Do you ever regret learning about the Mass?

  • Thread starter Thread starter NewsTheMan
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Another point of order for the above is that the “bells” rung by the Altar Servers do not serve a sacramental purpose. Their sole purpose is to “awake” the congregation - who may be distracted - to what is sacramentaly occurring on the altar.
Well, bells are used at the reformed Mass, as well. They may not serve a “sacramental” purpose but they do serve a ceremonial one, at this point, even though their use might have originated in practicality. All of the Mass’s ceremony, in fact, originated in practicality.
 
The Last Gospel is gone because, like many other elements of the Tridentine form, it was completely out of place. It was an add-on: an odd innovation; one of a number of innovations that spoiled the flow and purity of the Roman Rite. We come to the dismissal, then, instead of being actually permitted to leave, as the celebrant has instructed us to, we’re back to the Gospel, again. “Go. That is the Mass…well, except for this: one more Gospel…hold on…” It was nonsensical.

…]

If you ask me, the correct way to observe the two is not as “traditional” vs. “modern” but as “Gallican” vs. “Roman”. Today’s ordinary form of Mass–when presented properly–is purely Roman in structure, whereas the “old” Mass was heavily-burdened by awkward Gallican innovations, the awkwardly-situtated Last Gospel being but one of them.
The Defence rests.

Here’s a tip: this is the Traditional Catholic forum on CAF. Generally people here prefer the TLM over the NO. If you want to attack the TLM you’re going to spark an argument. If you sincerely want to avoid wasting the Moderator’s time in dealing with division and debate I suggest you reconsider posting such untraditional opinions here.
 
The Defence rests.
Not a very good defense team. Any intelligent person will realize from the context that I was referring to the positioning of the Last Gospel, not the Last Gospel, itself.
Here’s a tip: this is the Traditional Catholic forum on CAF. Generally people here prefer the TLM over the NO. If you want to attack the TLM you’re going to spark an argument. If you sincerely want to avoid wasting the Moderator’s time in dealing with division and debate I suggest you reconsider posting such untraditional opinions here.
My opinions are 100% traditional and I intend to spark no argument, only to participate in the dialogue. Ignorance of the facts does not equate to a more traditional opinion, I hope. The fact is, I am a traditional Catholic, if not a “traditionalist” Catholic, which is something different.

As you point out, the forum is called “Traditional Catholicism”, not “Traditionalist Catholicism”, so I feel I am well within my rights to post here.
 
Any intelligent person will realize …
Ah, resorting to insults. Your posts speak for themselves.

Check the forum rules under the EF vs OF. Traditional Catholics do not attack the Traditional Latin Mass.

"This is the Traditional Catholicism forum. It is intended for the discussion of traditional Catholicism not the practices of the Church today. It is intended for traditional Catholics.

Non-traditional Catholics, Catholics of other rites, and non-Catholics are welcome to participate in the TC forum, however, they will not be allowed to dominate conversations or to push agendas which are not in keeping with the purpose of this forum.

Above all, civility and charity are to be observed at all times."

Patrick Eastin

forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?t=127816&page=2

Hope this helps.
 
The Defence rests.

Here’s a tip: this is the Traditional Catholic forum on CAF. Generally people here prefer the TLM over the NO. If you want to attack the TLM you’re going to spark an argument. If you sincerely want to avoid wasting the Moderator’s time in dealing with division and debate I suggest you reconsider posting such untraditional opinions here.
Agreed 👍
 
I don’t see the issue with the Last Gospel. It is Sacred Scripture and no more nonsensical than the extra readings inside the Ordinary Form, for example.

Or is it just strictly semantics as to what’s part of the Mass again? What it help if we call it outside the Mass, similar to the Leonine Prayers, Asperges Me, Benediction, and the people’s communion?

And what would be the harm if they were to include the Last Gospel inside the OF Mass?
 
No, but I have attended a 30 minute Novus Ordo.

