Does Darwin's theory of evolution contradict Catholicsm?

  • Thread starter Thread starter theCardinalbird
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Oh snap! lol. The author thought there was a sea in the air.
Which might make sense to someone who doesn’t know any better or had the benefit of modern science. Since water is rather heavy. How else would the water that pours down from the heavens when it rains stay up in the sky unless there was some vast solid dome holding it up there?
 
Last edited:
What was thought to cause the dome to leak from time to time?
Floodgates.

“It came about after the seven days, that the water of the flood came upon the earth. In the six hundredth year of Noah’s life, in the second month, on the seventeenth day of the month, on the same day all the fountains of the great deep burst open, and the floodgates of the sky were opened. The rain fell upon the earth for forty days and forty nights.” Genesis 7: 10-12

"YHVH will open the heavens, the storehouse of his bounty, to send rain on your land in season and to bless all the work of your hands. You will lend to many nations but will borrow from none. "Deuteronomy 28:12
 
St. Augustine on Genesis -
Usually, even a non-Christian knows something about the earth, the heavens, and the other elements of the world, about the motion and orbit of the stars and even their size and relative positions, about the predictable eclipses of the sun and moon, the cycles of the years and the seasons, about the kinds of animals, shrubs, stones, and so forth, and this knowledge he holds to as being certain from reason and experience. Now, it is a disgraceful and dangerous thing for an infidel to hear a Christian, presumably giving the meaning of Holy Scripture, talking nonsense on these topics; and we should take all means to prevent such an embarrassing situation, in which people show up vast ignorance in a Christian and laugh it to scorn. The shame is not so much that an ignorant individual is derided, but that people outside the household of faith think our sacred writers held such opinions, and, to the great loss of those for whose salvation we toil, the writers of our Scripture are criticized and rejected as unlearned men. If they find a Christian mistaken in a field which they themselves know well and hear him maintaining his foolish opinions about our books, how are they going to believe those books in matters concerning the resurrection of the dead, the hope of eternal life, and the kingdom of heaven, when they think their pages are full of falsehoods on facts which they themselves have learnt from experience and the light of reason? Reckless and incompetent expounders of Holy Scripture bring untold trouble and sorrow on their wiser brethren when they are caught in one of their mischievous false opinions and are taken to task by those who are not bound by the authority of our sacred books. For then, to defend their utterly foolish and obviously untrue statements, they will try to call upon Holy Scripture for proof and even recite from memory many passages which they think support their position, although they understand neither what they say nor the things about which they make assertion.
Noll, pp. 202-203, from the John Hammond Taylor translation of 1982)

Apparently Augustine didn’t believe the 7 days in Genesis were literal but were a literary structure. He believed creation happened instantaneously.

See Augustine: The Literal Meaning of Genesis – GeoChristian
 
Last edited:
Augustine on the firmament.
Augustine of Hippo (354-430 CE) where he explores interpretations of Genesis, and comments on the substance of the firmament:
A certain commentator has made a praiseworthy attempt to demonstrate that the waters are above the heavens, so as to support the word of Scripture with the visible and tangible phenomena of nature. First of all, he establishes the easiest step in his argument by showing that the air about us is also called “sky” or “heaven.” This is true not only in our ordinary speech, in which we refer to “a clear sky” or “a cloudy sky,” but also in the usage of Holy Scripture, in which there is mention of the birds of heaven (it is obvious that the birds fly in this air about us); and our Lord, when He spoke of the clouds, said, You know how to read the face of heaven. We often see the clouds gather also in the air near the earth, and in that case settle on the slopes of hills so that most of the mountain peaks tower above them.
Code:
The commentator referred to above, having proved that the atmosphere near us is called heaven, wished it also to be designated by the term "firmament," for the simple reason that he divides its space between water in a vaporous state and water in a denser state that flows to earth. The clouds, according to the testimony of those who have walked through them in the mountains, have this vaporous appearance, formed, as they are, of the most minute drops which are gathered and rolled together. And if further condensation takes place, so that one large drop is formed out of many small ones, the air, unable to support it, yields to its weight as it travels, down, and this is the explanation of rain. Hence, from the existence of the air between the vapors that form the clouds above and the seas that stretch out below, our commentator proposed to show that there is a heaven between water and water. This painstaking enquiry is, in my opinion, quite praiseworthy; for the theory advanced is not contrary to the faith, and it makes it possible for one to accept the evidence at hand.
The Literal Meaning of Genesis (De Genesi ad Litteram), Volume 1, Book Two, Chapter 4
 
