Bees are evolved wasps, and wasps are evolved ants. Both ants and wasps were around a long time before pollen. The arrival of pollen opened a new ecological niche, and some wasps evolved to fill that niche and exploit the new food source.
And Eukaryotes split into 7 organisms ?
Why would you expect an ancient bacteria to be susceptible to an antibiotic designed in the current times?
Look at your diagram again. Porifera (sponges) have already split off before your diagram starts. Then the Cnidaria (jellyfish) branch off. The next split is the Protostome/Deuterostome divergence before the Marinoan glaciation. All the other splits are similar: one clade diverges into two separate clades.
Where was these Eukaryotes located on the earth before the first split ?Techno2000:
Look at your diagram again. Porifera (sponges) have already split off before your diagram starts. Then the Cnidaria (jellyfish) branch off. The next split is the Protostome/Deuterostome divergence before the Marinoan glaciation. All the other splits are similar: one clade diverges into two separate clades.
The diagram is obviously simplified. Chordates are not the only type of Deuterostome. Hemichordate worms and starfish (Echinoderms) are also Deuterostomes.
Life is a nested hierarchy within the “Life onEarth” kind. Think about people living on the American continent. There are three large groups: North Americans, Central Americans and South Americans. North Americans are split into USAnians and Canadians. USAnians are split into Texans, New Yorkers, Californians etc. The smaller groups are nested within the larger groups.
It is the same for living organisms. Humans are nested within Mammals, Tetrapods, Chordates, Deuterostomes and Eukaryotes.
This is basic Evolution101. Do you not understand what it is you are arguing against? If you want to successfully argue against something, you need to understand it thoroughly.
rossum
They were living in two parts. Look up the history and origin of Mitochondria. You might also usefully study Endosymbiosis.
I finish reading the link you gave me, at least it was honest when it used words like may and possibility. :Techno2000:
Look at your diagram again. Porifera (sponges) have already split off before your diagram starts. Then the Cnidaria (jellyfish) branch off. The next split is the Protostome/Deuterostome divergence before the Marinoan glaciation. All the other splits are similar: one clade diverges into two separate clades.
The diagram is obviously simplified. Chordates are not the only type of Deuterostome. Hemichordate worms and starfish (Echinoderms) are also Deuterostomes.
Life is a nested hierarchy within the “Life onEarth” kind. Think about people living on the American continent. There are three large groups: North Americans, Central Americans and South Americans. North Americans are split into USAnians and Canadians. USAnians are split into Texans, New Yorkers, Californians etc. The smaller groups are nested within the larger groups.
It is the same for living organisms. Humans are nested within Mammals, Tetrapods, Chordates, Deuterostomes and Eukaryotes.
This is basic Evolution101. Do you not understand what it is you are arguing against? If you want to successfully argue against something, you need to understand it thoroughly.
rossum
So, Eukaryotes out of the blue, just morphed into sponges, and also what did the sponges eat?
Yes it does. That is the way science works. If something is 100%, then science says is and must. If it is 99% or less, then it says may and possibly. Look at the referenced papers to find the actual percentages, together with their margins of error.
What part of the word random in “random mutations” do you have a problem with?
No, the first sponges that came about from “random mutations” what did they eat ?
OK, a biology lesson. I’m sorry if this is boring, but it is obviously needed.
Bugs and critters - generic terms which include unicellular life forms. Unless you have a PhD in biology, you would not be familiar with these very sophisticated and very scientific terms.
It is useful for undermining the authority of Scripture, sowing doubts in the minds of believers, and for promoting atheism.
Because biology is linked to the creation of life. Invent a theory of biology that does away with the need for a Creator and you’re gone a long way to getting rid of the need for God altogether.
I don’t believe you.
Way, way before even one volt could be produced, millions of tiny mutations would be necessary, none of which would confer a survival advantage. So these mutations accumulated as a result of pure chance. Yep, a machine that generates electricity can evolve by sheer luck. Apparently, this is science.
Unless a lung system is 100% intact, it is useless, so a partially-evolved lung system wouldn’t confer any survival advantage. In other words, you believe a complete lung system evolved in a fish as a result of pure chance. I may as well believe in fairies as believe that.