W
wheresjbob
Guest
My wife and I are catholic. I honestly don’t remember my confirmation name and have become much closer to God and my faith recently than when I was growing up. My son is getting confirmed this year. He was baptized with a first name and middle name that are both saints names (Nicholas Peter). He is now being asked to pick a confirmation name. However, our church is explaining something that makes a ton of sense, but not something my wife or I were ever told before.
The instructions to my son for picking a name state that if they were baptized with a saints name (and he was), that they have a special connection to that saint and should use THAT name as their confirmation name to strengthening the relationship between their baptism and their confirmation. To me, that makes complete sense because because when we are baptized, we cannot speak for ourselves and are also too young to know what’s going on. So, we have God parents to speak on our behalf. When we get old enough to understand what is being asked of us, we “confirm” what was said for us at our baptism and our belief and desire to be part of the church. Assuming I have this right, the explanation makes sense.
However, my wife is stuck on that because she believes that the confirmation name is supposed to be a different and additional name. Her’s is. “It’s always been that way” and something like “Nicholas Peter Nicholas” doesn’t make any sense.
Who is right?
The instructions to my son for picking a name state that if they were baptized with a saints name (and he was), that they have a special connection to that saint and should use THAT name as their confirmation name to strengthening the relationship between their baptism and their confirmation. To me, that makes complete sense because because when we are baptized, we cannot speak for ourselves and are also too young to know what’s going on. So, we have God parents to speak on our behalf. When we get old enough to understand what is being asked of us, we “confirm” what was said for us at our baptism and our belief and desire to be part of the church. Assuming I have this right, the explanation makes sense.
However, my wife is stuck on that because she believes that the confirmation name is supposed to be a different and additional name. Her’s is. “It’s always been that way” and something like “Nicholas Peter Nicholas” doesn’t make any sense.
Who is right?