Do you wear jeans to Mass?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Damascus
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
A large part of the world would love to have a nice pair of jeans to wear to Mass. Some places would like to just have a Mass. My Priest just got back from Peru and they have a circuit priest. They have Mass once every three months. I got back from the Philippines and some parts are so poor they would love to have electricity. So jeans don’t bother me. Rich snobs do.
Pretty assumptive of you to think all snobs (your term, not mine) are rich. Perhaps they are not snobs at all but people who have been brought up differently than you. Your Sunday best does not have to be designer clothes.
 
Pretty assumptive of you to think all snobs (your term, not mine) are rich. Perhaps they are not snobs at all but people who have been brought up differently than you. Your Sunday best does not have to be designer clothes.
I have been with this thread from day 1. I have never considered this about wearing your sunday best or sunday worse. It started with just jeans and has warped into something else.

I have considered this basically a thread about wearing something a little nicer than blue jeans (if you can afford it) which are, for all intents and purposes, considered “work” clothes.
 
:rolleyes: Way to assume. I go to a FILIPINO parish - but thanks for the spelling lesson.
I always get a chuckle out of the nice person who will mistakenly proclaim, “A reading from the letter of Paul to the Fillipinos!”
 
I agree 100% with you. Thats why i have no problem with Jeans or people who wear them to Church. The last thing i want to do to my kids is make them play the Sunday finest fashion show game that a lot of church go-ers play and take away for the true reason we’re there. Christ.
If someone wants to wear a tuxedo to Mass, thats dandy. If someone wears shorts, thats dandy. neither is more Holy than the other.
So, I used to make a big deal out of “dressing up” for Sunday Mass. Now, given, for me that means “business casual”, at best, as that is about as dressy as I respectably get (everything more that that is mere costume fashion, as far as I’m concerned). Then I realized a few things.

For one, if I wore a dress shirt in the summer to some of these churches, I was going to sweat and stiik to the pew. It’s better to dress more comfortably and pray without such worries.

For another, I realized that I was so concerned about “getting dressed” that I probably paid more attention to it (and spent more time - which wasn’t much, but enough - concerning myself with such things) that I wasn’t as concerned about my prayer life as I was about “dressing up for God”. For goodness sake, probably no one even saw that I was wearing a dress shirt (except God) most of the year, when I was wearing a coat.

Then, there was the “running late to get dressed” thing. I think one time, I was even seriously late for Mass, partially due to the fact that I HAD to go pick up a clean, pressed shirt from the cleaners, first. Goodness gracious!

My intention was well and good when I was so pent up about all this. But now I just dress however I can and feel up to (sometimes that’s dressier, sometimes more casual) without worrying about all that, and get to Mass so I can give myself over to God. It’s made me a lot freer to worship the Lord in spirit and truth. I think He is much more pleased with that sort of expression than he would be fretting about my choice of shirt or shoes at service.
 
That is the essence of this debate - how do I choose to dress? Do I choose to dress my best for Jesus, or not? Or do I make excuses for dressing down?
It is the essence of the discussion. Clearly the latter part of this post seems to be the reality for this discussion.
 
It is the essence of the discussion. Clearly the latter part of this post seems to be the reality for this discussion.
i completely disagree with you. not only is that not the essence of the discussion. it’s a mere sidenote to the larger problem this thread is addressing.
namely, why certain ways of dress are preconceived to be better than others. Where are the fashion police pronouncements that states Church worship in anyway relates to Jeans or Slacks. Interior posture matters. exterior is neither worthy of notice nor praise.

it is personal preference. it is mere fashion. it means nothing. It’s gravity is only given to it by the concern of the onlooker.
 
So, I used to make a big deal out of “dressing up” for Sunday Mass. Now, given, for me that means “business casual”, at best, as that is about as dressy as I respectably get (everything more that that is mere costume fashion, as far as I’m concerned). Then I realized a few things.

