I
Irishmom2
Guest
It would appear that your “research” shows that it doesnt seem to bother most of the people that responded. Perhaps you should make a poll. i bet your results would come out the same.
You are correct: it is not a stage. It is, instead, the ultimate reality. We do not habitually attend to it as easily or as well as we ought to, though, sometimes out of our own weakness and sometimes, I would guess, because we are actively tempted away from it by those spiritual forces that hate it the most and therefore are bold enough to make it their battlefield.The church is not a stage. I don’t know why people think it is.
No, I didn’t mean that. I mean do what you need to do as discretely as you reasonably can. After that, you just have to let it go. In the instance of the altar servers, they can’t be perfect all the time. They can learn to just go with the flow and let mistakes go past without making them into a bigger deal than they were. They aren’t on a stage, either, but they’re in a position to be less distracting or more distracting in how they cope with the unexpected.If a person is going to let themselves be distracted by something that petty, they are going to find something to be distracted by no matter what and it will always be someone else’s fault. They are wearing the wrong clothes, their hair is still damp from the shower, their kid is too squirmy, their aftershave is strong, their sweater has sparkles on it, they have a cough, they’re “manspreading” on the pew, they have a piece of lint on their pants, they let their kid have a graham cracker, their teenager’s hair is pink, the list goes on and on. There is no way that a person could possibly predict that something like making sure their blouse is down as they stand up could catch the attention of someone. How are normal people supposed to pay attention to the Mass, when they have to be constantly concerned over things like whether petty actions like checking their blouse as they stand up are distracting to abnormal people?
I already debunked that, I don’t obsess over it, I made this post after a conversation with my wife. I already stated numerous times it was a trifle topic, but somehow you want to go on misrepresenting what I actually think, do or see, and are not actually trying to understand what I am actually trying to say or my position. If I took the positions you claim I take, then I’d think it ridiculous too, have some compassion instead of being argumentative.Nice try. If you want to spend your time on earth obsessing over other people doing things like adjusting their clothes, you go right ahead.
Did I say scientific research? If you were paying attention, you would notice I said scientific thinking. By the way, your attempt at trying to do scientific research appears that you are just projecting your assumptions on me. I had no intention of doing either a proper qualitative or quantitative study, that would be ridiculous.“scientific research”
If you are referring to what I have been saying, you totally misrepresented my point. It would be abnormal if I was distracted by a person checking their blouse once or twice, but that is not what I was saying. Nice straw man though.How are normal people supposed to pay attention to the Mass, when they have to be constantly concerned over things like whether petty actions like checking their blouse as they stand up are distracting to abnormal people?
Perhaps I didn’t explain myself properly because many seem to misunderstand what I’m talking about. Anyhow, I’ve wasted enough time with this topic. God bless.It would appear that your “research” shows that it doesnt seem to bother most of the people that responded. Perhaps you should make a poll. i bet your results would come out the same.
So it isn’t my business, but my being distracted (regardless of the cause) is your business because it is a public forum? So things are only your business if someone talks about them? Or talks about them on an open forum? I don’t follow your logic.It is none of your business if other people adjust their clothes.
I didn’t choose to look at anyone, they were in my field of vision, there was no effort or volition on my part. I hope you get the distinction between passive seeing and active looking. Again, you keep on proving you don’t understand what I’ve been describing. If you’re going to bother to reply on this forum, at least try.It is not their fault that you chose to look at them.
Again, you assumed that I think everyone agrees that people think handling their clothes can be potentially distracting. I said some people did, but you are trying to prove a point so you trivialized what they said.I counted the number of responses to point out your error that other people agree that clothing adjustment is distracting
You continue to mock that I said “scientific thinking”, does that make you feel good? I didn’t say blouse adjustments count as a major distraction.So you are incorrect in your scientific thinking that people have agreed that blouse adjustments count as a major distraction. So, based on this limited sample size, yes, your response seems to be abnormal.
Most answers were either no or meh. I don’t think anyone acknowledged noticing “vigorous” clothes adjustments.When standing, people fixing / adjusting / pulling down / obsessing over the back of their shirt / dress. Sometimes I see this done vigorously and conspicuously. Do you see it often, and does it distract you?
This is a resounding no from those who responded to this thread.Is this just what appears to be a Catholic obsession, or do you see it a lot somewhere else?
Perhaps not completely, but decidedly in the minority according to those who responded to this thread.Am I completely alone in this trifle?
Right, no argument there, irrelevant to me though because I wasn’t continuing to pay attention, it just happened to be so constant me and my wife noticed after awhile.if you notice something, you have complete control of whether or not you decide to continue looking at it or paying attention to it.
I didn’t say it was the same thing as blouse adjustments, just that clothes adjustments can be distracting. Wow, if I had to count, this is like the 7th time you misrepresented my position.Not one single poster has said they thought blouse adjustments were distracting. So, you ARE in error on that front.
Yes, I was trying to think scientifically, do a little (nonserious) research for lack of a better term, and yes it was supposed to be a little fun. You thought I was belittling a woman for saying she was distracting by adjusting her blouse every minute. What is belittling about saying that? It was a statement of fact for me and my wife.You are the one who claims that you are trying to think “scientifically” and you are “doing research” and not venting. Now you say that you were just trying to have fun. I guess no one else thought your belittling of a woman you don’t know for having difficulty with her clothes was that funny. Sorry. Not sorry.