Does Darwin's theory of evolution contradict Catholicsm?

  • Thread starter Thread starter theCardinalbird
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Haha. If it did have feathers, so did all of "its own kind… (Because God made them that way)
 
Last edited:
RoseofMary1 said:
and it says many times that he made them “each to its own kind.”
Click to expand...
Can you explain precisely what that means? I fail to see why you declare that God can’t do that via a process we would identify as evolution. Are you placing a constraint on God?
 
Darwin wanted to cut God out of the picture and claimed things just happened to evolve randomly. The point he was trying to make was that the universe “evolved” without God.
 
Exactly. God fashioned and created each species as He intended. They didn’t turn into each other. That’s why Darwin’s theory is unsupported with hard evidence, as there are NO transitional species. In fact, trying to combine two species produces a sterile animal that dies out (e.g., the mule).
 
Last edited:
Haha. For the entire town.

Can you imagine taking your sword to go slay a dragon to save the village when it was a reptilian dinosaur? Yikes.

China has the year of the dragon in which they still celebrate courage.
 
RoseofMary1 said:
Haha. For the entire town.

Can you imagine taking your sword to go slay a dragon to save the village when it was a reptilian dinosaur? Yikes.

China has the year of the dragon in which they still celebrate courage.
Click to expand...
It takes courage to slay Darwin’s theory of evolution .
 
Last edited:
And faith in God’s word.

Darwin’s theory is just a theory without real evidence.
 
People combine the horse and a donkey, which produces a mule. A mule is sterile. (I was thinking donkey instead of mule).
 
RoseofMary1 said:
You are being lied to by atheist scientists.
Click to expand...
Then I am also being lied to by Christian scientists, like Francis Collins. I am being lied to by Catholic scientists like Ken Miller.
This is in direct contradiction to the Bible…
Click to expand...
I agree that it is in direct contradiction to your personal interpretation of the Bible. Since I am not Christian, you will no doubt understand that I do not find an argument from the Bible to be convincing. If you can find a relevant passage in the Tripitaka, then by all means give me the reference.
Ancient cultures have stories of living dragons. There were even pictures of dragons on cathedrals. There are pictures of dragons/dinosaurs on Egyptian ruins.
Click to expand...
Ancient cultures have stories of living gods like Zeus and Anubis. There were even statues of Athene and Astarte in temples. There are pictures of Anubis, Horus and other gods on Egyptian ruins.

Your point is?

rossum
 
RoseofMary1 said:
People combine the horse and a donkey, which produces a mule. A mule is sterile. (I was thinking donkey instead of mule).
Click to expand...
People combine lions and tigers to get ligers and tigons. Half of the cross-breeds are fertile.

Very occasionally a mule is fertile: Morocco’s Miracle Mule.

The scientific explanation is that tigers and lions are in the process of separating, as are horses and donkeys. The two cats are not as far apart as the two equids.

rossum
 
rossum said:
40.png
RoseofMary1:
People combine the horse and a donkey, which produces a mule. A mule is sterile. (I was thinking donkey instead of mule).
Click to expand...
People combine lions and tigers to get ligers and tigons. Half of the cross-breeds are fertile.

Very occasionally a mule is fertile: Morocco’s Miracle Mule.

The scientific explanation is that tigers and lions are in the process of separating, as are horses and donkeys. The two cats are not as far apart as the two equids.

rossum
Click to expand...
A muskellunge fish and northern pike fish produces a sterile tiger muskie fish.

A Striped bass fish and white bass fish produces a sterile whiterock bass
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top