For one, if I wore a dress shirt in the summer to some of these churches, I was going to sweat and stiik to the pew. It’s better to dress more comfortably and pray without such worries.

For another, I realized that I was so concerned about “getting dressed” that I probably paid more attention to it (and spent more time - which wasn’t much, but enough - concerning myself with such things) that I wasn’t as concerned about my prayer life as I was about “dressing up for God”. For goodness sake, probably no one even saw that I was wearing a dress shirt (except God) most of the year, when I was wearing a coat.

Then, there was the “running late to get dressed” thing. I think one time, I was even seriously late for Mass, partially due to the fact that I HAD to go pick up a clean, pressed shirt from the cleaners, first. Goodness gracious!

My intention was well and good when I was so pent up about all this. But now I just dress however I can and feel up to (sometimes that’s dressier, sometimes more casual) without worrying about all that, and get to Mass so I can give myself over to God. It’s made me a lot freer to worship the Lord in spirit and truth. I think He is much more pleased with that sort of expression than he would be fretting about my choice of shirt or shoes at service.
It is interesting that your reasons for dressing casually involve how much they are an inconvienience to your time and comfort. I think a large part of dressing up on sundays, is the result of an awareness that sunday is a very different day than the rest of the week. (You should hear Scott Hahn speak on this, it is brilliant). No one is asking people in here to be vain in their appearnce or disposition. I think those who are advocating for more formal dress at church, do so based on the principal, of sacrifice, and example setting. This is also based on the premise of, keep holy the sabbath, or hallow it.
40.png
Chicago:
It’s better to dress more comfortably and pray without such worries
Why not offer that discomfort up for God?

That was the motive for people like John the Baptist, who wore a hair shirt as a penance, I am not saying that you need o wear a hair shirt. The principal however remains the same. Are you unwilling to offer a bit of discomfort up for God?

I so often hear people comment on how Jehovahs Witness and Mormons dress up for their ministry, and how edifying that is to their faith…I agree. They can wear a tie and some nice slacks and a nice shirt, and be willing to ride their bike all over creation…It’s beautiful. They do not even have the fullness of the faith or of truth. We on the other hand have te fullness of truth, how much more should we be setting an example like they do, why can’t we be willing to be edifying towards other people and inspire the same sense of devotion, not for vain glory of course.

We have become so laxed, and forgetful about others and worried about ourselves. We get this attitude like, “we know whats up, so we don’t need all that other stuff, we have the truth.” And those who do dress up, are accused of being “rich snobs” when in fact most of those who do dress up are some of the poorest and underpriveliged people.

We justify our laziness and our laxed attitude with such comments as, “well, God knows my heart” “we are not there for that.” I think if ALL you have are jeans, then, obviously theres no objection, and you should not have to feel bad. I highly doubt that the majority of Americans who attend Sunday mass, can only afford jeans and t-shirts. That is just a case of grievous over-generalization.

C’mon people why can we not admit that we are just to darn lazy on Sunday to “worry” about that. If you are dirt poor and have nothing else we all know that that is fine. The real objection lies in the snobbery of those who CAN dress up and CAN afford too, but just don’t want to inconenience themselves. At least for those who do not have that privledge and have that desire to dress up for the good Lord, at least be grateful you can.
 
I am a Levi’s and T-Shirt kind of guy so yes, I wear jeans to mass. Definatly not torn or worn out jeans and my t-shirt is same, usually a single color no print pocket T.

If I was to dress differently, that is not being me, that is not who I am. My first meeting and date with this wonderful woman I am seeing, I wore the same thing, and she loved me for it. Not trying to make first impressions a false impression. Our Lord knows who I am and I know He is happy that I am there regardless of what I am wearing.

But I am of the mind, as long as what is worn is tasteful, not distracting or blatently innapropriate, wear what you want.
 
I used to be a Presyterian before converting to the traditional Catholic faith and one of the things that I really objected to was the way the church goers all got dressed up in their finery as if they were trying to outdo each other in the fashion stakes.

