Does God only like Jews?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jessup
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
J

Jessup

Guest
So I was listening to some EWTN and I had been pondering this for a while as well.
But since the Jews are God’s chosen people, why doesn’t God like everyone else?
Especially some 5000 years later after picking out what people are his favorites.
On top of that;
I had heard on EWTN that at first St. Peter didn’t want to baptize Gentiles
,(a derogatory term.)
Doesn’t this make St. Peter a bigot; the whole thing sounds a bit hoaky to me.
 
It is not hoaky at all.

First of all, God DOES NOT LOVE only the Jews,
and ANY GOOD JEWISH PERSON will flat-out tell you so.
My best friends are Jewish and openly do NOT believe that you have to be
officially JEWISH to be a Friend of God (Hashem as many of them prefer to call him).
They believe that many, many gentiles will be in God’s favor if they try to follow
the “Noahide Laws” and repent whenever they fail. “Teshuvah” is important to Jews
as it is to us Christians. Judaism is NOT racist and does NOT claim that God only loves the Jews.

That said, they ARE the Chosen People. Even in New Testament Times.
Even St. Paul, who, in scripture, could sometimes be fiercely critical of the Jewish LEADERS of his day, stated plainly and in NO UNCERTAIN TERMS, that
The Jewish People remain Especially Beloved By God for the Sake of the (Israelite) Patriarchs. Meaning that God loved Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, STILL DOES, and made promises to them, and thru them to their spiritual AND fleshly descendants, that He, God, STILL INTENDS to keep. The Jews are under God’s protection.
I am Catholic, but I could tell you MANY surprising, well authenticated stories of miracles which occured during the 1967 and 1973 Israeli wars, in which Arab soldiers, armed to THE TEETH and outnumbering the Israeli soldiers often by 13 to 1, suddenly , all together, dropped to their knees, threw down their weapons, and SURRENDERED to the greatly outnumbered Israeli soldiers. The Israeli soldiers, young men of around 19, would look at each other, perplexed, wondering, what the hell? WHY are they surrendering???
Well, in documentaries on Discovery and History Channel, etc, in recent years, many of those Arabs who surrendered told, on CAMERA, just WHY they surrendered:
As they were advancing up the hill to kill the 10 or 20 Israeli soldiers, HUNDREDS OF THEM, suddenly, IN GLORY, Prophet “Ibrahim” (Abraham) and ANGELS WITH DRAWN SWORDS appeared in front of them and ordered them to halt. The Israelis did NOT see these apparitions, but their numerically vastly-superior Enemies DID, and they DROPPED their weapons and surrendered. As one Arab put it on camera, WHEN PROPHET IBRAHIM TELLS YOU TO SURRENDER, YOU SURRENDER. Wise answer, I think.
Please note, the Israelis were outnumbered by hundreds of thousands of well armed, SOVIET ARMED, Arabs who wanted, intended, to massacre and annihilate them.
Yet they stopped dead in their tracks.
If these things HAD NOT happened, Israel, tiny Israel, WOULD HAVE BEEN annihilated.
These are not apocryphal stories, and NO proud Arab Muslim would lyingly say such things, which make the Jews look “good.” These things happened.
There is a true saying: IF YOU EAT POPE, YOU WILL DIE OF IT.
Same thing with the Jewish People: DON’T ABUSE THEM.
Because if you DO, you most certainly WILL regret it dearly.
 
God loves everyone.

You must understand the history of the Jewish people: they are the descendants of Abraham, and it was Abraham who was chosen.

Abraham lived in a time when the world had turned away from God; he was the only faithful man in the world. So God chose to work through him to bring salvation to the entire hum race, by revealing Himself to him and his descendants after him, making them a holy people and teaching them His ways. From the Christian perspective, this was all in preparation for His incarnation.

Without the history of the Jewish people, Jesus wouldn’t make sense.

As for Peter’s “bigotry,” this was an issue that Jesus Himself addressed, and was, in Peter’s case, resolved by a direct revelation from God. Peter, like all humans, was still subject to pride, prejudice, and all those other “wonderful” sins we are all so fond of committing.
 
