Does it matter why we believe?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kullervo
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Looked up the word. I wasn’t familiar with it. I am linking it for other people that may not know. In my interpretation, what I said is supported by what is in this link. Unless I really just don’t understand.:confused:

 
From my outside perspective, it seems many Christians, not just Catholics have a simple basic faith.

I don’t see anything wrong with them. Just because many people have never given deep thought to why they believe, don’t have philosophical arguments and really haven’t questioned their faith doesn’t mean they haven’t a a deep real faith in their religion.

Perhaps they are at risk of a persuasive challenge but I haven’t really seen that, either. They are comfortable where they are. It gives them a sense of peace and a guide they try to live by. Not everyone is skeptical, fanatical or even highly educated. It’s just part of who they are and where they’re going.
 
Thank you for your eloquent explanation. Those are exactly my thoughts as well.
 
Well okay, tell everyone’s grandparents in the 50s that they were all doing it wrong then.
Well, they weren’t gods and they didn’t try to play one on TV either.

They had a different sense of God than we Catholics have today. A deep abiding reverence that I think was likely lost with the modern changes of Vatican II (in Catholicism) and the earlier acceptance of birth control by the "29 Lambeth Conference (Anglicanism?).

My sponsor told me that for her age group, Christians across denominations in general, regarded artificial contraception as a more horrific sin than abortion.

I remember asking her how they could have believed that because abortion destroys human life.

She explained to me that in earlier Christian reasoning, abortion was very evil because it did murder human life. However, the human life that was murdered at least had the opportunity to have come into existence at God’s command, allowing at least part of God’s Will to make that human life in His image and likeness, even if the human life only existed for a small time.

However, with artificial contraception, the couple puts themselves into God’s place, choosing to thwart God’s Will of creating human life in His image and likeness. My sponsor and her Christian peers believed it was more more sinful to put self into God’s rightful position of power as the Author of Human Life, and obstruct God’s Will by preventing God himself from bringing a new human being into existence. I was very surprised at this reasoning, but it did make perfect sense from a Christian perspective of serving God.

My sponsor into the Faith was a Catholic convert
 
artificial contraception
Personally I am against it. Take for instance Sir Elton John.

I totally understand he has unconditional love for his Son and Husband or any married couple.

A child needs love and obviously a person who goes down this route will achieve their goal. I have no doubt they have much love to give.

But why I am against artificial contraception : there are so many young children in the world who for whatever reason have become orphans. Why not give this love to them and raise them as your own.

I have so much respect for adopting parents because if my own dad was not adopted… Perhaps I wouldn’t be here today speaking to you guys.
 
But why I am against artificial contraception : there are so many young children in the world who for whatever reason have become orphans. Why not give this love to them and raise them as your own.
I think you are confusing artificial contraception with artificial insemination.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top