T
TK421
Guest
To me, it seems to be the case in history that major revolutions in thinking are the result of corruption within the orthodox side. I.E. There was enough corruption and political scandal within the Church that the emergence of Protestantism was all-but inevitable. If Luther or Calvin were never born, others would have taken their place. But, as painful as this event was, it was also what finally triggered a powerful Counter-Reformation in the Church. Shortly after the emergence of Protestantism we witness the birth of the Jesuits, and on the other side of the world, Our Lady of Guadalupe and a new unexpected stream of converts that need fed.
Likewise, condemning things such as homosexual unions, pornography ,or even polygamy seems all-but unsustainable when you already have so much moral laxity among the married/marrying population. It was corruption within the legitimate camp of marriage that allowed other innovations to push themselves into the mainstream. But likewise, this is an opportunity for the Church (and in this case, other groups) to “clean up” and “clarify” their views. I think this is already underway.
In other words, I don’t see the heavily pessimistic view that some people have when it comes to marriage and sexual ethics. If we are to truly believe that the Church “has it right” when it comes to sexual ethics, then that also means there are going to be real world consequences to disobeying her. The utopia that secular liberals dream of is not going to be realized, and therefore, you’re not going to simply have an entire population melt on an issue that - if nothing else - doesn’t seem to have any temporal reward. This is an ungallant reason, but it is a final defense to fall back on. I think this is especially true for a country like the United States. It’s too big and complex to have a blowout victory one way or another.
I believe the fruits of a false prophet can unwittingly help spread the Gospel, because it can compel some to flee.
Likewise, condemning things such as homosexual unions, pornography ,or even polygamy seems all-but unsustainable when you already have so much moral laxity among the married/marrying population. It was corruption within the legitimate camp of marriage that allowed other innovations to push themselves into the mainstream. But likewise, this is an opportunity for the Church (and in this case, other groups) to “clean up” and “clarify” their views. I think this is already underway.
In other words, I don’t see the heavily pessimistic view that some people have when it comes to marriage and sexual ethics. If we are to truly believe that the Church “has it right” when it comes to sexual ethics, then that also means there are going to be real world consequences to disobeying her. The utopia that secular liberals dream of is not going to be realized, and therefore, you’re not going to simply have an entire population melt on an issue that - if nothing else - doesn’t seem to have any temporal reward. This is an ungallant reason, but it is a final defense to fall back on. I think this is especially true for a country like the United States. It’s too big and complex to have a blowout victory one way or another.
I believe the fruits of a false prophet can unwittingly help spread the Gospel, because it can compel some to flee.