Does Scripture Directly address "Athiests"?

  • Thread starter Thread starter JRKH
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
J

JRKH

Guest
Back in the day it seems that there was a plethora of god’s and the vast majority, if not all people had some belief in a god or gods. Plus, as I recall the term “god” was not always restricted in the way that that it is today. Even certain men were sometimes referred to as “gods” (using whatever ancient term/language that was appropriate).

So this got me wondering. Is there anything in the bible that seems directed specifically at those who believe in no god what-so-ever?

Here I don’t refer to references to “non-believers” since most “pagans” would be labelled non-believers by the Jews and early Christians…

Peace
James
 
From the Catechism:
2123 "Many . . . of our contemporaries either do not at all perceive, or explicitly reject, this intimate and vital bond of man to God. Atheism must therefore be regarded as one of the most serious problems of our time."58
2124 The name “atheism” covers many very different phenomena.
One common form is the practical materialism which restricts its needs and aspirations to space and time.
Atheistic humanism falsely considers man to be "an end to himself, and the sole maker, with supreme control, of his own history."59
Another form of contemporary atheism looks for the liberation of man through economic and social liberation. "It holds that religion, of its very nature, thwarts such emancipation by raising man’s hopes in a future life, thus both deceiving him and discouraging him from working for a better form of life on earth."60
2125 Since it rejects or denies the existence of God, atheism is a sin against the virtue of religion.61
The imputability of this offense can be significantly diminished in virtue of the intentions and the circumstances.
"Believers can have more than a little to do with the rise of atheism. To the extent that they are careless about their instruction in the faith, or present its teaching falsely, or even fail in their religious, moral, or social life, they must be said to conceal rather than to reveal the true nature of God and of religion."62
2126 Atheism is often based on a false conception of human autonomy, exaggerated to the point of refusing any dependence on God.63
Yet, "to acknowledge God is in no way to oppose the dignity of man, since such dignity is grounded and brought to perfection in God. . . . "64 "For the Church knows full well that her message is in harmony with the most secret desires of the human heart."65
58 GS 19 § 1.
59 GS 20 § 2.
60 GS 20 § 2.
61 Cf. Rom 1:18.
62 GS 19 § 3.
63 Cf. GS 20 § 1.
64 GS 21 § 3.
65 GS 21 § 7
18* The wrath* of God* is indeed being revealed from heaven against every impiety and wickedness of those who suppress the truth by their wickedness.
 
Psalm 14:1, ‘The fool says in his heart, “There is no God.”’
 
Good question. No, it doesn’t.

Psalms does however allude to atheism when it says “The fool says in his heart, “There is no God.” They are corrupt, their deeds are vile; there is no one who does good” (Psalm 14:1). This is the only reference the Bible makes to atheism.

The reason that the Bible doesn’t speak explicitly about atheism is because atheism is a relatively new belief. Atheism primarily has its roots in the Enlightenment, which was an intellectual period in history where the scientific method was encouraged in forming beliefs rather than faith.
 
Good question. No, it doesn’t.

Psalms does however allude to atheism when it says “The fool says in his heart, “There is no God.” They are corrupt, their deeds are vile; there is no one who does good” (Psalm 14:1). This is the only reference the Bible makes to atheism.

The reason that the Bible doesn’t speak explicitly about atheism is because atheism is a relatively new belief. Atheism primarily has its roots in the Enlightenment, which was an intellectual period in history where the scientific method was encouraged in forming beliefs rather than faith.
Actually, the reason Atheism isn’t addressed in the bible is simpler than that. Those who did not believe in “all” the gods of the local pantheon were called atheists. Therefore, at the time of Jesus, all Hebrew’s who believed only in One god were called “atheists” by the Romans, Greeks, and others who had a pantheon.

Since the term would also apply to those who believed in no God, it wouldn’t be a good word to use in scripture as it would seem to condemn both the believing Hebrew’s and disbelieving Atheists at the same time.

Since one “swore” to tell the truth (eg: by the god(s) punishment), at this time, a person who didn’t believe in any God’s or demigods – was obviously considered a threat to society.
 
