O
Ohana
Guest
Both/And. I was baptized as a Catholic, which is the same as Christian. Becoming more of a follower of Christ took some time and maturation.
What would you tell someone who asked your religion?Both/And. I was baptized as a Catholic, which is the same as Christian. Becoming more of a follower of Christ took some time and maturation.
Sure it is, and it is a ludicrous, polemical question, to boot.Please note, this is not a question of the definition of a Catholic or a Christian, or whether a Catholic is a Christian. Given that many Christians have a hatred of the Catholic Church my question is how do you choose to describe yourself, Catholic or Christian, in light of this anti-Catholic sentiment amongst many Christians. Cheers.
I agree.To be fully Christian is to be Catholic.
One follows another in whose mind? Like I said, you say that to a non-Catholic and they think you are not Christian.@True Light: remember this:
Protestantism is the works of Martin Luther (Lord, be merciful with his soul) and the Danish Kings Christian I and II. Denial, confiscation of land and properties and altering with the traditions. (they did a lot of damage to Norway from 1396-1814, the danes - the protestants).
That is why you will see and hear these kinds of things being said. We are catholics and catholics are christians from the very beginning. The one follows the other.
Yes, it was what i tried (but failed) to say.One follows another in whose mind? Like I said, you say that to a non-Catholic and they think you are not Christian.
Christians were dying in the lion pits before they were even called Catholics. We are both Catholic and Christian.
I’m sorry if I came across a little rough. I am just very surprised that that everyone does not see themselves as Christians first and foremost. The two are not interchangeable, as like it or not, there are other Christian people out there.Yes, it was what i tried (but failed) to say.
No one here claimed that the two terms are interchangeable; they said that being Catholic is the fulness of being Christian.I’m sorry if I came across a little rough. I am just very surprised that that everyone does not see themselves as Christians first and foremost. The two are not interchangeable, as like it or not, there are other Christian people out there.
In the OPs defense, the terms were introduced that way by the conversation, not to mention this thread, on which, there has also been a general misconception among the Catholic contributors that “Christian” means Protestant…No one here claimed that the two terms are interchangeable; they said that being Catholic is the fulness of being Christian.
The problem with the OP is that the question is framed in Protestant sectarian language. It is therefore a ludicrous question to ask a Catholic. It is like asking a man whom he loves more–his mother or his wife. The two are not mutually exclusive, nor does one outrank the other in a hierarchy. But that is what the question attempts to to do–establish a hierarchy, whereby Christian comes first and Catholic second. It is a “gotcha” question, designed to paint Catholics into a corner.
The corresponding term to Catholic is Protestant, but many Protestants of a contemporary evangelical background, don’t know this. They nothing little or nothing of history. Sometimes they came into their church-going selves in later years, so they have never studied the Reformation, etc. They are Protestant, but they don’t even know that they are, partially because evangelicals have distanced themselves from the mainline denominations, whom they see as too liberal. But their theology is entirely a synthesis of Protestant thinking. Consequently, they refer to themselves as Christians and us as Catholics.
Let’s say that Mr. Smith marries Miss Jones. She therefore becomes Mrs. Smith, but she will always be a member of the Jones family. Her family goes back for generations. The Smith children grow up and have children of their own, who themselves grow up. Mrs. Smith lives to see her grandchildren as adults, one of whom is a girl–she, coincidentally, marries a young man named Jones, who is a shirt-tail relative of Mrs. Smith’s family. After hearing of her husband’s family history, the new bride is very impressed, and when she visits her grandmother, tells her all about the Jones family. Her grandmother replies, “I know, dear! I have been a member of the Jones family for all of my life!” The girl forgets this because she was raised as a Smith and is not familiar with her own family’s history. But grandma, now being called Smith, did not stop being a Jones when she married a Smith.
That in itself is interesting.In the OPs defense, the terms were introduced that way on a previous thread, on which, there was a general misconception among the Catholic contributors that “Christian” meant Protestant…![]()
theres a re-edited version now, sorry.That in itself is interesting.
I totally get and agree with your analogy, but what do you think of Catholics who actually say, “I’m not Christian; I’m Catholic”?No one here claimed that the two terms are interchangeable; they said that being Catholic is the fulness of being Christian.
Let’s say that Mr. Smith marries Miss Jones…
I am christian, i am catholic, i am home and i am happy.