So when I first started to go to mass as a student in curiosity, I was impressed by the fact that people attending mass were not there trying to be fashion plates - not that it was as such a particular factor in my eventually converting. But at least it said one important thing to me, namely that it didn’t matter how much you earned or dressed up, what was important that before Christ at the holy sacrifice of the mass all who assisted at mass are equal in His sight regardless of their status or wealth. That really did impress me. I primarily attend the traditional latin mass and dress reasonably conservatively - though usually not in a suit, but I never feel awkward if someone assisting at mass is dressed in jeans or fairly casual attire as generally they seem as intent as I am to engage as fully as I or anyone else in the mystery of the faith.
 
It is interesting that your reasons for dressing casually involve how much they are an inconvienience to your time and comfort.
The crux of the matter to me is what will enable me to reasonably pray well. If I’m sticking to the pew, I’m worried more about my wet back than offering myself to God. If it’s a matter of missing my bus and getting to Mass late or wearing the shoes I have on, I may wear whatever I’m wearing. If I have to walk a couple of miles between getting to/from Church and any other errands I have to run, I’ll change into good walking shoes. If it’s cold out and there’s a foot and a half of snow on the ground that I may have to climb through, I’ll be warmer wearing sweat pants and drier wearing an old pair of gym shoes that I don’t have to worry about ruining. And I’ll pray better because of it. I think the Lord is fine with all of this, even if you aren’t. In fact, if it scandalizes you, GOOD! Maybe it will get you to think a little outside the box and recognize other realities. Afterall, appearances alone can be deceiving.
I think a large part of dressing up on sundays, is the result of an awareness that sunday is a very different day than the rest of the week. (You should hear Scott Hahn speak on this, it is brilliant).
I will agree that in our present culture, “Sunday” has taken on a much different perspective than it once had. I’ll further agree that this isn’t a good thing. Nonetheless, we have to live in the times that we do, not just the times we’d like to live in. If that means that people are approaching with alternative legitimate perspectives, then you take them where they are and uplift that which is good in what they have come to the altar of the Lord with.
No one is asking people in here to be vain in their appearnce or disposition. I think those who are advocating for more formal dress at church, do so based on the principal, of sacrifice, and example setting. This is also based on the premise of, keep holy the sabbath, or hallow it.
This is based upon your perspective of what more formal dress means. Not everyone views it the same way. For instance, some people find a three piece suit to be essential presentation as business wear. To me, it’s just stuffy and unnecessary, sometimes a sign of puffery, even. But, hey, if you like it and it looks sharp then go for it! There is a certain subjectiveness at play, though, in how everyone views clothing. For some people, it is more critical than it is to others.

As far as “example setting”, I believe that we can do this in other ways. For example, a young family I know sets a great example in the faith in so many ways, even though they aren’t always dressed to the nines for Sunday Mass. Their children are certainly some of the better Catholics I know, whether in T Shirts or fancy dresses. And, certainly, the “hallow” the day.
Why not offer that discomfort up for God?
While offering up discomfort is a good thing, I think it is petulant to suggest that God is calling us to be penitential in this way if distraction in prayer can be easily resolved by reasonable means. What does he want more, your undivided heart or nice clothes? Think about it!
That was the motive for people like John the Baptist, who wore a hair shirt as a penance, I am not saying that you need o wear a hair shirt. The principal however remains the same. Are you unwilling to offer a bit of discomfort up for God?
I thought we were talking about Sunday Mass, not Friday Pennance!
I so often hear people comment on how Jehovahs Witness and Mormons dress up for their ministry, and how edifying that is to their faith…I agree. They can wear a tie and some nice slacks and a nice shirt, and be willing to ride their bike all over creation…It’s beautiful. They do not even have the fullness of the faith or of truth. We on the other hand have te fullness of truth, how much more should we be setting an example like they do, why can’t we be willing to be edifying towards other people and inspire the same sense of devotion, not for vain glory of course.
If it helps, fine. But it isn’t required, either. Of course, I can often find Christ in the dirty begger better than the well groomed professional all too often. So it goes both ways.
We have become so laxed, and forgetful about others and worried about ourselves.
You said it! Why worry about how others dress, then?
 