This point came up as a couple people made vague references to the liturgical abuses of the TLM pre-V2. I like knowing what those are specifically and all I ever get is express Masses and the ol’ “Father was drunk” by altar boys at the time.
Unfortunately (or perhaps fortunately) people did not take photos during Mass years ago. Occassionally, during some historical event photographers would be allowed in. But it was uncommon for people to take snap shots during Mass out of respect. My dad was the volunteer photographer when I made my First Communion. As I recall, he took the pictures after Mass. His camera was one that had the glass plates in it and he had to pull a cover over his head. Later he got a smaller camera with an adjustable lense. Even today, when we have special Masses like First Communions or weddings, photographers and relatives with cameras are instructed as to where they may or may not stand to take photos. They are not allowed to go up into the sanctuary. And flashes should not be going off during the consecration. Years ago, they certainly did not have access to a video camera as people do today. So that is one reason why you may not see any evidence of liturgical abuse pre-V2.
 
No, but I have attended a 30 minute Novus Ordo.
Mine are 15-minutes if you take away the sermon and people’s communion. I don’t see this as an abuse as long as all the proper texts are read.
 
Unfortunately (or perhaps fortunately) people did not take photos during Mass years ago. Occassionally, during some historical event photographers would be allowed in. But it was uncommon for people to take snap shots during Mass out of respect. My dad was the volunteer photographer when I made my First Communion. As I recall, he took the pictures after Mass. His camera was one that had the glass plates in it and he had to pull a cover over his head. Later he got a smaller camera with an adjustable lense. Even today, when we have special Masses like First Communions or weddings, photographers and relatives with cameras are instructed as to where they may or may not stand to take photos. They are not allowed to go up into the sanctuary. And flashes should not be going off during the consecration. Years ago, they certainly did not have access to a video camera as people do today. So that is one reason why you may not see any evidence of liturgical abuse pre-V2.
I remember in many weddings I’ve attended, before the start the priest will remind the photographers to shut off all their equipment during the Consecration. No photo or video. All pay reverence.
 
I remember in many weddings I’ve attended, before the start the priest will remind the photographers to shut off all their equipment during the Consecration. No photo or video. All pay reverence.
I just remembered something funny. Saturday morning, we heard “ribbet, ribbet” at Mass. Somebody’s phone was indicating a message or something. And this reminded my husband that he forgot to shut off his cell phone. He was afraid that if he turned it off now, it would make a lot of noise, so he just attempted to set it on vibrate. Well he must have set it for vibrate and ring because it did ring. So he just opened it up and closed it real quick. He said, “I put it on vibrate.” " I said, well just turn it off now." He said, “But it will make noise if I turn it off.” Well, whoever it was they just called right back. So this time he left it open so whoever it was would get the hint that he was at Mass. Finally he closed it and it told him to go ahead and turn it off. He said, “But it was make noise!” I said, “that’s OK, Father will appreciate it”
 
To me, today’s Mass is the Church’s “old” Mass, reformed. I mean, isn’t that the case, really, after all? I don’t think the Church Fathers at Vatican II said, “let’s get rid of the Roman Mass and make a new thing to replace it.” No. They reformed the Mass that was there.
Here’s the closest quote I can find addressing this:
How the liturgy fell apart: the enigma of Archbishop Bugnini
How has this command of the Council been obeyed? The answer can be obtained from Father Joseph Gelineau SJ, a Council peritus, and an enthusiastic proponent of the postconciliar revolution. In his book Demain la liturgie, he stated with commendable honesty, concerning the Mass as most Catholics know it today: “To tell the truth it is a different liturgy of the Mass. This needs to be said without ambiguity: the Roman Rite as we knew it no longer exists. It has been destroyed.” Even Archbishop Bugnini would have found it difficult to explain how something can be preserved and fostered by destroying it.
These are the kinds of things I regret learning about Mass. I am trying to find new, productive ways of dealing with some things that I see happening in Church. ** Sitting at the front helps a lot!**
 
Ah, resorting to insults. Your posts speak for themselves.
Check the forum rules under the EF vs OF. Traditional Catholics do not attack the Traditional Latin Mass.
I apologize if you were insulted by the phrase “intelligent person”. I have not, anywhere, attacked any Mass. Incidentally, to me, the “Traditional Latin Mass” would refer to any Catholic Mass celebrated in Latin, whatever Missal is used. I am assuming that you mean Pope John XXIII’s Missal. I have not attacked it, I only say that the Roman Catholic Church reformed it. That is a matter of historical fact.

