Do you have questions about Catholic beliefs & Practices

  • Thread starter Thread starter PJM
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Question; watching Chief Justice Scalia’s funeral Mass; what is in the bowls brought to the priest (Father Scalia) by (it looked like) family members? The bowls were taken to the altar.
I didn’t see it; but the body, encased in the casket is Blessed with Holy water near the end of the Mass. I have been to a GREAT many Catholic funerals, and have never seen “multiple bows”; so I’ll keep watchiing this THREAD for the answer:)

WERE they perhaps Eucharistic Ministers?

God Bless

Partick
 
I didn’t see it; but the body, encased in the casket is Blessed with Holy water near the end of the Mass. I have been to a GREAT many Catholic funerals, and have never seen “multiple bows”; so I’ll keep watchiing this THREAD for the answer:)

WERE they perhaps Eucharistic Ministers?

God Bless

Partick
Thank you for the reply! I learned from another thread it was the ciboria.
 
It seems odd (at least to me) to insist on a literal interpretation of the bread and the wine becoming actual body and blood, and then to take a position that the phrase “eats and drinks” doesn’t have to be taken literally.

Matthew 4:4 He said in reply, “It is written:‘One does not live by bread alone, but by every word that comes forth from the mouth of God.’”
In BRIEF:

Five different authors of the Bible

Mt 26: 26-28
Mk.14: 22-24
Lk. 22: 17-20
John 6: 47-57
Paul ist Cor. 11: 23-30

EACH give Testimony to its reality

As DO the Early Church it=n acceptance and practice of it., some 2,000 years ago:D

Luke 24:35
And they told what things were done in the way; and how they knew him in the breaking of the bread.

Acts Of Apostles 2:42
And they were persevering in the doctrine of the apostles, and in the communication of the breaking of bread, and in prayers.

Blessings,

PJM {Patrick}

Please look for a private message from me:)
 
Acts Of Apostles 2:42
And they were persevering in the doctrine of the apostles, and in the communication of the breaking of bread, and in prayers.
As my signature’s verse shows, I appreciate this verse very much. It seems to state the very hallmarks of intended practices as a Church. None of these four aspects of devotion were to be neglected, and each have an equality of duty and meaning.

Btw, what translation do you use?
 
There is “a time” relative to our world, and “a time” relative to events after our death.

Is the resurrection not at the end of time in this world?
The resurrection is at the second coming. It is followed by the 1000 year reign of Jesus. Then the “passing away” of heaven and earth and the creation of the new heaven and new earth.
 
The resurrection is at the second coming. It is followed by the 1000 year reign of Jesus. Then the “passing away” of heaven and earth and the creation of the new heaven and new earth.
Did I contradict this belief somehow?
 
As my signature’s verse shows, I appreciate this verse very much. It seems to state the very hallmarks of intended practices as a Church. None of these four aspects of devotion were to be neglected, and each have an equality of duty and meaning.

Btw, what translation do you use?
Thank you, and we agree

God Bless,

Patrick
 
The resurrection is at the second coming. It is followed by the 1000 year reign of Jesus. Then the “passing away” of heaven and earth and the creation of the new heaven and new earth.
By this I’m presuming you mean OUR’s not Christ?

So just what is it YOU believe out the end Times, which is what you’re reference here is?

God Bless you,

Patrick
 
Did I contradict this belief somehow?
Sorry. I did something I complained about when someone else did it. I gave an explanation without giving an answer.
Your question was:" Is the resurrection not at the end of time in this world?"
My answer should have been;“no” followed by my last post.
 
Sorry. I did something I complained about when someone else did it. I gave an explanation without giving an answer.
Your question was:" Is the resurrection not at the end of time in this world?"
My answer should have been;“no” followed by my last post.
ok, perhaps you are right… I don’t know the Teachings and the Scripture regarding the time line of these events. But I’m not sure how the Catholic understanding of Purgatory is relative, or problematic… ?
 
ok, perhaps you are right… I don’t know the Teachings and the Scripture regarding the time line of these events. But I’m not sure how the Catholic understanding of Purgatory is relative, or problematic… ?
1 Corinthians 3:11-15 has been used as evidence of purgatory, along with several other verses. U have shown ,through scriptures, that they all refer to an event that happens after Jesus returns.
I pointed out that the verse from 2 Maccabees actually states that the prayers and offerings for the dead was because of the resurrection. They were praying for God to have mercy on them when they are resurrected, as was the thief on the cross.
The only verses I did not comment on mentioned a debtor being tossed into prison. The problem with that the debtor is totally depending on someone else to pay his debt. This is more in line with the idea that Jesus paid the price and when we repent we are washes by the blood.Rev1:5
 
SORRY:)

BUT this ONLY means a large number:

GOOGLE

the meaning of NUMBERS in the bible

God Bless you,

PJM
This time is spoken of in the OT. The men will go to (New)Jerusalem in the proper season for the feasts.
This tells me there will be actual years. Revelations says there will be1000.
 
