P
phil8888
Guest
That’s not a very nice thing to say. I thought he/she was just asking an honest question.Do you have any idea how selfish you sound?
That’s not a very nice thing to say. I thought he/she was just asking an honest question.Do you have any idea how selfish you sound?
If you are putting it away in order to save it to spend when you need it during your retirement then I would guess it could not be considered an “excess”.During the homily yesterday, my priest said that people that have less than us have a “right” to our excesses. He said we need to give away our excess and not put it in the bank because it according to God it belongs to the poor, and I am being selfish if I keep it.
What if your heirs don’t need it? How do I determine how much my heirs need?If any more is left over after you die and it goes to your heirs who need it, that could not be considered an excess either.
You ask a simple question, “Do I want to leave this money to the children I brought into this world, and whom I love with all my being, or do I want to leave it to a government bureaucrat who I never met?”What if your heirs don’t need it? How do I determine how much my heirs need?
Are those my only two choices?You ask a simple question, “Do I want to leave this money to the children I brought into this world, and whom I love with all my being, or do I want to leave it to a government bureaucrat who I never met?”![]()
You don’t need to. If the money is excess to them they can give it to the poor.What if your heirs don’t need it? How do I determine how much my heirs need?
What if my heirs are greedy? Should I skip giving it to them and give it directly to the poor?You don’t need to. If the money is excess to them they can give it to the poor.
You can do whatever you want with it. I’m not proposing a rule.What if my heirs are greedy? Should I skip giving it to them and give it directly to the poor?
Pretty much. You either designate heirs or the government takes it – and often they take it anyway, or a good chunk of it.Are those my only two choices?
There’s a big difference between my obligation to help others and someone having a right to my money.Read todays Scipture Reading (August 25)and that should solve once and for all you questions. That is spiritually inspire by the Holy Spirit and nothing anyone says can conflict with it without being cast to Satan.
The link is ewtn.com/devotionals/inspiration.htm#25
God bless you.
I believe we do this in just about in every country in the world already as a nation and we do it through our government policies and private businesses. I am sure you have heard of Walmart. The Roman Catholic Church also do this through Social Programs and Their Agencies (I guess you can call them that). Like I mention before Mother Teresa Sisters of Charity is a great example and I am sure there are many more wonderful agency and do they have a right to your money? In the government case you have no choice but in the Roman Catholic case you do. You choice, I done made my choice. God bless you. Respectfully, Donald W.There’s a big difference between my obligation to help others and someone having a right to my money.
We can do more good by investing in businesses that employ people and make them self-sufficient than we can by simply handing over our money to the government or some faceless agency.
Then we are in agreement.I am an investor myself (howbeit-a small one). Yes, I believe we should do things that will increase capitalism. Such as investing in business and starting our own businesses.
If your issue is that we should not just be giving money to other country in need and just start businesses in the third world country. Well, as I see it, that argument is certiantly well beyound my ability or education to argue, however I rather them carry a barge full of grain(which I know they do because I work off shore on boats) than to carry a ship full of marines because people are oppress by their own government.Should we give our money to some faceless government agency. As I see it, we have no choice, it is call taxes and unless you pay them they will take everything you own and throw you in jail; we can however write our representatives and elect those we believe will be in our best interest and form groups that can lobby congress.
That’s a pretty broad indictment. Do you have any evidence that this is what we do?I much rather see the Central Intelligence over seas trying to figure out how to help the local than trying to figure out how our businesses can get one up on a foreign country and take what is theirs at a unfair price just so U.S. businesses can maintain a digusting rich nation status.
I am talking about the difference between charity (fulfilling our duties under the Corporal Works of Mercy) and Social Justice – re-wiring the system so most people no longer need charity – to which this particular forum is dedicated…Which government agency are you particularly taking about or is this a Roman Catholic agency you are talking about. This is a very very broad subject.