40.png
Techno2000:
rossum, did Neandertals go through re-birth ?
Of course. All devils, animals, humans and gods go through rebirth. Neanderthals were no exception.

rossum
Even single-celled Organisms ?
 
Anyone who ascribes a scientific literalism to Genesis must give credence to a dome in the sky. And Jonah literally in the belly of a whale. Etc… You either admit of various senses of scripture or you are a fundametalist literalist.
If the Jonah story is a myth, why did Jesus say, “Jonah was three days and three nights in the belly of a whale” when answering the Pharisees in Matt 12:-38-41?

Do you think Jesus was in the habit of dealing with a serious challenge by retorting with a fairy tale? If so, then that doesn’t seem to do much for his credibility.

Also, Jesus was comparing Jonah’s “three days and three nights in the belly of the whale” to the three days and three nights Jesus would spend in the belly of the earth between his death and resurrection. It’s unlikely he would liken his death and resurrection to a fairy tale.

Anyways, why doubt the story of Jonah, when any miracle in the Bible is just as incredible? Why should being in the belly of a whale for three days be any harder to believe than a virgin birth or a dead man being resurrected and walking through walls?
the approach that Glark and others use is NOT Catholic
Er, how is my approach “NOT Catholic”? Your answer is something I really need to hear - my eternal destiny could depend on it!

Is it true that all sins can be forgiven … except for a sin against evolution?
 
Last edited:
I was hoping you could answer this simple question from my previous post:

If you were walking on a beach and found your name written in the sand, would you conclude it’s the result of a fluke of nature?
 
If I understand Glark’s reading of Genesis, God did a bit of a shandy. Brought the universe to a curious state using the natural processes (perhaps starting with a Big Bang?)
You haven’t understood Glark’s reading of Genesis - Glark believes God created the universe by the snap-fingers method; no natural processes.
where there was an earth with light but no Sun
“And the city hath no need of the sun, nor of the moon, to shine in it” - Rev 21:23

“And night shall be no more: and they shall not need the light of the lamp, nor the light of the sun, because the Lord God shall enlighten them, and they shall reign for ever and ever” - Rev 23:5
 
Last edited:
Oh snap! lol. The author thought there was a sea in the air.
And he was right - it is estimated that there are literally millions of billions of gallons of water in the earth’s atmosphere at any one time. That’s … a lot.

Have you ever noticed rain falling from the sky? It is rumoured that sometimes so much rain fallls that is causes massive floods.
 
Last edited:
Apparently Augustine didn’t believe the 7 days in Genesis were literal but were a literary structure. He believed creation happened instantaneously.
His interpretation doesn’t exactly do billions of years of evolution any favours. He also didn’t oppose a literal “six days” interpretation.
 
Last edited:
Of course. All devils, animals, humans and gods go through rebirth. Neanderthals were no exception
I would like to be rebirthed as some kind of vegetable. A cauliflower would be nice. Can this be arranged?
 
Last edited:
You haven’t understood Glark’s reading of Genesis - Glark believes God created the universe by the snap-fingers method; no natural processes.
But what was the initial state created? Big Bang like, with natural processes following, or all the stars and planets “snapped” into place. You see, the latter would be at odds with observation, but the former not.
 
But what was the initial state created? Big Bang like, with natural processes following, or all the stars and planets “snapped” into place. You see, the latter would be at odds with observation, but the former not.
I guess God could have snapped his fingers and caused a (perceived) Big Bang and then moved all the bits and pieces into place.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top