Romans 1:16-32 seems pertinent to this:
16* For I am not ashamed of the gospel: it is the power of God for salvation to every one who has faith, to the Jew first and also to the Greek. 17* For in it the righteousness of God is revealed through faith for faith; as it is written, “He who through faith is righteous shall live.” * 18* For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and wickedness of men who by their wickedness suppress the truth. 19 For what can be known about God is plain to them, because God has shown it to them. 20* Ever since the creation of the world his invisible nature, namely, his eternal power and deity, has been clearly perceived in the things that have been made. So they are without excuse; 21* for although they knew God they did not honor him as God or give thanks to him, but they became futile in their thinking and their senseless minds were darkened. 22 Claiming to be wise, they became fools, 23* and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images resembling mortal man or birds or animals or reptiles. 24 Therefore God gave them up in the lusts of their hearts to impurity, to the dishonoring of their bodies among themselves, 25 because they exchanged the truth about God for a lie and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed for ever! Amen. 26 For this reason God gave them up to dishonorable passions. Their women exchanged natural relations for unnatural, 27 and the men likewise gave up natural relations with women and were consumed with passion for one another, men committing shameless acts with men and receiving in their own persons the due penalty for their error. 28 And since they did not see fit to acknowledge God, God gave them up to a base mind and to improper conduct. 29 They were filled with all manner of wickedness, evil, covetousness, malice. Full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, malignity, they are gossips, 30 slanderers, haters of God, insolent, haughty, boastful, inventors of evil, disobedient to parents, 31 foolish, faithless, heartless, ruthless. 32 Though they know God’s decree that those who do such things deserve to die, they not only do them but approve those who practice them.
I think he is referring to idol worshipers, but the argument would apply even more strongly to those who worship self or nothing.
 
Good question. No, it doesn’t.

Psalms does however allude to atheism when it says “The fool says in his heart, “There is no God.” They are corrupt, their deeds are vile; there is no one who does good” (Psalm 14:1). This is the only reference the Bible makes to atheism.

The reason that the Bible doesn’t speak explicitly about atheism is because atheism is a relatively new belief. Atheism primarily has its roots in the Enlightenment, which was an intellectual period in history where the scientific method was encouraged in forming beliefs rather than faith.
What about the atheistic schools of ancient Vedic religion (and one of its offspring, Hinduism) and other Indian belief systems such as Jainism and Buddhism? I think you’re probably referring to Western Atheism (note the capitalization), which indeed only flowered during the ‘Enlightenment’ perhaps as a response to the political and religious (i.e. Christian) climate at the time but at least did have some predecessors in Greco-Roman philosophy.

While Atheism have indeed only become a formalized ‘belief system’ (yes, I will call it that) at a rather recent point in history, and while Atheists are increasing in the modern materialistic world, I’m more of the opinion that ‘atheists’ may have existed ever since humans believed in gods.
 
Precursors of thought native to some atheists are also mentioned at the beginning of Wisdom 2.

**Wisdom 2
**[1] For they reasoned unsoundly, saying to themselves,
"Short and sorrowful is our life,
and there is no remedy when a man comes to his end,
and no one has been known to return from Hades.
(speaks of people who do not believe in an afterlife)

[2] Because we were born by mere chance,
(Darwinism)

and hereafter we shall be as though we had never been;
(Belief in nothingness after death)

because the breath in our nostrils is smoke,
and reason is a spark kindled by the beating of our hearts.
(Materialism - because this part of the verse suggests that our very reason is a biological byproduct)

[3] When it is extinguished, the body will turn to ashes,
and the spirit will dissolve like empty air.
(Again, nothingness after death)

I have a more detailed treatment of Wisdom 2 on this matter at home, if you want, I can find it and post.
 
Precursors of thought native to some atheists are also mentioned at the beginning of Wisdom 2.

**Wisdom 2
**[1] For they reasoned unsoundly, saying to themselves,
"Short and sorrowful is our life,
and there is no remedy when a man comes to his end,
and no one has been known to return from Hades.
(speaks of people who do not believe in an afterlife)

[2] Because we were born by mere chance,
(Darwinism)

and hereafter we shall be as though we had never been;
(Belief in nothingness after death)

because the breath in our nostrils is smoke,
and reason is a spark kindled by the beating of our hearts.
(Materialism - because this part of the verse suggests that our very reason is a biological byproduct)

[3] When it is extinguished, the body will turn to ashes,
and the spirit will dissolve like empty air.
(Again, nothingness after death)

I have a more detailed treatment of Wisdom 2 on this matter at home, if you want, I can find it and post.
Wow very nice. This is a more direct reference to atheism than I think anyone would have imagined possible. I continued reading on and it just gets even more specific to exactly how the men described think.

