D
distracted
Guest
I am a little unsure about how to answer…
hmmm…
:coffeeread:
.
.
hmmm…
.
.
I answered yes, but admit that my view of “born-again” is probably more similar to the Catholic one than the American evagelical one.I am a little unsure about how to answer…
hmmm…:coffeeread:
.
.
Ditto for meI answered yes, but admit that my view of “born-again” is probably more similar to the Catholic one than the American evagelical one.
I like what Feanor2 said - born again in Baptism, confession/Absolution, Communion.
Jon
Then I guess you could say all Christians are “born-again” Christians.No one Christian organization has the magic formula through which God must work.
Hmm…Then I guess you could say all Christians are “born-again” Christians.
And that is where the problem lies today.The term Christian. JW’s consider themselves Christians,but deny most of the core doctrines of orthodox Christianity.Hmm…
I guess so as long as your definition of Christian is not somebody who goes to a Christian church.
A true Christian by definition is someone who is regenerate (born again).
Yup. There is no standard definition of Christian.And that is where the problem lies today.The term Christian. JW’s consider themselves Christians,but deny most of the core doctrines of orthodox Christianity.
Actually - you’re wrong.Yes. One must be regenerate to enter the kingdom of heaven.
Jesus said this.
However, God is not limited as far as how He accomplishes this in an individual. No one Christian organization has the magic formula through which God must work.
And more so in today’s world where people tend to give different meanings and different difinitions to words.Yup. There is no standard definition of Christian.
Do you believe regeneration is accomplished through baptism, when we are joined to the body of Christ? Or at least that that is one way that we are regenerated?Hmm…
I guess so as long as your definition of Christian is not somebody who goes to a Christian church.
A true Christian by definition is someone who is regenerate (born again).
Actually - it is your opinion that I am wrong.Actually - you’re wrong.
There IS a formula, although not a magical one. It’s called Trinitarian Baptism (Matt. 28:19).
St. Paul uses the terms, “circumcision of the heart” and the* “circumcision of Christ*” (Romans 2:29, Col. 2:12-17) to describe the reality of circumcision being a spiritually inward act, not merely an outward sign. The Old Testament type that was circumcision is* now* baptism.
St. Peter tells us in 1 Peter 3:21: "Baptism . . . now saves you, not as a removal of dirt from the body but as an appeal to God for a clear conscience, through the resurrection of Jesus Christ."
Thank you for your courteous question.Do you believe regeneration is accomplished through baptism, when we are joined to the body of Christ? Or at least that that is one way that we are regenerated?
No, the fact is that you are wrong. It is not an opinion, it is a fact. We are born again through Trinitarian baptism, that is a fact!Actually - it is your opinion that I am wrong.
But thanks for your opinion anyway. I am certainly open to being corrected if the Lord Jesus Christ shows me I am wrong.
This is essentially what I was taught.There IS a formula, although not a magical one. It’s called Trinitarian Baptism (Matt. 28:19).
St. Paul uses the terms, “circumcision of the heart” and the* “circumcision of Christ*” (Romans 2:29, Col. 2:12-17) to describe the reality of circumcision being a spiritually inward act, not merely an outward sign. The Old Testament type that was circumcision is* now* baptism.
St. Peter tells us in 1 Peter 3:21: "Baptism . . . now saves you, not as a removal of dirt from the body but as an appeal to God for a clear conscience, through the resurrection of Jesus Christ."
And again, thank you for your opinion.No, the fact is that you are wrong. It is not an opinion, it is a fact. We are born again through Trinitarian baptism, that is a fact!