Ockham, that someone should offer a broadening of a conversation and introduce facts that cause you to become unsettled cannot be regarded as an attack upon tradition or upon the 1962 Missal, as though your sensibilities were somehow representative of the standard of Catholic tradition. Your opinions–however they may have been formed–do not equal Catholic tradition.

I have to say, I find your “we don’t take kindly to yer types 'round here” attitude unchristian and appalling, to be honest. How do you stand in judgment of my credentials as a Roman Catholic, traditional or otherwise? Because I have the audacity to present facts and scholarship, you question my orthodoxy?

Go on ahead and quote the moderators. Apparently nothing I have thus far remarked upon in this thread has signalled to them an unworthiness on my part to participate in this forum.
 
I apologize if you were insulted by the phrase “intelligent person”. I have not, anywhere, attacked any Mass. Incidentally, to me, the “Traditional Latin Mass” would refer to any Catholic Mass celebrated in Latin, whatever Missal is used. I am assuming that you mean Pope John XXIII’s Missal. I have not attacked it, I only say that the Roman Catholic Church reformed it. That is a matter of historical fact.
I wasn’t insulted by your assertion that I’m not an intelligent person because you have lost credibility; it was an attempt to insult. By calling the Last Gospel (and other elements of the TLM) nonsensical you’ve also insulted the Mass. By failing to admit this you may be at risk of violating the Eighth Commandment. You have not presented any facts, merely your opinion so unless you are a bishop your opinion holds no authority. The moderators of an indepenedent chatroom are free to interpret the actions of the participants as they wish. The last time I checked this website does not bear an Imprimatur. So unless you have anything factual to add to the discussion please excuse me from replying to useless posts.
 
Here’s the closest quote I can find addressing this:
How the liturgy fell apart: the enigma of Archbishop Bugnini

These are the kinds of things I regret learning about Mass. I am trying to find new, productive ways of dealing with some things that I see happening in Church. ** Sitting at the front helps a lot!**
Back to the topic, I don’t regret learning about both forms of the Mass as one has greatly increased my spirituality and put me back on the path the Church teaches. I wish more people learned about Archbishop Bugnini and the events that lead to the Novus Ordo. Knowledge is power.
 
I wasn’t insulted by your assertion that I’m not an intelligent person because you have lost credibility; it was an attempt to insult. By calling the Last Gospel (and other elements of the TLM) nonsensical you’ve also insulted the Mass. By failing to admit this you may be at risk of violating the Eighth Commandment. You have not presented any facts, merely your opinion so unless you are a bishop your opinion holds no authority. The moderators of an indepenedent chatroom are free to interpret the actions of the participants as they wish. The last time I checked this website does not bear an Imprimatur. So unless you have anything factual to add to the discussion please excuse me from replying to useless posts.
Enough. That one should call into question the orthodoxy of a stranger on a discussion board merely because he presented certain facts that disturbed you is out of line and uncalled for as it is; to further accuse him of violating the Eighth Commandment is simply beyond the pale. I’m appalled.

However, allow me to introduce myself: I am a traditional Roman Catholic male who advocates the following with respect to the presentation of the liturgy:
  1. More widespread use of Latin in the liturgy (especially during the canon of the Mass)
  2. The ad-orientem posture of the celebrant at Mass
  3. The liberal use of incense and the ringing of bells
  4. The greater use of Gregorian Chant and sacred polyphony
  5. Orthodox doctrine preached from the pulpit
  6. The use of beautiful sacred vestments of quality (be they gothic, baroque, or other), as opposed to the cheap and/or manifestly ugly vestments one typically encounters.
  7. The use of male servers properly vested in cassock and surplice
  8. The proper training of clergy, other ministers, and servers in the proper, deliberate, careful, and reverent performance of their ceremonial functions
  9. One main altar per chancel
  10. The prohibition of the guitar and piano at Mass
  11. An end to “freelance” celebrations: stick to the prescribed texts and the rubrics!
While I no longer limit myself to attendance at Mass celebrated according to the 1962 Missal (as I once did), I am no less a traditional Catholic. And I do not require your validation of my Catholic credentials. None of us does.
 