We get this attitude like, “we know whats up, so we don’t need all that other stuff, we have the truth.” And those who do dress up, are accused of being “rich snobs” when in fact most of those who do dress up are some of the poorest and underpriveliged people.
True enough. But I don’t think anyone is necessarily accusing people who “dress up” of anything wrong (let alone saying that they shouldn’t get gussied), but rather suggesting that those who worry and complain about such things to no end are often not the same “poor and underpriveleged” but possibly those to whom “nice clothes” mean something signifigant due to their social status and ability to dress a certain way. It really is a form of snobbery to suggest that you “must” do as I desire and conform to be “like me”.
We justify our laziness and our laxed attitude…
Again, you’re making a judgement here about people’s attitudes which may not be accurate. It’s only “laziness and lax” because of your preferred perspective which says it must be. Try seeing some value in other perspectives, also.
… with such comments as, “well, God knows my heart” “we are not there for that.” I think if ALL you have are jeans, then, obviously theres no objection, and you should not have to feel bad. I highly doubt that the majority of Americans who attend Sunday mass, can only afford jeans and t-shirts. That is just a case of grievous over-generalization.

C’mon people why can we not admit that we are just to darn lazy on Sunday to “worry” about that. If you are dirt poor and have nothing else we all know that that is fine. The real objection lies in the snobbery of those who CAN dress up and CAN afford too, but just don’t want to inconenience themselves. At least for those who do not have that privledge and have that desire to dress up for the good Lord, at least be grateful you can.
Alright, I’m going to attempt an argument here that you won’t like, but which plays right at your own concerns about Sunday being unique. Maybe these people are so pent up from the “need” to conform, perform, and “dress everything up” during the rest of the week that on Sunday they just want to comfortably “rest in the Lord” and be real. If their jeans and whatever else allow them to do this, what’s the problem?
 
i completely disagree with you. not only is that not the essence of the discussion. it’s a mere sidenote to the larger problem this thread is addressing.
namely, why certain ways of dress are preconceived to be better than others. Where are the fashion police pronouncements that states Church worship in anyway relates to Jeans or Slacks. Interior posture matters. exterior is neither worthy of notice nor praise.

it is personal preference. it is mere fashion. it means nothing. It’s gravity is only given to it by the concern of the onlooker.
olamshrine.com/olam/shrine_info.htm
look at the bottom of the page

It appears, that Mother Angelica does not share this view. Even at the Vatican you cannot enter the Basillica of St Peter, dressed in the same manner with this same attitude
it is personal preference. it is mere fashion. it means nothing. It’s gravity is only given to it by the concern of the onlooker.
In humility you should not over generalize this topic. What are we seeing with Mother Angelica and th Vatican is that there IS indeed a standard, you are free to disagree, however you may not be let into St Peters or The Shrine down in Alabama.THERE ARE STANDARDS!

Matthew 22: 2-14 - I am not saying this is a treatise on how to dress at mass or at a wedding, but their is an underlined reality. In this parable which Jesus speaks about, he uses the wedding feast example. Now notice how he draws his parables from realities, and that this was a reality in the Hebrew culture. This idea of dressing for the proper occasion. I think it bears some contemplation and some consideration.
 
