J
John_Higgins
Guest
How 'bout it? Is the ex-Augustinian priest in heaven or not? What do you think?
John
John
I would hope he is because Jesus died for him,but I have read a book on his life and he cursed Holy mother Church to the end, with pure hatred. I won’t speculate,but I wouldn’t want to be in his shoes and face Our Lord.God BlessI know he was in anguish over his decision, and he thought that the church was in human error. Perhaps there is forgiveness for that. He still worshiped God and Jesus Christ. Perhaps he is.
The Church does not presume to know who is in heaven (except the saints, whose heroic sanctity has been investigated and confirmed) and who is in hell, and neither should we.How 'bout it? Is the ex-Augustinian priest in heaven or not? What do you think? John
this is true. it’s hard to say the likes of St. Charles Boromeo, or St. Pius V, could of had the grace to become such outstanding saints if it was not for martin luther. of all of the reformers, i respect him the most. he lived a very pious life as a monk. i heard one story that when the precious blood was spilt, he licked it off the floor of the church. he was also very devoted to the Blessed Mother. he’s a complex guy. he also did a remarkable job in translating the bible into german (except the whole “faith alone” part). in the end though, he did say some vulgar things. he probably had a mental illness of some kind.I even refer to him as the “Blessed Reformer” from time to time. I grew up a Lutheran and I think the Reformation has actually been good for the Church.
Martin Luther approved the bigamous marriage of Philip of Hesse and sent Philip Melanchthon as his representative to witness it; said he could find no biblical grounds for opposing polygamy and therefore did not object to it; cut eleven (11) books from the canon of the Bible; invented Sola Fide and Sola Scriptura; hated the Jews so vehemently that he became a hero and model for the Nazis; fractured Christendom forever, and the list goes on and on. He was the first to label the Pope the antichrist and the Church the Whore of Babylon – or if not the first, he made these epithets the watchword of Protestantism.this is true. it’s hard to say the likes of St. Charles Boromeo, or St. Pius V, could of had the grace to become such outstanding saints if it was not for martin luther. of all of the reformers, i respect him the most. he lived a very pious life as a monk. i heard one story that when the precious blood was spilt, he licked it off the floor of the church. he was also very devoted to the Blessed Mother. he’s a complex guy. he also did a remarkable job in translating the bible into german (except the whole “faith alone” part). in the end though, he did say some vulgar things. he probably had a mental illness of some kind.
Hi C.M.,Good point about working out your salvation. Thats what we as christians should be concerned with an not with anyone elses.I’ve heard that about Luther being a saint too, but I don’t know unless you take it in the context that all who make it to heaven are saints. As to canonization: forget it The priest I heard that from was extremely liberal and I didn’t agree with a lot of stuff he did and said.
I’m still working out my own salvation…I don’t even presume to speak for Luther or anyone else..
A model of Catholic charity?Martin Luther approved the bigamous marriage of Philip of Hesse and sent Philip Melanchthon as his representative to witness it; said he could find no biblical grounds for opposing polygamy and therefore did not object to it; cut eleven (11) books from the canon of the Bible; invented Sola Fide and Sola Scriptura; hated the Jews so vehemently that he became a hero and model for the Nazis; fractured Christendom forever, and the list goes on and on. He was the first to label the Pope the antichrist and the Church the Whore of Babylon – or if not the first, he made these epithets the watchword of Protestantism.
Some hero!
My personal hope is that he will be in Purgatory until the end of time.
JMJ Jay
true, but if it wasn’t luther, someone else would have caused the reformation. wyclife and huss were protestant before luther. there was a lot of nationalistic feelings then which wanted to distance northern european countries from rome. the church was so corrupt that the priests in rome cursed during the mass and said blasphemous things like “bread it is and bread it remains”. don’t forget about the western schism when there were anti-popes in france. the church had was in poor shape (though there were some great saints like St. Teresa of avila and st. John of the cross… etc). luther pointed out legitimate errors although he did cross that line when he claimed the bible his sole authority. i think luther may have had good intentions intially, but he went crazy or was possesed towards the end of his life.cut eleven (11) books from the canon of the Bible; invented Sola Fide and Sola Scriptura; hated the Jews so vehemently that he became a hero and model for the Nazis; fractured Christendom forever, and the list goes on and on. He was the first to label the Pope the antichrist and the Church the Whore of Babylon
My statements about Luther are historical facts. If it’s “uncharitable” to say that the Japanese started WWII with the U.S. and Germany started it by its aggression in Europe, so be it. It happened as it happened. Is it uncharitable to tell the truth? Are we “charitable” if we pretend it never happened?A model of Catholic charity?
No doubt the Church need to be reformed – but Luther wasn’t a reformer, he was a destroyer. The Church reformed herself with the help of such saints as Francis of Assisi. I agree that Luther either went crazy or was possessed – but he and his ambitions fell into the hands of the German princes. His craziness is not an opinion shared by Protestants – he continues to be lionized as the Great Reformer who returned Christianity to “biblical purity” by standing up to the powerful, evil Church. Never mind that he desecrated the Bible.true, but if it wasn’t luther, someone else would have caused the reformation. wyclife and huss were protestant before luther. there was a lot of nationalistic feelings then which wanted to distance northern european countries from rome. the church was so corrupt that the priests in rome cursed during the mass and said blasphemous things like “bread it is and bread it remains”. don’t forget about the western schism when there were anti-popes in france. the church had was in poor shape (though there were some great saints like St. Teresa of avila and st. John of the cross… etc). luther pointed out legitimate errors although he did cross that line when he claimed the bible his sole authority. i think luther may have had good intentions intially, but he went crazy or was possesed towards the end of his life.