Does Paul say to submit to authority

  • Thread starter Thread starter exiled
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
E

exiled

Guest
I am no scholar, and I can hardly bear to go through each book again to look for the relevant passages.
Doesn’t Paul tell the Galations, or the Thessalonians, or some community to submit, or to listen to, or to obey one of the successors? Maybe Timothy, or Titus?
I’m trying to show that the apostles were not the only ones with the authority to teach, and that the apostles themselves exhorted Christians to listen to the words of “x”.
thanks
 
As a consequence of the Church’s power to legislate there follows her juridical authority. This may be defined as the right, and duty, of deciding definitively in a given case the true meaning of her own laws, an of the conformity, or non-conformity, of the actions of her subjects with the law. Our Lord himself gave an indication of the exercise of this sort of power (Matthew 18:15 ff) with reference to wrong doing among the faithful. The offending brother is first to be corrected privately, then, if he refuse to amend, the case is to brought before the Church. Ecclesiastical authority must next pronounce judgement. Should the guilty party refuse to abide by it, there is the appropriate sanction: he is to be regarded “as the heathen and the publican.” St. Paul acted as judge in this way in the case of the incestuous Corinthian (I Corinthians 5:3), and he gives explicit advice to Timothy as to the correct procedure (I Timothy 5:19).

Tomster
 
…Doesn’t Paul tell … some community to submit, or to listen to, or to obey one of the successors? Maybe Timothy…
1 Timothy 4:6 - 16:
If you put these instructions before the brethren, you will be a good minister of Christ Jesus…Command and teach these things. ***Let no one despise your youth…***attend to the public reading of scripture, to preaching, to teaching. Do not neglect the gift you have, which was given you by prophetic utterance when the council of elders laid their hands upon you.
Heb 13:17:
Obey your leaders and submit to them; for they are keeping watch over your souls, as men who will have to give account. Let them do this joyfully, and not sadly, for that would be of no advantage to you.
Titus 3:1:
Remind them to be submissive to rulers and authorities, to be obedient, to be ready for any honest work
 
I am no scholar, and I can hardly bear to go through each book again to look for the relevant passages.
Doesn’t Paul tell the Galations, or the Thessalonians, or some community to submit, or to listen to, or to obey one of the successors? Maybe Timothy, or Titus?
I’m trying to show that the apostles were not the only ones with the authority to teach, and that the apostles themselves exhorted Christians to listen to the words of “x”.
thanks
Titus 2:15:
[E]xhort and reprove with all authority. Let no one disregard you.
 
I am no scholar, and I can hardly bear to go through each book again to look for the relevant passages.

Perhaps a concordance would help ?​

Doesn’t Paul tell the Galatians, or the Thessalonians, or some community to submit, or to listen to, or to obey one of the successors? Maybe Timothy, or Titus?
I’m trying to show that the apostles were not the only ones with the authority to teach, and that the apostles themselves exhorted Christians to listen to the words of “x”.
thanks

It’s all %between%here in Romans 13 - which is the locus classicus for the Christian attitude to temporal authority.​

 
Didn’t St. Paul say something like this, “We resist you to the face” to St. Peter? That wasn’t certainly being very obedient
 
Didn’t St. Paul say something like this, “We resist you to the face” to St. Peter? That wasn’t certainly being very obedient
I think perhaps you are confusing disobedience with fraternal correction. Paul did not disobey Peter, yet he did correct Peter when believed him to have acted hypocritically.

Consider also St. Catherine of Siena, who taught,
Even if that vicar were a devil incarnate, I must not defy him. (St. Catherine, Letter to Bernabò Visconti)
Of all the doctors of the Catholic Church, St. Catherine was one of the most ardent defenders of obdience to the Holy Father. Yet, she was also very critical of Pope Gregory XI in her letters to him. St. Catherine gently accuses the pope of neglecting his office through the sin of pride and self love…
To you, most reverend and beloved father in Christ Jesus, your unworthy, poor, miserable daughter Catherine, servant and slave of the servants of Jesus Christ, writes in His precious Blood; with desire to see you a fruitful tree…

…Oh, sweet and true knowledge, which dost carry with thee the knife of hate, and dost stretch out the hand of holy desire, to draw forth and kill with this hate the worm of self-love–a worm that spoils and gnaws the root of our tree so that it cannot bear any fruit of life, but dries up, and its verdure lasts not! For if a man loves himself, perverse pride, head and source of every ill, lives in him, whatever his rank may be, prelate or subject.

