Does Baptism Wash Away All Sin and RCIA

  • Thread starter Thread starter Imcatholic7
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
But his point was that everyone in his RCIA process was made to go to confession, both candidates and catechumens. I’ve heard of that happening in more than one parish. Doesn’t make it right, but it is happening.
It does happen,a lot actually. When I was teaching RCIA the DRE said it was better to do it that way because otherwise those who didn’t go to reconciliation might feel left out and that they missed something. That apparently is one of the the major concerns.
 
It does happen,a lot actually. When I was teaching RCIA the DRE said it was better to do it that way because otherwise those who didn’t go to reconciliation might feel left out and that they missed something. That apparently is one of the the major concerns.
So let’s have them simulate a sacrament so they don’t feel left out??

I’d ask the DRE if he/she really thinks they’re ready for Baptism if they don’t understand the basic concept that Baptism tomorrow will wash away all their sins.
 
It does happen,a lot actually. When I was teaching RCIA the DRE said it was better to do it that way because otherwise those who didn’t go to reconciliation might feel left out and that they missed something. That apparently is one of the the major concerns.
Where did this DRE get his/her credentials? From a Cracker Jack box?
 
Obviously, you’re proof that something that shouldn’t be happening still happens. I hope they explained that there was no point to it, since a non-baptized person cannot receive a sacrament.

Sometimes I wonder if those facilitating this process are actually qualified to do so. Have they actually read the RCIA book? There are many rituals before you are baptized but confession isn’t one of them.
It was the same for us though it was optional and we knew that it was pointless since all of our sins (up to that point) would be erased when we were reborn in Christ. I think it was more for getting a feel for it and overcoming any fear or trepidation of it (that I guess is quite common for many people). I was told it wasn’t mandatory and that it wouldn’t do anything but I went anyways. It lifted a heavy burden off my heart and let me celebrate my coming into the Church and Christ more joyously.
 
Where did this DRE get his/her credentials? From a Cracker Jack box?
This particular DRE is, and I use the term somewhat loosely, a Master Catechist, who actively instructs Catechists in Southern California in their formation and training and has given presentations and speeches at the Los Angeles Religious Education Congress on numerous occasions. She is generally regarded as an expert in the field of Catholic Religious Education.

The problem is deeper than many even imagine.
 
It does happen,a lot actually. When I was teaching RCIA the DRE said it was better to do it that way because otherwise those who didn’t go to reconciliation might feel left out and that they missed something. That apparently is one of the the major concerns.
~double facepalm~

I’m an RCIA coordinator at my parish, and I am very clear with our catechumens (un-Baptized) that they should not go to Confession before Baptism… Baptism is the gateway to the other sacraments, and it will wash away all of their sins anyway. They should begin going to Confession as-necessary for any sins they commit after Baptism.

They are, of course, welcome to meet with our Priests to discuss their sins if they feel it to be necessary, but it will not (and cannot) be a sacramental Confession.

We also walk everybody through the process in the class (even going down to the confessionals and letting them poke around), to make sure everybody – candidates and catechumens alike – are reasonably comfortable with the sacrament.

And by the way, I also first read the title as asking if Baptism washes away RCIA. I sure hope not ;).

God bless!
 
Does confession - without absolution, but completed in baptism - really present such a problem? Matthew 3 vs 5 & 6; Mark 1 v 5.
 
Does confession - without absolution, but completed in baptism - really present such a problem? Matthew 3 vs 5 & 6; Mark 1 v 5.
An act of saying aloud one’s sins is not a problem. Also, one may repent of those sins, asking God to forgive. Furthermore, the person could seek the advice of a priest for suggestions on how to avoid those sins in the future.

But it would be incorrect to tell someone who is not baptized that they can receive the sacrament of reconciliation before they get baptized. Usually I assume when someone says they plan to “go to confession” that this will involve a series of steps, one of which is receiving absolution through the priest in the sacrament of reconciliation.
 
An act of saying aloud one’s sins is not a problem. Also, one may repent of those sins, asking God to forgive. Furthermore, the person could seek the advice of a priest for suggestions on how to avoid those sins in the future.
That is more or less exactly what I said or implied.
But it would be incorrect to tell someone who is not baptized that they can receive the sacrament of reconciliation before they get baptized.
That is not at all what I said or implied.
Usually I assume when someone says they plan to “go to confession” that this will involve a series of steps, one of which is receiving absolution through the priest in the sacrament of reconciliation.
This is restrictive and limits the use and meaning of the word unnecessarily; it is not wise to make assumptions; it is always good to study and analyse the context. Confessing to the police that one has committed murder in no way suggests sacrament and absolution - but it is still confession. Confession as preparation for baptism (for those of a suitable age) can surely be nothing but a great source of grace and a slap in the face for the one renounced by the candidate before he enters the water - a very positive renunciation.
 