God so loved the world that he sent His only begotten Son, Our Lord, Jesus Christ as Saviour. The Jews (most of them) did not accept Jesus as their Messiah (that is king or high priest), but the Gentiles (non-Hebrews and not Roman citizens) were eager to hear the Word, so they became followers of Christ (Christians). The Jews remain God’s Chosen People, and one day they will be reconciled.
 
So I was listening to some EWTN and I had been pondering this for a while as well.
But since the Jews are God’s chosen people, why doesn’t God like everyone else?
Especially some 5000 years later after picking out what people are his favorites.
On top of that;
I had heard on EWTN that at first St. Peter didn’t want to baptize Gentiles
,(a derogatory term.)
Doesn’t this make St. Peter a bigot; the whole thing sounds a bit hoaky to me.
Read Romans 11, all of it. The Jews who accepted Christ have remained as the Chosen People. Some “branches have fallen off” - i.e., a part of the Jews rejected the Messiah - and Gentiles - those who accepted the Messiah - have been “grafted on.” The Jews as an ethnic group are special historically insofar as it is through them that God chose to reveal Himself to the world, but otherwise, the Jews of today are not favoured in any particular way in having rejected the Messiah.

The Jews who did accept the Messiah in the early days of Christianity have largely lost their ethnic affiliation and assimilated with the Gentile cultures they lived in. God is not a racist. God favoured the Jews because they were obedient to Him, and many continued in their obedience and became Christian, but there were indeed many who rejected the Messiah.

This essentially means that Messianic Jews are God’s Chosen people. And Christians of all races are essentially Messianic Jews - we accept the Old Testament and the Messiah. And so a person belonging to the Jewish ethnic group is part of the Chosen People insofar as he is Christian. An ethnically Jewish person who rejects the Messiah is no different from an ethnically French, Chinese or Peruvian person who rejects the Messiah.
 
So I was listening to some EWTN and I had been pondering this for a while as well.
But since the Jews are God’s chosen people, why doesn’t God like everyone else?
Especially some 5000 years later after picking out what people are his favorites.
On top of that;
I had heard on EWTN that at first St. Peter didn’t want to baptize Gentiles
,(a derogatory term.)
Doesn’t this make St. Peter a bigot; the whole thing sounds a bit hoaky to me.
Well as a Catholic, I do believe that God loves everyone including those who hate Jews. Our Lord Jesus said this on scripture:
“For God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him shall not perish, but have eternal life.”(John 3:16)
God favored the Jews on one simple reason, He made a covenant with Abraham ,with Isaac and with Jacob which he intends to fulfill by all means.
**
This favor is not based on the Jews deserving it but on God’s own character and on his covenant promises to which he is always faithful.
**
God had a plan for the whole world to know him and his chosen method was to call out a people whom he could use as a vehicle to reveal himself. Since somebody already pointed out that Jews were instrumental in the coming of Salvation through Jesus 2000 years ago, its also important to identify one miraculous event that happened more recently.

Look on the modern day Jewish State, it was established right after the horrific attempt to destroy all Jews during ww2. The establishment of this country as a home for all Jews showed the existence of God who is constantly on watch, who is still in control amidst all the chaos of this world and who is up against the powers/principalities that want to prove Him wrong.

Some people pointed out that in order for us to prove God existence just look on the Jews. Look what they have gone throughout history. They survive civilizations, nations and empires that wanted their destruction. They endured Egyptian, Philistines, Assyrian, Babylonian, Persian, Greek, Roman Empires, The Crusades, the Spanish Inquisitions, Nazi Germany, Communist Russia.

If they were not favored by God then they would have simply disappeared in the timelines of History without any trace.

Yes, Jews are under great favor…still.
 