Ok so here’s a question it took me almost 30 years and having to become Anglican to realize I had. And it’s one I’m still exploring because as a lay person it hadn’t ever really come up for obvious reasons… Why do Catholic priests sometimes celebrate mass on their own?

It had never even occurred to me that this would be unusual until last night when I was speaking with my church’s Dean about our church’s daily mass. The dean indicated that on occasion no one will come for the daily mass (they hold it at noon so given the workday that can sometimes prove a problematic time as you’d imagine for parishioners). And as a result they will only perform an ante-Eucharist service (ie: they won’t proceed into the Eucharistic portion of the mass) since they aren’t permitted to perform a full mass absent a second person to celebrate it with. This is not unlike the Orthodox position on the issue as I’m finding out as well. And if I’m not mistaken the scriptural basis is at least in part from Matthew 18.
 
This time is spoken of in the OT. The men will go to (New)Jerusalem in the proper season for the feasts.
This tells me there will be actual years. Revelations says there will be1000.
Yes my friend, I am aware of that. The point that I had hoped to make is that numbers in the Bible are very often NOT what we understand them to be in present times.

Also check out this site:

http://www.agapebiblestudy.com/documents/the significance of numbers in scripture.htm

The Symbolism of Numbers in the Bible
compiled by Felix Just, S.J., Ph.D.

In many ancient cultures, including Ancient Judaism and Early Christianity, numbers were not used as precisely as we might presuppose today. Thus, numbers in the Old Testament and New Testament books are often meant symbolically, not literally. For example:
• When the Israelites wanted to say “a long time,” they would say “40 days” or “40 years.” Not concerned with meticulous precision as much as we are today, saying “forty” did not mean that they counted carefully, and the result was exactly between 39 and 41, no more and no less.

• Similarly, to say “a short time,” the Scriptures often say “on the third day” or “in three days,” but without meaning exactly 72 hours!

Consider the symbolism of other numbers used in biblical texts:

1 singularity; God in monotheism (Deut 6:4); unity for humans (John 10:16; Eph 4:4)
2 duality: contrary (light/dark, good/evil) or complimentary (material/spiritual; human/divine)
3 God’s actions: 3 “visitors” (Gen 18:2); “third day” (Exod 19:11); later “Trinity” (Matt 28:19)
3½ half of seven; thus things in process, still incomplete
4 earth, directions, winds, empires; later the four Gospels or four Evangelists
6 human work/effort (Luke 13:14); incompleteness, imperfection, lack (not yet 7)
7 days in a week, sabbath rest (Gen 2:1-3); thus natural & divine completeness/perfection
8 Jewish day of Circumcision (Exod 22:30); Christian day of Resurrection (John 20:26)
10 completion; basis of many number systems (# digits on fingers/toes!)
11 incompletion; only eleven apostles remain after Judas’ death
12 months per year, tribes of Israel, apostles of Jesus; human completion
[13] [used in later superstition; based on Judas, but not used in Bible itself]
14 value of the name “David” in Hebrew gematria (a type of numerology popular in ancient Judaism)
obtained by summing the value of its three consonants (dalet=4, vav=6; thus D+V+D = 4+6+4)
24 Christian number for completion/restoration: OT tribes + NT apostles
30 days in month in ancient lunar calendars
40 very long time: years of Israel’s Exodus, days of Jesus’ temptation
42 number of months in 3½ years (half of seven years; see also 1260 days)
100 = 10x10
144 = 12x12, thus perfect completion
360 number of days in a lunar year
365 number of days in a solar year (cf. Gen 5:23)
666 number of the beast (Rev 13:18 only; variant reading is 616)
1000 = 10x10x10
1260 number of days in 3½ years (thus incompletion)
10,000 “myriad”; highest ancient number with its own name
Larger numbers in the Bible are often multiples of these basic numbers, thus combining their significance:

• 7000 = 7 x 1000; 12,000 = 12 x 1000; 20,000 = 2 x 10,000; 144,000 = 12 x 12,000
• “200 million” in Rev 9:16 is an English equivalent for 20,000 x 10,000; but there is no word in Hebrew or Greek for “million” or “billion”

God Bless you,

Patrick
 
Ok so here’s a question it took me almost 30 years and having to become Anglican to realize I had. And it’s one I’m still exploring because as a lay person it hadn’t ever really come up for obvious reasons… Why do Catholic priests sometimes celebrate mass on their own?