Could you please get back to the thread’s topic and away from discussing people? You may be a wonderful person but it isn’t relevant to this discussion. Thank you.
 
Back to the topic,** I don’t regret learning about both forms of the Mass as one has greatly increased my spirituality and put me back on the path the Church teaches**. I wish more people learned about Archbishop Bugnini and the events that lead to the Novus Ordo. Knowledge is power.
Yes Ockham, that’s what we all must learn to do.
No matter what happens at an individual Mass, IT IS STILL THE HOLY SACRIFICE OF THE MASS, under either form.
I’m getting better at this. I’m learning to block out most things that disturb me. I won’t participate in rude behaviour (clapping) but I now participate in the Memorial Acclamation.
 
As a Catholic you have a duty to perform: ewtn.com/expert/answers/cdw_liturgical_abuses.htm
Absolutely the best advice I’ve seen, so far. From the site you linked us to:
“Any Catholic, whether Priest or Deacon or lay member of Christ’s faithful, has the right to lodge a complaint regarding a liturgical abuse to the diocesan Bishop or the competent Ordinary equivalent to him in law, or to the Apostolic See on account of the primacy of the Roman Pontiff.[290] It is fitting, however, insofar as possible, that the report or complaint be submitted first to the diocesan Bishop. This is naturally to be done in truth and charity.”

Cake in Church? People talking in the Communion line? Ive been to Masses with Liturgical dancers, Power Point presentations held in FRONT of the “table”, I’ve been told from the pulpit that I MUST pray for gay couples adopting children for they are families just like my own, but I’ve NEVER read about so much claptrap as the OP. describes it…all in one Mass. The white-haired hippies of the 60’s are on their way out, still this kind of thing must be reported.
 
Absolutely the best advice I’ve seen, so far. From the site you linked us to:
“Any Catholic, whether Priest or Deacon or lay member of Christ’s faithful, has the right to lodge a complaint regarding a liturgical abuse to the diocesan Bishop or the competent Ordinary equivalent to him in law, or to the Apostolic See on account of the primacy of the Roman Pontiff.[290] It is fitting, however, insofar as possible, that the report or complaint be submitted first to the diocesan Bishop. This is naturally to be done in truth and charity.”

Cake in Church? People talking in the Communion line? Ive been to Masses with Liturgical dancers, Power Point presentations held in FRONT of the “table”, I’ve been told from the pulpit that I MUST pray for gay couples adopting children for they are families just like my own, but I’ve NEVER read about so much claptrap as the OP. describes it…all in one Mass. The white-haired hippies of the 60’s are on their way out, still this kind of thing must be reported.
It says you have a right to complain…in truth and charity. But I didn’t see where it says you have “a duty to perform”. I’d say from your post that you have experienced quite a bit of craptrap. We are very fortunate not to have all of those abuses in our parish.
 
Redemptionis Sacramentum
  1. Complaints Regarding Abuses in Liturgical Matters
[183.] In an altogether particular manner, let everyone do all that is in their power to ensure that the Most Holy Sacrament of the Eucharist will be protected from any and every irreverence or distortion and that all abuses be thoroughly corrected. This is a most serious duty incumbent upon each and every one, and all are bound to carry it out without any favouritism.

[184.] Any Catholic, whether Priest or Deacon or lay member of Christ’s faithful, has the right to lodge a complaint regarding a liturgical abuse to the diocesan Bishop or the competent Ordinary equivalent to him in law, or to the Apostolic See on account of the primacy of the Roman Pontiff.[290] It is fitting, however, insofar as possible, that the report or complaint be submitted first to the diocesan Bishop. This is naturally to be done in truth and charity.

From the offices of the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments, Rome, on the Solemnity of the Annunciation of the Lord, 25 March 2004.

Francis Card. Arinze
Prefect

Domenico Sorrentino
Archbishop Secretary

vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/ccdds/documents/rc_con_ccdds_doc_20040423_redemptionis-sacramentum_en.html
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top