So I was listening to some EWTN and I had been pondering this for a while as well.
But since the Jews are God’s chosen people, why doesn’t God like everyone else?
Especially some 5000 years later after picking out what people are his favorites.
Since Christ came for all people, it’s easy to see that God doesn’t “only like the Jews.” His choice of the Jews is within the economy of Salvation. By that is meant that God reveals Himself gradually to His people according to what they can handle at the time, until the Fullness of Time when He reveals Himself in His Son Incarnate. If one accepts the Incarnation of God in Christ Jesus, then it follows that to become Incarnate God would necessarily have chosen from one specific group of people, and prepared that people to receive Him.

After the sin of our First Parents, the human race was left with natural law and Angels to guide it. God’s solution was not to deal with the whole human race personally, but to choose an obscure and unimportant and motley race of Semites and reveal Himself to them first, bringing about the Incarnation of His Son from them, and then through His Church to reach the whole human race. As Chesterton wrote, “How odd of God to choose the Jews,” since they didn’t learn very well.

God’s main point of instructing the Israelites first was to impress upon them that He alone was God and was to be loved and obeyed first and above all. But there were a very earthy and stubborn race and learned this lesson with difficulty (in fact, did not really get the point until the destruction of Jerusalem and the Exile).

By obedience to His will they would learn that God personally chose them from among the nations (the rest had only guardian angels over them, but the Hebrews had Yahweh Himself) and that He would bless them if they followed His will. Thus God raised up prophets from among them to guide them and to bring them back to Him when they were following foreign gods and/or living not according to the teachings they received through Moses. All this prepared them for the birth of the Messiah in their midst - the One Who would be the Savior of all Nations.
 
I don’t know where the person on ETWN gets that from. I know that in the the bible Peter is involved in a dispute between other members of the church. One side was arguing that the gentiles had to be circumcised before being baptized into the christian faith, but Peter stood up and said, basically, “NO, THEY DON’T.” and that settled it. That’s the first council of Jerusalem if I’m not mistaken.

God brought salvation to the entire world through the Jews, not just to the Jews. While he may have favor towards them because of that, God loves everyone.
 
**An ethnically Jewish person who rejects the Messiah is no different from an ethnically French, Chinese or Peruvian person who rejects the Messiah. **

Sorry, friend, but this is categorically in error.
St. Paul, writing of the UNBELIEVING and EXTREMELY hostile-to-Christianity JEWS
of HIS day, wrote that THEY REMAIN BELOVED FOR THE SAKE OF THE
PATRIARCHS.
That did not mean because God liked Abraham’s beard, or Jacob’s style of clothing.
Or Mose’s cologne (or lack thereof).

God made promises, to the Patriarchs, that their SEED, not just the always-faithful
ones, would remain, forever, under God’s special protection until the very End of
the World.
Would they sometimes be punished? OH YES. Their own holy prophets said so,
over and over again. The horrific destruction of Jerusalem in 587 BC by the Babylonians led by Nebuchadnezzar, was a divine punishment on that Nation and people for their refusal to repent of their Apostasy. But he punished them PRECISELY to SAVE them,
because if he HADN’T done that, NONE of them would have EVER repented, and they would have thoroughly eventually assimilated with the Pagan Nations, and the chosen people would have ceased to exist.
It was God’s decision to punish them in 587 B.C., and the prophets said so.
That’s from GOD’S angle.
BUT WOE BETIDE the ones, the HUMAN ones, who CARRIED OUT the punishment.
God’s reasons were VERY DIFFERENT from THEIRS.
THEIR reasons were an arrogant dislike of the Israelite people, whom they held in scorn,
and they did what they did to them out of malice. God MADE USE of their malice for His disciplinary purposes, but then he punished, SEVERELY, the Babylonian nation that had carried out HIS OWN discipline of them because of their, the Babylonians’s, MOTIVES for doing so. Namely, arrogance and a feeling of superiority. First, he caused Nebuchadnezzar to go INSANE for 7 years, like a wild beast eating weeds, then restored him to sanity, to put this arrogant King in his place. Neb repented. His successors DID NOT, so God sent in the Medes and Persians (right after the famous “handwriting on the wall” episode during BelShazzar’s feast), who punished the living DAYLIGHTS out of Babylon. In one night, the arrogant city of Babylon was taken captive, BECAUSE of what it had done to the (apostate) Jews.

