L
levinas12
Guest
I really need an authoritative cite on God having just one divine intellect and one divine will. Of course, Jesus has additionally a human intellect and a human will.
Aquinas addresses divine simplicity in the ST. But I can’t find an ST cite that specifically talks about one divine intellect and one divine will.
This is relevant to the understanding of “person” with respect to the Trinity. If God has just one divine intellect and one divine will, then the divine “persons” would not have their own separate divine intellects and divine wills. And, in modern parlance, there would not be three self-consciousnesses - just one “self-consciousness” that the three divine persons “share” (to put it very loosely).
This scenario preserves the unity of God. There would be no risk of tritheism. But the notion of “person” it entails is different from the usual understanding of a person possessing his/her own intellect and will. And likewise is different from the modern notion of “person” as having his/her own singular self or “center of consciousness” (Descartes et al).
It would also circumscribe marriage as an image of God (e.g., in the Theology of the Body). Yes, marriage reflects two persons in one flesh, and thus is iconic of the unity of the plurality of divine persons in the Trinity. But the married persons still have separate intellects and wills.
Augustine used a different image of the Trinity based on the rational faculties of the individual human being (memory, knowledge and loving). This approach accents the unity of God but is also closed in on just one individual (does not include a plurality of persons).
Aquinas addresses divine simplicity in the ST. But I can’t find an ST cite that specifically talks about one divine intellect and one divine will.
This is relevant to the understanding of “person” with respect to the Trinity. If God has just one divine intellect and one divine will, then the divine “persons” would not have their own separate divine intellects and divine wills. And, in modern parlance, there would not be three self-consciousnesses - just one “self-consciousness” that the three divine persons “share” (to put it very loosely).
This scenario preserves the unity of God. There would be no risk of tritheism. But the notion of “person” it entails is different from the usual understanding of a person possessing his/her own intellect and will. And likewise is different from the modern notion of “person” as having his/her own singular self or “center of consciousness” (Descartes et al).
It would also circumscribe marriage as an image of God (e.g., in the Theology of the Body). Yes, marriage reflects two persons in one flesh, and thus is iconic of the unity of the plurality of divine persons in the Trinity. But the married persons still have separate intellects and wills.
Augustine used a different image of the Trinity based on the rational faculties of the individual human being (memory, knowledge and loving). This approach accents the unity of God but is also closed in on just one individual (does not include a plurality of persons).