Does anyone ever know what they are doing when they sin?

  • Thread starter Thread starter OneSheep
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Ignorance, weakness, vice, and slavery to sin are no excuse for these realities. If they are held as the ground for our redemption, we cannot possibly be loving God.
The grounds for our redemption lie in the fact that God loves us completely, and His mercy knows no limit. In addition, His creation (people) below the surface truly want to be united with God. Ignorance, weakness, vice, and slavery to sin all come from lack of awareness. Our love is hindered by these, but not our intent to love.

We can find good intent even in the person who chooses an abortion, correct? What was your mind’s good intent?
 
Opps, your wrong:open_mouth:

Sin is SIN precisely and ONLY because we DO know what we are doing.
Gen 1:26-27 teaches that humanity ALONE is in His Very IMAGE for a precise reason; Isaiah 43 & & 21

At Conception GOD GIFTS every human SOUL with a mind, intellect and freewill PRECISELY so that we CAN know good from evil, and choose which of the two WE WANT, and then commits Himself to OFFER “sufficient grace” that all HUMANITY can Know God and What God commands IF they search with humility.

That friend is why heaven, hell and purgatory exist

God bless and guide you,
Patrick
 
At Conception GOD GIFTS every human SOUL with a mind, intellect and freewill PRECISELY so that we CAN know good from evil
Yes, but becoming aware of what the conscience holds is a life-long process. And even then, people are subject to blindness. We aren’t born aware of every option in terms of behavior. Five year olds hurt other children, and then learn from the consequences. Empathy plays a huge role in this. The five year old, before hurting the other child and experiencing the other child being hurt, has a very limited scope on how to behave.
Gen 1:26-27 teaches that humanity ALONE is in His Very IMAGE for a precise reason; Isaiah 43 & & 21
You aren’t saying that people are omniscient, right? I don’t see how my observation, based on Luke 23:34, is the least bit contradicted by those verses and chapters. Perhaps you are reading something into my words?

Jesus made the observation that people did not know what they were doing when they were sinning against Him.
That friend is why heaven, hell and purgatory exist
Not sure what the “that” refers to. I’m not trying to be the least bit “smart” here, I am far from high intellect. There is an introspective approach here, a spiritual approach, and it sort of transcends all the judgment.
God bless and guide you,

Patrick
Thanks, I appreciate that. Blessings to you!
 
God;s mercy is illimitable, but he condescends, and so his mercy cannot be effective against our own will.
We “tie” God’s hands in our own salvation.

It’s not true that ignorance and sin come from lack of awareness. These things are worked at, they are practiced.
Virtue is the practice of the particular thing. Vice, sin, ignorance, are anti-virtues, they are well practiced by most of us, and so become ingrained in us. They become epidemic in us. Evil does not just appear out of thin air because we didn’t know about “such and such”.

When Christ asks “Father forgive them, they know not what they do” he is not asking for a free pass due to their ignorance of his divinity. He is not granting them on the spot absolution either.
Is it fair to say that Christ is praying for them? I think it is.
 
Last edited:
The thing is, I wasn’t thinking either of those things. I knew the effects it would have on my soul and I knew that it was a big deal.
Did that motivate you to go to confession ASAP, as in immediately?.
 
Last edited:
If I could go to confession, I would. I wanted to go to confession, aside from the numb feeling I got that it was perhaps impossible for ke to be saved (which I know is wrong)
? … what is ke to be saved ?
 
Good Morning jcm,
but he condescends
This is confusing, as Christ was made man. It is hardly a condescending position.
It’s not true that ignorance and sin come from lack of awareness. These things are worked at, they are practiced.
Let us investigate a little. Why does a person practice sin? Why does a person practice ignorance? It would be good to create a little scenario. What I am talking about is observation, if we simply judge without making observations, we make many assumptions.
Evil does not just appear out of thin air because we didn’t know about “such and such”.
I agree. When a person steals, his desire for the goods did not come out of thin air, we all have the desire for wealth, possessions. This desire is part of our nature, and it serves us, as it does squirrels who hoard and bears who constantly push for more territory.
When Christ asks “Father forgive them, they know not what they do” he is not asking for a free pass due to their ignorance of his divinity. He is not granting them on the spot absolution either.