What if you are baptized Catholic, leave, and get re-baptized in another denomination. . .
does that baptism wash away all past sins or does it have no effect because you’ve already been baptized and its an indelible mark and therefore, confession is what is really needed?
The second baptism has no effect because a person can only be baptised once. To return to the Roman Catholic church, the person needs to go to confession.
 
That is not at all what I said or implied.
I don’t know how to interpret what you are thinking right now that you say this. I fear there is a chance we are not communicating fully. Perhaps you are thinking I meant to say that you said something or another. I did not mean to imply anything about what you said by my second paragraph in my response to you. I was returning to the line of posts started by thistle talking about “First Confession”. I should have been more clear that I returned to the thistle context of going to confession, and not the rowlands context of confession without absolution. I don’t think the thistle context was one of police stations or the like, based upon what I know about thistle as a poster, and based upon Catholic usage like “I made my First Communion” or “I made my First Confession”. I was trying to say I interpreted thistle to be talking about his RCIA fellows going to actual confession, the sacrament of confession, which does include absolution. Perhaps thistle only meant that they talked to a priest, I concede that it is possible that I misunderstood.

I hope that helps clarify my muddle that I seem to have made. 😦
 
Am I the only one who opened this thread wondering if the OP was going to ask if baptism washes away RCIA? I wanted to see the responses to that one. :hmmm:
I thought that too. After hearing about what’s taught at some RCIA classes, I was kinda hoping that it does. 😃
 
No, it wasn’t.

Baptism is the gateway to all other sacraments. It is not possible to receive the sacrament of reconciliation if you are not baptized.

You simulated confession and this was a grave abuse on the part of the RCIA director or whoever thought up sending catechumens to confession. It was not grave on your part, since you did not know any better.

It would have been appropriate for the RCIA diretor and priest to have you practice confession for after you are baptized-- go in, say the prayers, have father say “now this is what I will do next…”, etc. But, it would need to be (a) very clear this is not an actual confession and (b) the priest should not say words of absolution. Showing you how to confess is fine. Sending unbaptized people into confession as if it were an actual sacrament, not fine.
First off, this was in 1992 and not only applied to the group I was in but all RCIA people in the country (I was an ex-pat in Singapore at the time).
Second, it was not a simulation and we all received a Certificate of Reconciliation for our first Confession to evidence when we did it.
Third, you do realise don’t you that those in the RCIA group who fully intend to go ahead and officially become Catholic would be captured under Baptism of Desire anyway.
 
First off, this was in 1992 and not only applied to the group I was in but all RCIA people in the country (I was an ex-pat in Singapore at the time).
It doesn’t really matter how widespread it was, although that just makes it worse in my mind.
Second, it was not a simulation and we all received a Certificate of Reconciliation for our first Confession to evidence when we did it.
It was not a simulation for the baptized candidates. It certainly was for the unbaptized catechumens as it is not possible for them to receive the sacrament of reconillition.
Third, you do realise don’t you that those in the RCIA group who fully intend to go ahead and officially become Catholic would be captured under Baptism of Desire anyway.
Only if they died before baptism. Which has nothing to do with the topic at hand.
 
It doesn’t really matter how widespread it was, although that just makes it worse in my mind.

It was not a simulation for the baptized candidates. It certainly was for the unbaptized catechumens as it is not possible for them to receive the sacrament of reconillition.

Only if they died before baptism. Which has nothing to do with the topic at hand.
It means those in RCIA even one day before publicly becoming Catholics are in essence already baptised and Catholic through baptism of desire.

As for the first point I’ve emailed my mentor and priest (the one who led the RCIA group I was in and the one who heard our Confessions) to ask him why it was done the day before and if it was merely a simulation or not? I’ll let you know what he says when he gets back to me.
 
It means those in RCIA even one day before publicly becoming Catholics are in essence already baptised and Catholic through baptism of desire.
No, it doesn’t.

One is not “in essence” baptized. One is either baptized or not baptized.

If one is not baptized and dies as a catechumen or elect, one then receives baptism by desire.
As for the first point I’ve emailed my mentor and priest (the one who led the RCIA group I was in and the one who heard our Confessions) to ask him why it was done the day before and if it was merely a simulation or not? I’ll let you know what he says when he gets back to me.
Great!

It is not possible for a person who is not yet baptized to receive any other sacrament, it simply isn’t valid:

Can.* 842 §1. A person who has not received baptism cannot be admitted validly to the other sacraments.
 
The second baptism has no effect because a person can only be baptised once. To return to the Roman Catholic church, the person needs to go to confession.
Well suppose you have no desire to ever return to the Catholic Church?
 
But his point was that everyone in his RCIA process was made to go to confession, both candidates and catechumens. I’ve heard of that happening in more than one parish. Doesn’t make it right, but it is happening.
We’ll call it a practice run for the unbaptized 😉
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top