“But let our strength be our norm of justice; for weakness proves itself useless. Let us beset the just one, because he is obnoxious to us; he sets himself against our doings, reproaches us for our transgressions of the law and charges us with violations of our training”
Wisdom 2:11-12

Another reference to Darwinism here and the survival of the fittest mentality. I love how just people are referred to as “obnoxious” as well because I believe the fit exactly how many atheists think of us religious sometimes 😉 We also see here a prediction or expression of how atheist like to try and bash us over the head with out own teachings. Seems like very little changes in a few thousands years haha.

“He professes to have knowledge of God and styles himself a child of the Lord. To us he is the censure of our thoughts; merely to see him is a hardship for us.”
Wisdom 2:13-14

Can it get anymore prophetic? Atheism always accuses religious thoughts as being censured. Even more prophetic is the part where it talks about how even seeing a just man is a hardship for them. This is very close to the current situation involving atheist attempts to get rid of any mention of God in the public square. Even having to look at a cross is a “hardship”.

“Because his life is not like other men’s, and different are his ways. He judges us debased; he holds aloof from our paths as from things impure. He calls blest the destiny of the just and boasts that God is his Father. Let us see whether his words be true; let us find out what will happen to him. For if the just one be the son of God, he will defend him and deliver him from the hand of his foes. With revilement and torture let us put him to the test that we may have proof of his gentleness and try his patience. Let us condemn him to a shameful death; for according to his own words, God will take care of him.”
Wisdom 2:15-20

Here is a description of the just man from the perspective of an atheist.

“These were their thoughts, but they erred; for their wickedness blinded them. And they knew not the hidden counsels of God; neither did they count on a recompense of holiness nor discern the innocent souls’ reward. For God formed man to be imperishable; the image of his own nature he made him. Bu by the envy of the devil, death entered the world, and they who are in his possession experience it.”
Wisdom 2:21-24

Switches back to the author of the book narrating, talking about the errors that atheists make.
 
Precursors of thought native to some atheists are also mentioned at the beginning of Wisdom 2.

**Wisdom 2
**[1] For they reasoned unsoundly, saying to themselves,
"Short and sorrowful is our life,
and there is no remedy when a man comes to his end,
and no one has been known to return from Hades.
(speaks of people who do not believe in an afterlife)

[2] Because we were born by mere chance,
(Darwinism)

and hereafter we shall be as though we had never been;
(Belief in nothingness after death)

because the breath in our nostrils is smoke,
and reason is a spark kindled by the beating of our hearts.
(Materialism - because this part of the verse suggests that our very reason is a biological byproduct)

[3] When it is extinguished, the body will turn to ashes,
and the spirit will dissolve like empty air.
(Again, nothingness after death)

I have a more detailed treatment of Wisdom 2 on this matter at home, if you want, I can find it and post.
Yes - If you would care to post it I’m sure many would benefit.

I have been most encouraged by the answers here.

Peace
James
 
Thank you to MarcoPolo for providing the quote of Wisdom. I never knew the Bible made a much clearer allusion to atheism than that; I’m slightly less culpable for not knowing as I have never come into contact with a “full” Bible (the Bible with the original set of books).
 
Thank you to MarcoPolo for providing the quote of Wisdom. I never knew the Bible made a much clearer allusion to atheism than that; I’m slightly less culpable for not knowing as I have never come into contact with a “full” Bible (the Bible with the original set of books).
It should be mentioned that most Bibles attribute this passage in the notes below the verse as being in reference to what Christ, the Son of God eventually suffered. In my opinion the passage definitely has a lot in it that is prophetic of what Christ will eventually suffer especially towards the end but there are a lot of things that don’t fit. I definitely think at the surface when the passage refers to a " son of God", it is in reference to how the Israelite’s in general referred to themselves. In any case I believe the passage can fully embrace both meanings.
 
