Does one have to be perfectly contrite to have communion?

  • Thread starter Thread starter fakename
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
F

fakename

Guest
I’ve been coming across various sources that seem to imply so but at the same time I also see some sources that say at least imperfect contrition is needed or don’t mention the issue at all -so I’ve come here to ask.
 
I’ve been coming across various sources that seem to imply so but at the same time I also see some sources that say at least imperfect contrition is needed or don’t mention the issue at all -so I’ve come here to ask.
Your sources cannot be Catholic ones. Have you consulted the Catechism?
1415 Anyone who desires to receive Christ in Eucharistic communion must be in the state of grace. Anyone aware of having sinned mortally must not receive communion without having received absolution in the sacrament of penance.
Where does this say anything about perfect contrition?
 
I’ve been coming across various sources that seem to imply so but at the same time I also see some sources that say at least imperfect contrition is needed or don’t mention the issue at all -so I’ve come here to ask.
My first thought on reading this was - why are you asking this? Why would you want to have anything BUT perfect contrition?

Now - if the issue is that you are still fighting with an attraction to sin and so you see this attraction to sin as somehow signalling an “imperfect” contrition…this is a wrong view.

Consider the person who is a couch potato but decides to get out and wlak and eat right etc and get in shape. Does their desire for the couch go away immediately? Does their craving for twinkies sstop immediately? Of course not…But so long as they are resisting and working out and moving toward the goal (if with an occasional failure), They will see progress.
Likewise the person who is overcoming sin. Perfect contrition might not mean you’ve overcome the temptations…the attractions…but if you keep resisting you are in good shape.

Peace
James
 
Your sources cannot be Catholic ones. Have you consulted the Catechism?

Where does this say anything about perfect contrition?
From the Catholic Encyclopedia:

“Presupposing what is self-evident, that there is question neither of…nor a lack of imperfect contrition (attritio), which would altogether hinder the justifying effect of the sacrament (Communion),…”

So the logic of this line suggests that at least imperfect contrition is a necessary condition for attaining the host.

As to the other question, I think that that line implies the opposite (that contrition is not requisite to have the Eucharist (unless one counts the contrition needed to go to confession).
 
From the Catholic Encyclopedia:

“Presupposing what is self-evident, that there is question neither of…nor a lack of imperfect contrition (attritio), which would altogether hinder the justifying effect of the sacrament (Communion),…”

So the logic of this line suggests that at least imperfect contrition is a necessary condition for attaining the host.

As to the other question, I think that that line implies the opposite (that contrition is not requisite to have the Eucharist (unless one counts the contrition needed to go to confession).
It appears that the part quoted is very narrow and perhaps a greater context is needed to make a more full and accurate assessment. Do you have a link to the appropriate page that we may read more fully?

As to the need for contrition, at the beginnig of mass, we confess and ask forgiveness. When you do this are you contrite?

Peace
James
 
From the Catholic Encyclopedia:

“Presupposing what is self-evident, that there is question neither of…nor a lack of imperfect contrition (attritio), which would altogether hinder the **justifying effect **of the sacrament (Communion),…”

So the logic of this line suggests that at least imperfect contrition is a necessary condition for attaining the host.

As to the other question, I think that that line implies the opposite (that contrition is not requisite to have the Eucharist (unless one counts the contrition needed to go to confession).
The bolded words seem to imply that this passage refers to the remission of venial sins that occurs when one receives Holy Communion worthily. This discussion is whether or not venial sins can be forgiven by Holy Communion if one is not sorry for them, not whether or not one can receive Holy Communion.
 
It appears that the part quoted is very narrow and perhaps a greater context is needed to make a more full and accurate assessment. Do you have a link to the appropriate page that we may read more fully?

As to the need for contrition, at the beginnig of mass, we confess and ask forgiveness. When you do this are you contrite?

Peace
James
I think the answer to the second question is yes.

As for the whole statement, I did read it fully, and it seems that contrition part is this:

“In spite of the principles just laid down, the question might be asked, if the Blessed Sacrament could not at times per accidens free the communicant from mortal sin, if he approached the Table of the Lord unconscious of the sinful state of his soul. Presupposing what is self-evident, that there is question neither of a conscious sacrilegious Communion nor a lack of imperfect contrition (attritio), which would altogether hinder the justifying effect of the sacrament, theologians incline to the opinion, that in such exceptional cases the Eucharist can restore the soul to the state of grace, but all without exception deny the possibility of the reviviscence of a sacrilegious or unfruitful Communion after the restoration of the soul’s proper moral condition has been effected, the Eucharist being different in this respect from the sacraments which imprint a character upon the soul (baptism, confirmation, and Holy orders).”

