Nick9,
“This is what the Zacchaeus story suggests to me.”
I agree. Not everyone is meant to serve their neighbor by selling all their possessions and Christ was driving at the RYR’s idol of money which does not apply to everyone. But that passage is generally used to support the evangelical counsel of poverty/charity (meaning one gives up everything, whether it be money or other affections/idols in service of Christ). Again, these counsels/acts are considered superogatory, beyond the minimum, but Christ did immediately say it’s hard for a rich man to
enter heaven, which makes no sense if it was something “extra” that not everyone needs to worry about, only the more “holy” people.
“There has to be a deliberate element in our sin for it to be idolatry. We can commit a sin through human weakness, such as tiredness, fear, or absent mindedness, which is not a rejection of God’s will because it was not done with full consent against that will.”
Agreed, but if one realizes that whenever they are not obeying the 2GC and are putting themselves first deliberately, then it is done with full consent yes? Now many people unfortunately are likely not even aware they are sinning many times daily when putting their own interests first, but if “scrupulous” people are (not sure what is so scrupulous about it though), then they seem to be sinning. As James says, “to the one who knows to do good and does it not, it is sin”.
“Also, not all sins are of equal gravity.”
True, there will be different degrees of punishment (as there was in the OT) just as there are different degrees of glory. But as there is no exhaustive list of grave sins (or when certain sins change from venial to grave matter), seems one is left with just following one’s feelings as to whether some sins are grave or not. It seems from most examinations of conscience I’ve read that grave matter is more concerned with external actions and explicit violations of the decalogue (i.e. gravely committing idolatry is literally worshipping a false deity, rather than putting one’s desires first in self-idolatry or something; or stealing is literally robbing wealth (to some arbitrary extent, as a dollar would probably be considered venial) from someone, rather than stealing time from them or God to serve yourself), when thought and motivation can be just as sinful (as the Sermon on the Mount clarifies to a terrifying degree).
distracted,
“those belonging to religoius orders do not ignore the 10 C… that doesn’t make a lick of sense…”
His point was that they were missing/ignoring to what
extent we actually do violate the 10C all the time, and the thought that their ascetic laws somehow gave them “more” to do to become more holy - no, keeping the 10C is more than enough for anyone. This kind of links back into the grave/venial distinction I was talking with nick9 about, how grave violations of the 10C are generally limited to just this very small subset of external acts, which is why Luther gives his lengthy exposition of the 10C in the large catechism (available online at
www.bookofconcord.com if you want to peruse it ever).
“Luther’s words drip with hatred & contempt…”
He definitely does not mince words and goes overboard with the hyperbole sometimes, but again he is merely trying to hammer away the full force of the law upon the believer to kill off any self-righteousness or complacency they may be feeling, not wanting it to be “watered down” as it seemed to be at the time.
“I believe we are to share with the needy our excess… & we are all ALWAYs called to give up our possessions in our heart… to detach from them totally but that is extremely difficult if not impossible to do when we have a lot of creature comforts.”
This is very true indeed. The human heart is an idol factory.