Again based ONLY on the situation I am familiar with (see my previous response), the new Bishop who had our friend removed from the priesthood was asked by some hotshot reporter if he thought his predecessor (now deceased) was “covering up” this priest’s infidelity to his vows. The Bishop explained that the procedures dictated by the Vatican and the USCCB were more strict than they had when his predecessor was in office.
The question was reported in the paper. His response was not.
That of course does not explain why priests were moved around instead of taken out. I once had a wise priest, who I consider the closest thing to a saint that I have had the pleasure of knowing, tell me that the Church is both Divine and Human.
If we consider only the Divinity of the Church, we will be disappointed by all the misdeeds of the people in the Church, secular and religious, and declare that the Church can’t possibly therefore be divine.
If we consider only the humanity of the Church, we are are confused when she displays characteristics of divinity. And because we can’t explain characteristics like saints, longevity of the Church, the good done by its members who go largely unknown, etc. we will ignore them as anomalies, rumors or legends.
Either way, we make the same mistake that the Jews made when considering Jesus as either man or divine, but not both human and divine. “How can anything good come from Galilee” and “If you are the son of God, command you angels to come down to save you.”
There are many more instances of paradoxes of Christ, and you need only look at the history of the Church to see her paradoxes.
I think we are called to accept the premise that both Christ and the Church He founded have both aspects of Divinity and humanity.
Humans make mistakes. Adam and Eve did. Why should we say that we have overcome the human characteristic of doing things wrong?
Stay blest this coming New Year.
b Gorski