In humility you should not over generalize this topic. What are we seeing with Mother Angelica and th Vatican is that there IS indeed a standard, you are free to disagree, however you may not be let into St Peters or The Shrine down in Alabama.THERE ARE STANDARDS!
Standards which THEY are choosing to set (and perhaps not without good reason, particularly in the Vatican). But that doesn’t mean that these standards are set in stone as the only reasonable possibility. I mean, we’re not talking about strict moral dogma here, but decorum. And, from what I understand, those skirts that they hand out at the Vatican sometimes can be paper thin and not really worth bothering much with in the long run, anyway.
Matthew 22: 2-14 - I am not saying this is a treatise on how to dress at mass or at a wedding, but their is an underlined reality. In this parable which Jesus speaks about, he uses the wedding feast example. Now notice how he draws his parables from realities, and that this was a reality in the Hebrew culture. This idea of dressing for the proper occasion. I think it bears some contemplation and some consideration.
He’s talking about the state of one’s soul and an environment where the garments were provided. It’s not mere clothing that he’s speaking of, but what’s on the inside. Be careful not to get Pharasitical about such exterior practices, then. Actually, if you really wanted to go this route, you would suggest that we should all be wearing albs at Mass, provided by the parish.
 
Jeans? Ah! No. I don’t even have one… I just don’t feel comfortable on jeans;)
 
Just curious, please no bashing anyone if they do or dont, I just want to know if

A) you do it on a regular basis
B) only have done it in emergency or less than 3 times a year
C)Have never done it
D) Have never done it and get hopping mad when you see it
E) I cant remember and I dont go to Mass often enough to notice

Just pick one of the above.
Mine is A. One of the reason is because it’s a normal dresscode here. However, as much as I can, I try to wear something decent, clean and also simple. I want people to be comfortable to approach me or when I approach them (I’m in the youth ministry and also Legion of Mary). I do wear slippers recently, simply because the condition of my slippers is better than my shoes. I admit, I’m kinda guilty for not getting a new pair of shoes yet. It is something that’s normal in my church. I think it really depends on the parishioners and how they dress.

I have suit in my wardrobe, but I only wear it once or twice a year, if I have presentation in school. 😛
And I’ll stand out if I wear long sleeve shirt to mass, because usually only wardens wear it.
 
The crux of the matter to me is what will enable me to reasonably pray well. If I’m sticking to the pew, I’m worried more about my wet back than offering myself to God. If it’s a matter of missing my bus and getting to Mass late or wearing the shoes I have on, I may wear whatever I’m wearing. If I have to walk a couple of miles between getting to/from Church and any other errands I have to run, I’ll change into good walking shoes. If it’s cold out and there’s a foot and a half of snow on the ground that I may have to climb through, I’ll be warmer wearing sweat pants and drier wearing an old pair of gym shoes that I don’t have to worry about ruining. And I’ll pray better because of it. I think the Lord is fine with all of this, even if you aren’t. In fact, if it scandalizes you, GOOD! Maybe it will get you to think a little outside the box and recognize other realities. Afterall, appearances alone can be deceiving.
In humility, you again radically misreperesent my postion. You have taken the rare and unique cases, and made them the norm and the rule of thumb for this topic, you continually draw false dichotomies. Aside from the ad hominum remarks, I do indeed think and conider “outside the box” the reality is, not every one HAS to trudge through “a foot and a half of snow” not everyone shares your unique circumstances. I am aware of other peoples mitigating circumstances. I am not asking a poor beggar to come to church dressed up the best, because in reality he cannot, and the fact he makes it to church is a blessing…inevitably the refute for this statement will be “a’ha you see the fact that he comes to church is the real blessing, therefore you are out of line to ask others dress properly” to this i say yes it I agree it is a blessing…but are all people not able to afford dress clothes?..No not everyone shares this man’s circumstance.
This is based upon your perspective of what more formal dress means. Not everyone views it the same way. For instance, some people find a three piece suit to be essential presentation as business wear. To me, it’s just stuffy and unnecessary, sometimes a sign of puffery, even. But, hey, if you like it and it looks sharp then go for it! There is a certain subjectiveness at play, though, in how everyone views clothing. For some people, it is more critical than it is to others.
No… it is based on the principal that, Sunday is a day set aside and is to be hallowed, (before you misrepresent my statement read further) it is a day set aside and is asking us for that awareness, if you tell yourself it is not necessary that you dress out of the ordinary like you would dress ordinarily through out the week. Then that is a failing in one respect to treating the day differently. That is to say you are not willing to treat sunday differently in respects to you exterior disposition. You justify it by drawing this flase dichotomy like so man often do in regards to interior and exterior dispostions. They are complimentary.
 