Is it fair to say that Christ is praying for them? I think it is.
It is fair to say that Jesus understood their position, and forgave them from the heart. And yes, He was praying for them. The rest of it is speculation, I don’t know. What I do know is that we know the Father by knowing Him, and He presents a position of forgiveness of those who persecuted Him, which reflects “Christ did not come to condemn the world”. Knowing His forgiveness vs condemnation is part of that salvation, a big part.
 
Sin does not depend on a person’s knowledge of the sinfulness; sin is objectively wrong. Drinking poison will injure or kill you regardless of whether you knew it was poison or not.

What Does depend on a person’s knowledge is the degree of their culpability— and IMO this is what Jesus meant by his words on the cross. If you knowlingly and with full consent drink poison, you are guilty of the sin of murder by taking one’s own life. If you consume something that you have reason to believe Might be dangerous (and have Some outweighing moral circumstance for doing so), or if you know it will be harmful but not necessarily that it will kill you, then your guilt is lessened or mitigated in Some way and you may be guilty at the least of recklessly, but not fully intentionally, endangering your self.

Some other examples might be: If someone is deceived by no fault of their own that something is Not sinful when it actually is so. If someone is not fully capable of consenting or appropriately judging the sinfulness of the action (such as by force or coercion, mental or intellectual impairment, gross immaturity, or some other extenuating circumstance).

Shoplifting is wrong, but in a wartorn country where the only way to feed your children is by stealing a loaf of bread because through no fault of your own you have no money and your children will otherwise starve can drive a person who would never otherwise steal into doing so due to the desperation of their circumstance.
 
Last edited:
If I could go to confession, I would. I wanted to go to confession,
Well, you sound remorseful, so confession is appropriate. If you are not physically able to go, a priest can go to you. Please take care. You have my prayers.
aside from the numb feeling I got that it was perhaps impossible for ke to be saved (which I know is wrong)
This numb feeling is the self-condemnation, the guilt speaking to you. It is a blindness.

Do you see what I mean about blindness? Yes, you know that the voice is wrong, but it is there, taking priority over your behaviors. The voice says “It’s no use, you are doomed”, but that is not the voice of God. Nor was the voice of God the one that said to sin in the first place.

Even so, there was good intent in both choosing to sin (you saw good in it) and in choosing not to go to confession (you see good in continuing to resent yourself, to self-punish). What I am saying is that we can forgive our motives, we can reconcile with them, without actually letting ourselves be enslaved by them. Having our choices heavily influenced by desire is slavery. Hanging onto guilt is slavery.

Does that make sense?

Blessings to you
 
Typo. Meant “me”
thanks

The only time it is impossible for one to be saved, is when they refuse to be sorry. Final impenitence is referred to as the sin against the Holy Spirit. I hope you got to confession
 
Last edited:
Good Morning Lotus!
Sin does not depend on a person’s knowledge of the sinfulness; sin is objectively wrong.
Yes, but it can be more sinful to avoid a sin sometimes, and your shoplifting example was a great illustration.
What Does depend on a person’s knowledge is the degree of their culpability
Culpability means “blame-ability”. Jesus did not blame the crowd, He forgave them. He forgave them at a deeper level, He understood them and saw their blindness and ignorance.

The observation I am making is that people always have such blindness and ignorance when they sin. I cannot find a counterexample.
If you knowlingly and with full consent drink poison, you are guilty of the sin of murder by taking one’s own life.
If a person sees his own life as having negative value, then he does not know what he is doing. People do not take their lives when they see value in life. Seeing value is the state of awareness, seeing lack of value is a state of ignorance or blindness.

Most people who take their lives are suffering, and suffering can blind us to the value of life, for sure.

So it can be observed that yes, the person committed the sin of murder. It can also be observed that he did not know what he was doing.
 
Last edited:
The only time it is impossible for one to be saved, is when they refuse to be sorry. Final impenitence is referred to as the sin against the Holy Spirit.
Have you seen that a person who refuses to be sorry does not know what he is doing? (I’m not addressing the instance of the person you wrote this post to, who appears remorseful.)
 