Paul reiterated this truth. The Jewish leaders of his day were very anti-Christian, but even then, Paul insisted that the UNbelieving Jews remained very special to, and beloved by,
God Almighty. He put that in infallible scripture. We dare not disregard that, dare not play it down, dare not ignore it.
A Jew, a descendant of Abraham according to the flesh, is NOT in the same position before God as any other unbeliever in Jesus. Especially 2000 years after the crucifixion, when they are also now largely CULTURAL nonChristians, who never witnessed any of Jesus’s miracles firsthand and rejected them. They are beloved by God and protected by God, as many Arabs, who outnumbered them more than 10 to 1 in both personnel and weaponry during the 1967 and 1973 wars, found out to their shock, consternation and, in some cases (as I described above, documented) great surprise and terror.
Do NOT make the mistake, the fatal mistake, of abusing the Jewish people.
God is still especially protecting them. For the sake of the (promises made to) the Patriarchs, and He will continue to do so.
 
So I was listening to some EWTN and I had been pondering this for a while as well.
But since the Jews are God’s chosen people, why doesn’t God like everyone else?
Especially some 5000 years later after picking out what people are his favorites.
On top of that;
I had heard on EWTN that at first St. Peter didn’t want to baptize Gentiles
,(a derogatory term.)
Doesn’t this make St. Peter a bigot; the whole thing sounds a bit hoaky to me.
You should understand that “chosen” means “chosen” and not necessarily “most loved” – in fact, it could mean the exact opposite – I have chosen you to be X because I do not like you.

Being the “Chosen People” generally means, from Judaism’s perspective, that Jews have a special relationship with God but a purpose that comes with responsibilities. It’s not about God loving Jews more and non-Jews less, or Jews being inherently better than non-Jews. You can sometimes see non-Jews behaving better in the Old Testament.

I think, I am not sure, St. Peter was hesitant to bring in Gentiles because there was an issue in early Christianity (which was still part of Judaism) about the Mosaic Law, and whether Gentiles should or shouldn’t be converted under the Mosaic Law.
 
Since Christ came for all people, it’s easy to see that God doesn’t “only like the Jews.” His choice of the Jews is within the economy of Salvation. By that is meant that God reveals Himself gradually to His people according to what they can handle at the time, until the Fullness of Time when He reveals Himself in His Son Incarnate. If one accepts the Incarnation of God in Christ Jesus, then it follows that to become Incarnate God would necessarily have chosen from one specific group of people, and prepared that people to receive Him.

After the sin of our First Parents, the human race was left with natural law and Angels to guide it. God’s solution was not to deal with the whole human race personally, but to choose an obscure and unimportant and motley race of Semites and reveal Himself to them first, bringing about the Incarnation of His Son from them, and then through His Church to reach the whole human race. As Chesterton wrote, “How odd of God to choose the Jews,” since they didn’t learn very well.

God’s main point of instructing the Israelites first was to impress upon them that He alone was God and was to be loved and obeyed first and above all. But there were a very earthy and stubborn race and learned this lesson with difficulty (in fact, did not really get the point until the destruction of Jerusalem and the Exile).

By obedience to His will they would learn that God personally chose them from among the nations (the rest had only guardian angels over them, but the Hebrews had Yahweh Himself) and that He would bless them if they followed His will. Thus God raised up prophets from among them to guide them and to bring them back to Him when they were following foreign gods and/or living not according to the teachings they received through Moses. All this prepared them for the birth of the Messiah in their midst - the One Who would be the Savior of all Nations.
My question is, are Jews really rejecting Christ out of stubbornness, if in their view they are only doing what Mosaic Law told them to do?
 
If Jews are still dear to God, does supporting them blndly make one blessed? I support neither Islamofascism nor Talmudic Judaism. In my view the antichrist (false messiah) will fulfill the Jewish desire for a conquering messiah who will subdue all gentiles.
 