As far as “example setting”, I believe that we can do this in other ways. For example, a young family I know sets a great example in the faith in so many ways, even though they aren’t always dressed to the nines for Sunday Mass. Their children are certainly some of the better Catholics I know, whether in T Shirts or fancy dresses. And, certainly, the “hallow” the day.
And yet you are not willing to say that it is good and just to hallow the day throguh our appearance. Yet you refute this statement through the implication that somehow I have made it an end unto itself. Your all for example setting until it comes to setting an example through your attire, writing it of as a relative issue, as superficial. If I have drawn the wrong conlcusion form this statement, please correct me.
While offering up discomfort is a good thing, I think it is petulant to suggest that God is calling us to be penitential in this way if distraction in prayer can be easily resolved by reasonable means. What does he want more, your undivided heart or nice clothes? Think about it!
Why should I think about it? I agree wholeheartedly with this point, I do not disagree that God wants our “undivided” heart. Thats not what is being called into question. You have also implied that those who are dressed nicely are not concerned with giving their undivided heart.
If it helps, fine. But it isn’t required, either. Of course, I can often find Christ in the dirty begger better than the well groomed professional all too often. So it goes both ways.
You continually use the “dirty beggar” as an escape goat for the fully capable individual who *CAN *dress nicely, but decides that it is too “out of the way” I agree as well that you can find a dirty beggar with more faith than one who is dressed nicely. It can also be argued that a man who is dressed nicely has more faith and more conviction than that of a dirty beggar. Is this to say then that all poor beggars have more faith than a nicely dressed individuals? Or shall we say all nicely dressed individuals are “rich snobs” stuffy and cold? Should I assert that all nicely dressed individuals are completely and properly disposed interiorly? Certainly not!! to say that these circmustances are the norm and are true realities, is to commit the fallacy of hasty generalization.
…I think the Lord is fine with all of this, even if you aren’t. In fact, if it scandalizes you, GOOD! Maybe it will get you to think a little outside the box and recognize other realities…
(Pardon me if I find this somewhat, problematic, rigid and thoughtless. Before you accuse me of being ignorant, and wish to scandalize people, understand their postion. Don’t result to personal strikes.) I am sure people on this thread want avoid such actions so as to be able to continue this discussion.

Conclusivley, that my position may be properly and clearly understood I will say that, those who are capable, who have the means, should dress approprietly for Mass, should exercise that privledge and act of respect. To not do so (mitigating circumstances aside) would be a snobbish and ungrateful attitude.

Those, due to mitigating circumstances, who cannot and do not have the means to dress in a manner that is conventionally known as “nice” should not be hindered, or be made to feel less because of it!!!

Please, before respondning to this post, understand my position and do not misrepresent what I have stated above as my view and position*

Humbly, In Christ
 
i completely disagree with you. not only is that not the essence of the discussion. it’s a mere sidenote to the larger problem this thread is addressing.
namely, why certain ways of dress are preconceived to be better than others.
Where are the fashion police pronouncements that states Church worship in anyway relates to Jeans or Slacks. Interior posture matters. exterior is neither worthy of notice nor praise.
Oh, I think the law enforcement people are at another thread right now. I think that thread is called “mass no no’s”. I believe this thread should be linked to that thread because it all sound the same. All people judging other people, whether it is their dress or their kids being unruly.
 
Oh, I think the law enforcement people are at another thread right now. I think that thread is called “mass no no’s”. I believe this thread should be linked to that thread because it all sound the same. All people judging other people, whether it is their dress or their kids being unruly.
Agreed
who are we to Judge?
 
Oh, I think the law enforcement people are at another thread right now. I think that thread is called “mass no no’s”. I believe this thread should be linked to that thread because it all sound the same.
Big difference – this thread, at least, is still civil. 😃 😃
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top