It had never even occurred to me that this would be unusual until last night when I was speaking with my church’s Dean about our church’s daily mass. The dean indicated that on occasion no one will come for the daily mass (they hold it at noon so given the workday that can sometimes prove a problematic time as you’d imagine for parishioners). And as a result they will only perform an ante-Eucharist service (ie: they won’t proceed into the Eucharistic portion of the mass) since they aren’t permitted to perform a full mass absent a second person to celebrate it with. This is not unlike the Orthodox position on the issue as I’m finding out as well. And if I’m not mistaken the scriptural basis is at least in part from Matthew 18.
AWESOME QUESTION!👍

Here’s why

[1] The Mass /the Eucharist {a term meaning to “give THANKS”} is the sum and the summit of our Catholic Faith because it is, IT IS< Jesus /God Himself being made present to us.

From our Catechism: #'s 1074; 1324; 1407

[2] The Mass /Eucharist is

** FROM ** God the Father

** OF** God the Son

** BY** God the Holy Spirit

[3] To be granted a Power; a Authority not even granted to the Angels is a GREAT thing.

Therefore Catholic Priest in THANKSGIVING are required to “OFFER” Mass daily.

It is strongly suggested that IF POSSIBLE that at least one person other than the priest be present {to also give thanks}; but this is NOT something that would release the priest from this Grace Moral obligation.

The ability to Say Mass and to actually beckon Jesus to come into OUR midst is so great of a gift that it MUST be daily acknowledged. Amen!

Thanks for asking,

Patrick
 
AWESOME QUESTION!👍

Here’s why

[1] The Mass /the Eucharist {a term meaning to “give THANKS”} is the sum and the summit of our Catholic Faith because it is, IT IS< Jesus /God Himself being made present to us.

From our Catechism: #'s 1074; 1324; 1407

[2] The Mass /Eucharist is

** FROM ** God the Father

** OF** God the Son

** BY** God the Holy Spirit

[3] To be granted a Power; a Authority not even granted to the Angels is a GREAT thing.

Therefore Catholic Priest in THANKSGIVING are required to “OFFER” Mass daily.

It is strongly suggested that IF POSSIBLE that at least one person other than the priest be present {to also give thanks}; but this is NOT something that would release the priest from this Grace Moral obligation.

The ability to Say Mass and to actually beckon Jesus to come into OUR midst is so great of a gift that it MUST be daily acknowledged. Amen!

Thanks for asking,

Patrick
Interesting, so they offer mass daily. Does this include some of them being a part of a mass offered by another priest or do they always have to be the one actually offering the mass personally?
 
Interesting, so they offer mass daily. Does this include some of them being a part of a mass offered by another priest or do they always have to be the one actually offering the mass personally?
You’re speaking of “Co-celebration” of the Mass and it counts.

t was a GREAT question, thanks,

God Bless you,

PJM
 
The only verses I did not comment on mentioned a debtor being tossed into prison. The problem with that the debtor is totally depending on someone else to pay his debt. This is more in line with the idea that Jesus paid the price and when we repent we are washes by the blood.Rev1:5
Sorry I haven’t been able to correspond to all these verses.

As for this passage, yes no one can actually “pay the debt of sin”. That why Jesus said, “until you change your hearts”. This is the purpose of Purgatory. That is, full remorse and contrition of sins. In this life, we act on this through faith (which is confession to the Lord and His Church whom He is one with). In the next life, it is different, because we will not see by faith, but the face of God!

This judgment of God on believers who have not turned from their sins (in a venal manner) is likened to a fire, prison, and a beating in Scripture.
 
This is more in line with the idea that Jesus paid the price and when we repent we are washes by the blood.Rev1:5
So, what about Christians who have NOT repented of sins after their Baptism, yet these sins did not lead to death, but only harm to themselves and the body?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top