F
fisherman_carl
Guest
Does mandatory Sunday church attendance help or hurt the Mass experience?
Neither. The mandatory nature of attendance is neither here nor there.Does mandatory Sunday church attendance help or hurt the Mass experience?
I don’t think I understand the question. I got to Mass to experience the Eucharist.Does mandatory Sunday church attendance help or hurt the Mass experience?
Ive been at a Mass where the people behind me were laughing amd talking through the whole thing and making fun of things. If u go to a week day Mass the people there want to be there and are generally more prayerful. There are more distractions at Sunday Mass.I don’t think I understand the question. I got to Mass to experience the Eucharist.
How can you tell who is devout and who is there out of obligation? And why would that have any impact on your Mass experience?
It is not, in any way, mandatory Sunday church attendance. That does not exist in Catholicism.Does mandatory Sunday church attendance help or hurt the Mass experience?
Now I see what you are getting at.Ive been at a Mass where the people behind me were laughing amd talking through the whole thing and making fun of things. If u go to a week day Mass the people there want to be there and are generally more prayerful. There are more distractions at Sunday Mass.
That’s a good point. I suppose it could help them even if they dont want to be there. I dont know. I just like the weekday Mass better. The atmosphere is better. I just find it harder to concentate with so many distractions on Sunday. Im not talking anything theological here. Just personal experience.Now I see what you are getting at.
You are asking whether the mandatory nature of the Mass results in more distractions since a number of people might go simply because it is mandatory.
That is an interesting question.
The difficulty with answering it, however, is that we as human beings have no idea what benefits are being received even by the noisy and distracted ones.
An analogy might be the emergency room of a hospital. If people who are going to Mass are receiving “emergency” aid and barely staying alive because of it, we might need to just grin and bear it if we are in a less precarious condition. However, you might want to try other Mass times or compensate by attending a weekday Mass or Adoration in quiet when available.
Too many people seem to look at the teachings of the Church as “rules” issued by some “power” instead of seeing them as “responsibilities” described and taught by those in authority and for our own good.God gave everyone free will; ostensibly so we would choose to follow Him as opposed to be compelled to follow Him. So using that same logic, would it not be better if Mass was optional and we attended on our own initiative rather that it be mandatory and go there just to get our ticket punched?
Should have no impact, however, anyone participating in Mass out of obligation and not out of desire might have some self-reflecting to do. It might be argued that attending out of obligation is sinful by not loving God with all your heart, all your mind, all your soul.Does mandatory Sunday church attendance help or hurt the Mass experience?
That’s the wrong question to ask, because even those who show up out of mere loyalty are still subject to the grace of the mass, even if they’re just a little farther back along the spiritual trail to sanctification.Does mandatory Sunday church attendance help or hurt the Mass experience?
Absolutely correct. In the US, only about 20% of the country is Catholic, and only about 20% of those actually go to mass weekly. This is 20%x20% or about 4% of the population. The individuals that make up that approximately 4% of the country, who take the obligation to go seriously enough to show up, are usually pretty respectful. We do have some who only show up when they feel like it, but they’re subdued by the more serious 4% here in most cases.Interesting question.
I find that in the United States, when people don’t want to go to Mass, they just don’t. Those who are prone to getting bored and chatting just don’t go. Mass ends up being solemn.
In the Philippines however, it is different – people do often chat during Mass and it can be irreverent.
Why the difference? It’s due to how big the Catholic portion of the population is.
In a country where over 80% of people are Catholic like the Philippines, people generally go to Mass, there being a tendency to go with the herd. The United States has a smaller percentage of Catholics (in the 20s I think?) so there is no go-with-the-herd tendency to go to Mass – actually the herd tendency is to be secular and to dismiss church off. As a result, the chatters tend to get filtered out and just don’t go, so what’s left are people who are more capable of respectful liturgy.
In my experience, American parishes tend to be smaller in size or in attendance (or both), whereas in the Philippines a lot of people go. So in the US, if you’re noisy in church, people will notice. In the Philippines, it would be harder to spot out who’s making noise. Overseeing a big assembly differs from overseeing a small one.
I think culture and education factor in too. In the Philippines, the vast majority of the people are impoverished and uneducated and might not follow decorum the way you and I think is appropriate.
The Sunday obligation isn’t a bad rule, but the Vatican has the unfortunate task of coming up with rules that must apply universally (they can’t make up one set of rules for one region and another set for another region). It can end up incomprehensibly lopsided sometimes, but that’s just the nature of the world God gave us and the Vatican is trying to be as fair as is humanly possible.
That can be carried to an extreme. Where does it stop?If a person (without good reason) chooses not to attend Sunday mass…that is to choose not to put God first in their week…what does this say about where God is in their life? What are their priorities.
If I understand correctly…The “Sin” incurred from missing Sunday mass is therefore not for “breaking the Mass obligation rule”, but for failing to place God first in ones life.
The sin is, in fact, disobeying lawful Church authority. So, it is not a “new” sin that the Church creates, it is merely a specific occasion in which disobedience can occur.That can be carried to an extreme. Where does it stop?
Should I go to work or stay home and pray my rosary all day? Well, God must come first so I guess I will stay home and pray.
Should I feed my family or stay home and pray my rosary all day? Well, unfortunately for my family, God must come first so I guess I will stay home and pray.
Should I do this or that or something else that is important? Nope. God is more important than anything else so I should pray instead.
If I understand correctly…
Ergo, how can the Church say “missing mass is a mortal sin” when in fact mandatory mass attendance is a Church law?
- There are two kinds of laws; the Laws of God and laws or the church.
- Laws made by the Church can be changed. “Fish on Friday” for example is a Church law that was changed from every Friday to just Lenten Fridays.
- God’s law, however, cannot be changed, and by extension, the Church cannot “create” new sins or “repeal” old ones.
That can be carried to an extreme. Where does it stop?
Should I go to work or stay home and pray my rosary all day? Well, God must come first so I guess I will stay home and pray.
This is ridiculous. We have to do God’s will according to the state of our life. If you were a cloistered nun, you’d spend much more time praying than if you are a busy father of 3 with two jobs. If instead of acting upon what you are supposed to do you chose, out of your will, to do something else, then even praying can turn into a gravely sinful act.
In fact, the apostle James wrote on this matter:
you say, “Good-bye and have a good day; stay warm and eat well”–but then you don’t give that person any food or clothing. What good does that do?