Does Darwin's theory of evolution contradict Catholicsm?

  • Thread starter Thread starter theCardinalbird
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
“Of course, no species has 'chosen’ a strategy. Rather, its ancestors ‘little by little, generation after generation’ merely wandered into a successful way of life through the action of random evolutionary forces. Once pointed in a certain direction, a line of evolution survives only if the cosmic dice continues to roll in its favor. “[J]ust by chance, a wonderful diversity of life has developed during the billions of years in which organisms have been evolving on earth.
(Biology by Burton S. Guttman (1st ed., McGraw Hill, 1999), pgs. 36-37.)

“It is difficult to avoid the speculation that Darwin, as has been the case with others, found the implications of his theory difficult to confront. “The real difficulty in accepting Darwins theory has always been that it seems to diminish our significance. Earlier, astronomy had made it clear that the earth is not the center of the solar universe, or even of our own solar system. Now the new biology asked us to accept the proposition that, like all other organisms, we too are the products of a random process that, as far as science can show, we are not created for any special purpose or as part of any universal design.”
(Invitation to Biology, by Helena Curtis & N. Sue Barnes(3rd ed., Worth, 1981), pgs. 474-475.)
[/quote]
 
Non-living chemicals evolved to become living organisms? Life cannot come from non-life. Only science matters to some people. God? Pffft. Show me God.
 
“The evolution of humans from earlier hominids is an established scientific fact.” - Rossum. Not reproducible in the lab. So, it’s just wishful thinking.
 
Romans 1:20

New International Version
“For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities–his eternal power and divine nature–have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse.”

New Living Translation
“For ever since the world was created, people have seen the earth and sky. Through everything God made, they can clearly see his invisible qualities–his eternal power and divine nature. So they have no excuse for not knowing God.”

English Standard Version
“For his invisible attributes, namely, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world, in the things that have been made. So they are without excuse.”
 
Not reproducible in the lab. So, it’s just wishful thinking.
Why “wishful”? Is it driven by a desire to believe a certain outcome or is it simply where a God-given enquiring mind leads us? Or is it used to denigrate what can’t be seen with our own eyes like a doubting Thomas? Were heavy elements such as iron produced in the stars?
 
[E]volution works without either plan or purpose — Evolution is random and undirected
This indeed seems correct. Do you believe each cancer, each genetically directed affliction was a directed outcome? I don’t.

Mutations are indistinguishable from random events and those beneficial proliferate. Denying this does not merely reflect a belief in God but a need to constrain his place and nature and manner of creation. It is as much a philosophical leap as it is to declare that evolution means “no God”.
 
Last edited:
Is it reproducible or not? Easy question.

Where is this “stars” reference coming from? Partial lyrics from Woodstock, written by Joni Mitchell, 1969.

“We are stardust
Billion year old carbon
We are golden
Caught in the devil’s bargain
And we’ve got to get ourselves
back to the garden”

Also performed by Crosby, Stills, Nash & Young, 1970
 
Your last sentence allows certain people to believe “Darwin made it possible to be an intellectually fulfilled atheist.” - Richard Dawkins. It is the cornerstone of the non-belief movement. You can’t affirm God and affirm the quote you selected as well. No plan? No purpose? That’s “evolution.”?
 
Your last sentence allows certain people to believe “Darwin made it possible to be an intellectually fulfilled atheist.” - Richard Dawkins. It is the cornerstone of the non-belief movement. You can’t affirm God and affirm the quote you selected as well. No plan? No purpose? That’s “evolution.”?
Sorry Ed but I can’t follow you here at all. I did not quote anyone at all.

Are cancers directed?
 
Non-living chemicals evolved to become living organisms? Life cannot come from non-life. Only science matters to some people. God? Pffft. Show me God.
False. This is like “Liquid cannot emerge from gas”, yet water is formed from two gases. Life is an emergent property that is not found in any of its material constituents.

As to showing you god, how many do you want me to show?

rossum
 
Is it reproducible or not?
Is that a prerequisite for belief? Must it be seen in the lab? Is carbon dating wishful thinking? Are nuclear fusion, astrophysics and cosmology fairy tales?
 
Last edited:
“The evolution of humans from earlier hominids is an established scientific fact.” - Rossum. Not reproducible in the lab. So, it’s just wishful thinking.
OK, it is not an “established scientific fact”, it is just correct to odds of 2.3x10^93 to 1. That is pretty much as good as scientific facts get, there is always a margin of error in measurements.

Since we have not reproduced the sun in a lab either (it is rather too large to fit) then you presumably consider that the sun is also not “established scientific fact”.

rossum
 
Some people here want proof of God. The scientific method gives some here proof about certain things it has no business going into.
 
Last edited:
I have some questions about evolution.

If evolution were to exist, why would it happen? Why would apes reproduce and suddenly have a different kind of species (homo sapiens). Or if it was in “stages”, why would those stages happen out of the blue?
 
Last edited:
False. This is like “Liquid cannot emerge from gas”, yet water is formed from two gases. Life is an emergent property that is not found in any of its material constituents.
You throw out some kind of convoluted rebuttal that doesn’t show edwest to be false.
 
I have another question about Darwin’s theory.

If evolution were to exist, why would it happen? Why would apes reproduce and suddenly have a different kind of species (homo sapiens). Or if it was in “stages”, why would those stages happen out of the blue?
Because, atheist need something to hang their hat on.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top