This seems counter to everything I keep hearing Catholics say… “God is love” etc etc.
A God that would hate seems more human than God.
Once again, it depends what you mean be “love” and “hate.” Both words can refer to emotional inclinations (e.g. I love chocolate, I hate soup). But love, in the volitional sense (i.e. pertaining to the will), can mean “seeking what is best for the thing loved.” As I said in a previous post, God can be said to hate the devil insofar as He does not seek the devil’s ultimate good (which would be heaven, since the angels were meant for being in heaven) and this is because the devil has eternally refused heaven. However, in another sense, God can be said to love the devil as He seeks what is best for the devil
given the devil’s state … that is, Hell is now the best place for the devil given what he has chosen (though it is not natural to his angelic nature) because it would be harmful for guilty person to enter into eternal happiness (which I explained before).
I go into this further in the previous post.
Also, hate is not necessarily the opposite of love. It depends what you mean by “opposite.” If you mean hate is the
negation of love, I don’t think this is true (correct me if I’m wrong). A rock doesn’t love me, but it doesn’t hate me either.
My answer would be NO. Here is why the devil is evil. God hates evil. The devil is full of les.God hates lies. No God could never love evil.
This does not imply that the devil is ontologically evil. Ontological evil does not exist. God loves all beings, and thus loves the devil in that sense.
You just made my point… God might not love the evil and sin, but to hate another sentient being is not an attribute I would attach to God. Unless you think the devil is not sentient and is just a personification of the evils of the world, which honestly makes more sense anyway.
The devil indeed exists and he is
rational (“sentient” technically means “having senses” and doesn’t have to do with having an intellect … at least, that’s the traditional definition, before some ignoramus began using it differently … sorry, it’s a touchy subject)
Subjectivity means a lot though… lets say a guy puts a knife to my back and wants my wallet… do I hate him? Well… he’s risking serious jail time over a wallet with maybe $20 in it. Why? He’s probably broke, maybe homeless, perhaps with a bad addiction… maybe he’s even trying to feed his kids the only way he still can because he’s out of work. Maybe he’s just lazy and wants a sandwich but his violence stems from a poor childhood. Besides, what I would personally feel is irrelevant. We’re not talking about a human, we’re talking about God.
It’s true that someone could possibly so emotionally messed up that they are not responsible for their actions. We should never hate anyone no matter what … insofar as we shouldn’t want what’s worst for them (especially, we shouldn’t want them to go to hell).
Then again, maybe you’re right. God sure did hate a lot in the OT.
I think this is true, considering the choice of usage of the word “hate.” The Psalms do say “God hates those who do evil” which I think is awesome.

(although, I’m screwed)
But in this sense, as I explained in my last post, this is referring to another kind of hate. You can be said to hate something if you fight it because it stands in the way of some goal. Hence, anything you fight because it impedes you can be considered a kind of “hate.” You may still seek what’s best for the object of your hatred (that is, you may still want a person to go to heaven, even if you’re trying to shoot him). Thus, sinners are people who seek to frustrate God’s plan and bring souls (esp. their own souls) to hell. Thus, since they oppose God’s goal, God hates them. God hates the devil in that sense too.
Usually, we don’t talk about God’s hate in that sense because we want to emphasize God’s love in the sense that He wants everyone to go to heaven. In fact, we emphasis that so much, that confusion arises when we read in the Psalms that “God hates those who do evil.” Seldom is this clarified, and it took many years searching the tomes of Scholastic philosophy for me to find the answer (and I hope that is the answer … but men of higher wisdom, correct me if I’m wrong). But no matter. Did that make sense?