it easier!”
this figure of 30,000 has been debunked and shouldn’t be cited as if it were true
(Ani grimly holds the sides of her chair to keep herself from falling off. Ani falls off anyway and takes the chair down with her.)At the last official count, Protestants have 6,743,982 denominations
You forgot the Cafeteria. D-oh! :doh2: Oh yeah, it’s closed. But we can still count it, can’t we?Catholicism has Left and Right, Liberal and Conservative, Charasmatic and Traditional, Progressive and Traditional