Do you know what the part from, “but all without exception deny…” means? It doesn’t have much to do with the original question I suppose but I am just curious.

thanks again for the replies
 
I think the answer to the second question is yes.
OK. Then if you are truly contrite during the penitential portion of the mass, any venial sins you have are forgiven and you may receive communion.
Then the only concern is mortal sin.
As for the whole statement, I did read it fully, and it seems that contrition part is this:
“In spite of the principles just laid down, the question might be asked, if the Blessed Sacrament could not at times per accidens free the communicant from mortal sin, if he approached the Table of the Lord unconscious of the sinful state of his soul. Presupposing what is self-evident, that there is question neither of a conscious sacrilegious Communion nor a lack of imperfect contrition (attritio), which would altogether hinder the justifying effect of the sacrament, theologians incline to the opinion, that in such exceptional cases the Eucharist can restore the soul to the state of grace, but all without exception deny the possibility of the reviviscence of a sacrilegious or unfruitful Communion after the restoration of the soul’s proper moral condition has been effected, the Eucharist being different in this respect from the sacraments which imprint a character upon the soul (baptism, confirmation, and Holy orders).”
Do you know what the part from, “but all without exception deny…” means? It doesn’t have much to do with the original question I suppose but I am just curious.
thanks again for the replies
Thanks for the clarification. I would still like a link if you could supply it so that I could review it myself.

As to the part you ask about, “but all without exception deny…”, refers back to the “theologens”, mentioned earlier in that sentence. It basically is saying that All theologens agree that, while a sincere communion can have a restorative effect, an insincere one cannot.

Peace
James
 
If I may ask, What do you consider to be “perfect contrition”? I think it might be helpful to the conversation if we knew how you see or define perfect and imperfect contrition.

The Catholic Encyclopedia defines perfect and imperfect contrition as:
Catholic teaching distinguishes a twofold hatred of sin; one, perfect contrition, rises from the love of God Who has been grievously offended; the other, imperfect contrition, arises principally from some other motives, such as loss of heaven, fear of hell, the heinousness of sin, etc. (Council of Trent, Sess. XIV, ch. iv de Contritione).

Does this fit with how you are defining perfect and imperfect contrition?

Peace
James
 
If I may ask, What do you consider to be “perfect contrition”? I think it might be helpful to the conversation if we knew how you see or define perfect and imperfect contrition.

The Catholic Encyclopedia defines perfect and imperfect contrition as:
Catholic teaching distinguishes a twofold hatred of sin; one, perfect contrition, rises from the love of God Who has been grievously offended; the other, imperfect contrition, arises principally from some other motives, such as loss of heaven, fear of hell, the heinousness of sin, etc. (Council of Trent, Sess. XIV, ch. iv de Contritione).

Does this fit with how you are defining perfect and imperfect contrition?

Peace
James
newadvent.org/cathen/05584a.htm

Yeah.

The thing is, perfect contrition seems to be a conscious willing but imperfect contrition is almost second nature (for me at least). So that means that I must be conscious to have a perfect contrition the next time I go for communion -that’s why the question bears such importance.
 
newadvent.org/cathen/05584a.htm

Yeah.

The thing is, perfect contrition seems to be a conscious willing but imperfect contrition is almost second nature (for me at least). So that means that I must be conscious to have a perfect contrition the next time I go for communion -that’s why the question bears such importance.
I think I understand what you are saying here abut the conscious effort needed.

But I think this is merely something that relates to the particular place we are in our individual journeys. Most people begin the spiritual journey for more selfish reasons (fear of hell, promise of heaven etc. As we grow in Holiness, these fears gradually give way to Love for God. So where you now say that imperfect contrition is second nature, eventually perfect contrition will become second nature.

Peace
James
 
So would you be so bold as to say that perfect contrition is needed in communion?
 
So would you be so bold as to say that perfect contrition is needed in communion?
No. This has been adequately demonstrated by the Church teaching that has been presented. Being in the state of grace does not require perfect contrition. A good confession of mortal sin is all that is required if one has committed mortal sin. One who only is in venial sin is still in the state of grace needed to properly receive communion.
 
So would you be so bold as to say that perfect contrition is needed in communion?
No - Not in the sense that perfect contrition is defined.
We need to be as contrite as possible based on where we are spiritually. Naturally as we mature in our faith and grow in holiness, the more we will be contrite out of Love and not fear - and the closer we come to perfect contrition.

Peace
James
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top