Last edited:
40.png
steve-b:
The only time it is impossible for one to be saved, is when they refuse to be sorry. Final impenitence is referred to as the sin against the Holy Spirit.
Have you seen that a person who refuses to be sorry does not know what he is doing? (I’m not addressing the instance of the person you wrote this post to, who appears remorseful.)
The mentally challenged, or insane, depending on degree of deficit, could be argued they don’t know what they are doing, nor be truly sorry for what they do

That said

Augustine addresses those who try and excuse themselves of sin on account of ignorance

http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/1510.htm see Ch 5 but don’t stop there
 
Last edited:
Most people who take their lives are suffering, and suffering can blind us to the value of life, for sure.

So it can be observed that yes, the person committed the sin of murder. It can also be observed that he did not know what he was doing.
That’s why I said with knowledge and full consent. A person suffering from mental illness (and I am one) to the point of being suicidal might have full knowledge, but not full consent or even full will. By definition, their perception of reality and thus objective truth/ morality is not fully in conformity with objective reality, which can alter their sense of morality. That doesn’t change the fact that suicide is wrong, but it does mitigate their guilt of deliberate self-murder since presumably if they were of sound mind they would not freely consent to killing themselves.
 
Good Morning jcm,
40.png
jcm2017:
but he condescends
This is confusing, as Christ was made man. It is hardly a condescending position.
ay yi yi. 🤦‍♂️
God’s condescension in Christ does not have that connotation.
It’s a well established concept in theology.
I have work to do. God bless.
 
The mentally challenged, or insane, depending on degree of deficit
Hmm, okay, I see this too. Can you see that all of us are subject to the deficit?

We are born essentially ignorant (lacking awareness) and we are all subject to blindness. Try to create a scenario where someone knows what they are doing when refusing to be sorry. I don’t see it.
Augustine addresses those who try and excuse themselves of sin on account of ignorance

http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/1510.htm see Ch 5 but don’t stop there
Augustine does not address the reason why a person would try to excuse themselves (avoid penalty) on account of ignorance, that such a person going this route does not know what they are doing.

Augustine does have a great section of his book Confessions when he talks about “why men sin”. It is excellent.
 
presumably if they were of sound mind they would not freely consent to killing themselves.
Exactly. The person would not know what they are doing. The observation I am making is that this is always the case when people sin.
 
I hope you got to confession
While @Brittany identifies as Catholic, from what I recall she is 17 and has not begun RCIA yet. She is being raised by Baptist parents and plans on going through RCIA when she moves out.
 
ay yi yi. 🤦‍♂️

God’s condescension in Christ does not have that connotation.
No condescension on your part intended, of course.🙂 Perhaps a bit of frustration?

hehe. that’s what you get for using jargon. A Catholic writer did not use your definition here.

Hope you can come back and answer the questions from my post… when you’re not busy…

Thanks, and blessing to you
 
Last edited:
40.png
OneSheep:
Most people who take their lives are suffering, and suffering can blind us to the value of life, for sure.

So it can be observed that yes, the person committed the sin of murder. It can also be observed that he did not know what he was doing.
That’s why I said with knowledge and full consent. A person suffering from mental illness (and I am one) to the point of being suicidal might have full knowledge, but not full consent or even full will. By definition, their perception of reality and thus objective truth/ morality is not fully in conformity with objective reality, which can alter their sense of morality. That doesn’t change the fact that suicide is wrong, but it does mitigate their guilt of deliberate self-murder since presumably if they were of sound mind they would not freely consent to killing themselves.
I was shopping one day in a local supermarket. I saw two adults trying to navigate the isles looking for a specific item… (jam). I saw this and tried to help, directing them to the proper isle… with no success. A woman came up to me and said these are my students. I asked her, are these students mentally challenged? She said yes. I also asked, are their IQ"S less than 40? She said yes. They couldn’t follow even the simplest instructions. But there was an effort to try, both from the 2 students and the teacher trying to work with them.

To qualify this example, one’s deficit in their mental capacity, predicts one’s ability to understand even the simplest direction and concepts.

To be fair, I would just say,

A professional, NOT the individual in question, having the difficulty, needs to be the one assessing the person’s deficit and by degree, when/if one exists.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top