O
otjm
Guest
“In theory, theory and practice are the same. In practice, they are not.” Yogi Berra.Well if we are going to get technical, baptized Christians MIGHT go through RCIA. The Rite of Welcoming, the Rite of Sending, and the Rite of Calling to Continuing Conversion are specifically for candidates for full initiation.
The bigger question is, SHOULD baptized Christians be in RCIA? The growing opinion seems to be that most should not unless they have had absolutely no Christian upbringing.
Now in many dioceses and/or parishes the catechumens, candidates for full initiation, and sometimes adult Catholics seeking Confirmation are in the same faith formations classes and go through combined rites. But a lot of parishes are beginning to make a distinction between those who have been baptized and those who have not. Obviously both the baptized and unbaptized need Faith Formation but the “initiation” part is VERY different for the two groups.
My parish used to receive candidates for full initiation at the Easter Vigil but we stopped doing that a full years ago and now receive them when they are ready.
The quote may be upside down, but there are theorists, and then there is out here in the hinterlands where the rubber actually meets the road.
In a large parish, with a large number of people entering the Church, both unbaptized and Protestant (baptized), it may be that there are sufficent resources to spearate into two, three or more groups. I had heard the comment quite some time ago that there should be tow separate groups, and while I can understand the theoretical underpinnings, from a real world practical aspect, I am not at all sure I agree.
Everyone - with the possible exception of someone who has been living under a rock - has some conceptions of God, church, and etc. Much of that if not most of it may be to one degree or another, distorted. And there can be much to be gained by all seeking conversion, to hear others questions and get straight answers.
I have worked in RCIA for the most part of 20 years, and can remember one particular class in which we had two women, both from evangelical backgrounds. The questions went off like popcorn. I have no doubt there were questions broached which some of the others had never hear to that point - but were likely to confront some time in the future. i think all were blessed by those two.
There are certain parts which only pertain to the unbaptized; but it is not like the others need to be excluded. At the beginning, we explain what is coming, including the observation that some are farther along in their faith walk than others; and our goal is to assist them along the way. In all that time, I have not found it problematic having both groups together.