**An ethnically Jewish person who rejects the Messiah is no different from an ethnically French, Chinese or Peruvian person who rejects the Messiah. **

Sorry, friend, but this is categorically in error.
St. Paul, writing of the UNBELIEVING and EXTREMELY hostile-to-Christianity JEWS
of HIS day, wrote that THEY REMAIN BELOVED FOR THE SAKE OF THE
PATRIARCHS.
That did not mean because God liked Abraham’s beard, or Jacob’s style of clothing.
Or Mose’s cologne (or lack thereof).

God made promises, to the Patriarchs, that their SEED, not just the always-faithful
ones, would remain, forever, under God’s special protection until the very End of
the World.
See, I take issue with that, and here’s why.

On my father’s side, my family is Jewish. My mother’s side of the family is Gentile. That would make me Gentile in the matrilineal tradition.

My family members on my mother’s side tend to be nominal Christians, believing or unbelieving, atheists and agnostics. On my father’s side, they’re mostly Jewish, although almost all of the ones that I know are strong atheists and have been for generations, though most of them identify themselves very strongly as Jews. My father himself, though technically Jewish, doesn’t identify as such and has recently become Catholic.

Am I to understand that the Jewish atheists on my father’s side are somehow favoured by God over the Gentile atheists on my mother’s side? How are the European Gentile atheists in my family who reject all religion different from the Jewish atheists in my family who reject all religion? Why would my equating the two be categorically in error?

My cousin on my father’s side doesn’t identify one bit with his Jewish heritage and isn’t even circumcised. We both rejected God, the Old and the New Covenants. Did God love him more than me when I was atheist just because he is technically Jewish and I am half-Jewish but technically Gentile? And what about my more distant relatives, some of whom might not even know of their Jewish heritage?

And what about the black Jews? Many cannot trace their roots to the original Israelites beyond myth, and are a testament to ancient proselytism. Is the racism they often suffer from other Jews justified? Does God’s favour only extend to white Jews who are more likely to be literally descended from Abraham? Or is it by faith that both black and white Jews are part of the Old Covenant and spiritual descendants of Abraham, much like it is by faith that we are part of the New Covenant and also the spiritual descendants of our father in faith, Abraham? I’d imagine that it is faith and not race that means one belongs to one of the covenants of God.

St Paul said, “As far as the gospel is concerned, they are enemies on your account; but as far as election is concerned, they are loved on account of the patriarchs, for God’s gifts and his call are irrevocable.” (Romans 11:28-29)

How is that different from the traditional Catholic teaching that the Old Covenant will forever be valid but that it is no longer salvific, as it has been abrogated and fulfilled in the New Covenant? The Old Covenant faith of (some of) the Jews (and arguably perhaps even to some extent the Muslims who also claim to uphold the Abrahamic Covenant) is pleasing to God insofar as it is the faith of the Patriarchs and forms a part of the True Faith, and it is not through genetics that they can lay claim to God’s election but through faith only, much like Christians (Gentile and Jewish) can lay claim to God’s election in this way, and in so doing form the New Israel. It can be said that in that limited sense, Jews faithful to the Old Covenant faith of the Patriarchs do maintain their election, or their “chosen”-ness because the Old Covenant is forever valid. But this would be in an equal or lesser way than Christians, and in an equal or greater way than Muslims, who are adherents of a Judaeo-Christian heresy.
Do NOT make the mistake, the fatal mistake, of abusing the Jewish people.
Why would I want to abuse the Jewish people?
God is still especially protecting them. For the sake of the (promises made to) the Patriarchs, and He will continue to do so.
Insofar as they continue to adhere to the Old Covenant faith, which many of them don’t, yes, they are beloved of God. They are enemies of God in their rejection of the New Covenant, but to a lesser extent than those who have rejected both Covenants. But to claim more than that would be to flirt with the various heresies of Dual Covenant theology, dispensationalism and the like.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top