It should be mentioned that most Bibles attribute this passage in the notes below the verse as being in reference to what Christ, the Son of God eventually suffered. In my opinion the passage definitely has a lot in it that is prophetic of what Christ will eventually suffer especially towards the end but there are a lot of things that don’t fit. I definitely think at the surface when the passage refers to a " son of God", it is in reference to how the Israelite’s in general referred to themselves. In any case I believe the passage can fully embrace both meanings.
Thank you. I read about that yesterday in fact when I read Wisdom 2 in its entirety. It seems to allude to Jesus’ later suffering. However, there are many places in the Bible where dual prophecies are made. For instance, Psalms says “Even my close friend, whom I trusted, he who shared my bread, has lifted up his heel against me” (Psalm 41:9) which was a prophecy of King David’s life and also of the betrayal of Jesus by Judas. So I think Wisdom 2 could be a dual prophecy as well.
 
Romans 1:16-32 seems pertinent to this:
I think he is referring to idol worshipers, but the argument would apply even more strongly to those who worship self or nothing.
The passage you are discussing is the one the CCC points to that indicates man may “reason” his way to God. It doesn’t immediately follow from the passage of Paul that an Atheist in the modern sense on the word is the target of the discussion.

Let me bring out some of the elements I see in the passage that your comments bring to mind. I think you have begun to analyze the scripture – but perhaps your thoughts need more development to be understood well by me or others…

Faith is spoken of as a “grace”; and as I have been discovering and exploring on another chirstian forum (eg: “worthy” forums – which are mysteriously blocking my thread’s access to cousins of mine of a different faith that I long to enter a full discussion with – interestingly enough the “worthy” forums appears to be tied to a bible college … 😃 … and perhaps I actually made someone THINK)

Grace, means both “please” and “thank you” in Greek; The Catholic prayer before a meal is quite correct in being called “grace” since we are thanking God and asking for a blessing at the same time.

Notice Roman 1:18 talks about “detaining” the truth in “injustice”; followed by Roman 1:21 which says “or given thanks”. So that the rejection of the relationship called “grace” is exactly what Paul is speaking about.

I think you are correct, Joe, in your assessment – although it isn’t obvious how no belief in “God” can be equivalent to believing an “animal” is God…
Until we recognize that atheists believe man is nothing MORE than an animal that dies in the end…

The idea of the Idol, Roman 1:23, would apply even to Marxist theory of “God” which is that God is a formula, a law of the universe, a thing to be manipulated and conquered. Marxism de-personalizes God in order to “rape” him. They worship the death of God! Such ideas are pragmatically identical to the reaction of Sodom which in the bible was first saved BY God through Abraham, and in place of “thanks” they attempt to rape God which causes their own destruction. (perhaps, preparing for war, they had a few sympathetic pitch and sulfer targets around…)

The beginning of the book of wisdom says, “they have made a covenant with death”. That alone is enough to say that the atheism envisioned in Wisdom and by Paul is one that is equivalent/vocative of Idol worship. Something which is made by man, whether an “idea” (formula/law) – object (Idol/magic control/aquisition of power); all of which are simply attempts to replace God by something that wishes to access his power – but not his person.

Pornography with respect to women, defaces them. It seeks to emphasize the body – and to exploit it for pleasure – but to ignore the human person which is intuitively seen in the “face” and the “eyes” which look back out at the person beholding.

For this reason, the face is usually hidden, eyes closed, etc. so that the person indulging in this sin of de-humanization can avoid thinking about the one thing that makes a person human – and not just an animal.

I think that Atheism, in the modern sense, is really attempting to do the same with God; derive pleasure from “conquest” of the universe, but hiding that there is anything like true “logic”, “reason”, or a “person” that makes it all “Go”.
Perhaps the atheist believes that “death” is what makes everything happen in a scriptural sense.

What do you think?
 
Thank you to MarcoPolo for providing the quote of Wisdom. I never knew the Bible made a much clearer allusion to atheism than that; I’m slightly less culpable for not knowing as I have never come into contact with a “full” Bible (the Bible with the original set of books).
Don’t worry, it’s not your fault! 😃
 
Darn, I forgot to post the further explanation of Wisdom 2 at home. I’ll try to remember again tonight.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top