… For he sees his subjects commit faults and sins, and pretends not to see them and fails to correct them; or if he does correct them, he does it with such coldness and lukewarmness that he does not accomplish anything, but plasters vice over; and he is always afraid of giving displeasure or of getting into a quarrel. All this is because he loves himself. Sometimes men like this want to get along with purely peaceful means. I say that this is the very worst cruelty which can be shown. If a wound when necessary is not cauterized or cut out with steel, but simply covered with ointment, not only does it fail to heal, but it infects everything, and many a time death follows from it.

Oh me, oh me, sweetest Babbo; mine! This is the reason that all the subjects are corrupted by impurity and iniquity. Oh me, weeping I say it! How dangerous is that worm we spoke of! For not only does it give death to the shepherd, but all the rest fall into sickness and death through it. …Oh, human wretchedness! Blind is the sick man who does not know his own need, and blind the shepherd-physician, who has regard to nothing but pleasing, and his own advantage–since, not to forfeit it, he refrains from using the knife of justice or the fire of ardent charity! …The cause of all this is, that he loves himself apart from God: so he does not follow sweet Jesus, the true Shepherd, who has given His life for His sheep. Truly, then, this perverse love is perilous for one’s self and for others, and truly to be shunned, since it works too much harm to every generation of people. I hope by the goodness of God, venerable father mine, that you will quench this in yourself…I will, then, that you be so true and good a shepherd that if you had a hundred thousand lives you would be ready to give them all for the honour of God and the salvation of His creatures. …

… there is a remedy for this, father: that we flee the love spoken of above, for ourselves and every creature apart from God. Let no more note be given to friends or parents or one’s temporal needs, but only to virtue and the exaltation of things spiritual. For temporal things are failing you from no other cause than from your neglect of the spiritual.[St. Catherine of Siena, *Letter to Pope Gregory XI
, ca. AD 1375].

Catholics have the right, even at times the obligation to manifest their opinion in matters related to the good of the Church. This is affirmed in Vatican II’s Dogmatic Constitution on the Church, Lumen Gentium. However, also within Lumen Gentium, is the obligation to be obedient to the decisions of the pastors of the Church.
By reason of the knowledge, competence, or pre-eminence which they have, the laity are empowered—indeed sometimes obliged—to manifest their opinion on those things which pertain to the good of the Church. If the occasion should arise, this should be done through the institutions established by the Church for that purpose, and always with truth, courage, and prudence, and with reverence and charity toward those who, by reason of their office, represent the person of Christ.

The laity should, as all Christians, promptly accept in Christian obedience decisions of their spiritual shepherds, since they are representatives of Christ as well as teachers and rulers in the Church. Lumen Gentium, 37]
 
Didn’t St. Paul say something like this, “We resist you to the face” to St. Peter? That wasn’t certainly being very obedient
St Paul was more interested in being obeyed than in showing obedience himself. As at present, subordinates often give the Pope a hard time.

In this case, St Peter admitted that St Paul was correct. He had accepted St Paul’s view on eating non-kosher meat, but them was afraid of what “certain men” might say, and served kosher when they came to visit. The picture given is of the type of leader who is anxious to please everyone, a not too uncommon pattern.

Obedience isn’t the same as agreeing with. Many Catholics disagree with their bishops on the Latin mass. Few bishops, if any, have tried to ban discussion of this subject. However quite a lot, including our own former bishop David, have restricted Latin Masses. If a Catholic attends a Tridentine Mass celebrated against the bishop’s instructions, he is being disobedient, but not if he criticises the bishop’s decision to forbid it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top