Oh really, I don’t ever recall saying that. It is very wrong of you to attribute or make a judgement regarding my actions when you do not know my actions nor what motivates them. And just so you know, I did read through those documents as well. But when it comes to choosing between Wikipedia or the Magisterium of the Catholic Church, by God’s grace I will choose the Magisterium of the Church, with Church Tradition, and Sacred Scriptures, and not some modern exegetes who wish to say that everything is a literary device.
The day that the Magisterium of the Catholic Church starts using Wikipedia documents as their source documents, I will be more than happy to give Wikipedia credibility then in matters of Faith and Morals. Why turn to Wikipedia when you can turn to the Magisterium of the Catholic Church.
I noticed that Humani Generis was quoted earlier, are you throwing that document out, seeing that it does not agree with your “literary device” theory?
And what a surprise to see this thread, and I just thought on the off-side to see if you were in this thread and lo and behold you were. And the discussion is continuing, albeit in another thread.
And because this thread has to do with what I was saying in the other thread, I am posting the relevant points.
From the Catechism of the Catholic Church which Blessed Pope John Paul II said 'It is a sure norm for teaching the Catholic faith."
250 - Council of Trent [1546]: DS 1511
251 - Cf. LG 2
And I have a question for you Pfaffenhoffen, did you see Buffalo’s post. Those my friend are dogmas of the Catholic Church. They are truth. How can a “literary device” transmit orginal sin down to all humans? If Adam is only a “literary device” what need do we have of Christ?
God bless.
The problem is not about the thread, it is about you.
You are a lady, probably and Pretty and Gentle Lady and I always was unlucky with women. I do not understand them and they do not understand me. I have got 2 sisters, my father had 4 sisters, my mother 6 sisters. It was not that I did not had contact with women, but they drive me crazy.
With you it was the same thing: I say one thing, you understand another, you say something, you do not answer to the point and when I answer you tell that I do not understand you, a mess. I get exhausted, so I surrender.
I know that women must have some kind of logic and I envy those men who ar good at understanding them but … unfortunately … that is not my case …
But, lets try again.
How did you know the Lady I was talking was you? Of course it was you! But it could not be you !!! 6th Sense?
There you come again. You did not say 3 lines without speaking about the Magisterium. If I continue this exchange with you I am going to count the times you repeat the word. This time it was 4 times. If Magisterium says it all, close CAF and study the Magisterium !!!
Wikipedia is an excelent source for beginners. You see, that is why it is so tiring!!, did I say anyhting so exagerated as this:
The day that the Magisterium of the Catholic Church starts using Wikipedia documents as their source documents,
I have to answer to things I did not say ! Do you realize what you are saying, that the Pope is reading the wikipedia to know what His Teaching will be? How can a discussion go on with this sentence?
Yes I replied to Buffalo.
Yes, Adam and Eve are literary devices and The Father sent His Son, Jesus Christ to redeem us from all our sins. He wiped away all our sins, in the Cross he died and resurrected so that through baptism, confession, Eucharist and good deeds we maybe worthy, through His Blood, and through the merits of Him, as son of God, to be with Him and the Father and the Holy spirit, with all our Fellow Brothers, with the Holy Trinity for trillions of trillions or years, for all Eternity.
As you see, sound Catholic Church Teaching and I do not need a real Adam and Eve.
Yes, I utterly need Jesus Christ. Adam and Eve real are dispensable. Jesus Christ not.